Untruthfull and harmfull ads on this very cite!

I belive this type of ad is harmfull... Look at what Republicans are supporting.


Damo, call Google and complain.

Okay, Harry Reid, but you don't get to decide in a FREE America, what people advertise. If you want to ban a particular product, you have to establish it is harmful in a courtroom, with judges and juries, not just on your whim, like some bloated European king.

I think YOU are harmful to America, and need to be banned! How about them apples?
 
I understand y damo can't do anything about it, but I'd be embarrassed to be a fellow Republican with that guy.

"Obama's Mosque"

Ahh, yet again, we see the Libtards chinking away at the Tea Party movement, again by trying to guilt a libertarian conservative into disassociating with the others... how quaint! I love it when pinheads tell me I am crazy for thinking something, then do exactly what I said they would do.

Obama's Mosque? Wow, that really tweaked your melon's didn't it, pinhead?

Okay... OBAMA'S MOSQUE it IS!
:party:
 
Okay, Harry Reid, but you don't get to decide in a FREE America, what people advertise. If you want to ban a particular product, you have to establish it is harmful in a courtroom, with judges and juries, not just on your whim, like some bloated European king.

I think YOU are harmful to America, and need to be banned! How about them apples?

That is again, not true...

LIAR
 
Ahh, yet again, we see the Libtards chinking away at the Tea Party movement, again by trying to guilt a libertarian conservative into disassociating with the others... how quaint! I love it when pinheads tell me I am crazy for thinking something, then do exactly what I said they would do.

Obama's Mosque? Wow, that really tweaked your melon's didn't it, pinhead?

Okay... OBAMA'S MOSQUE it IS!
:party:

It just comfirms for me that the person who is saying it is a liar...
 
Some non-governmental censorship is okay. We deal with it every day. There are movies I don't let my 2 year old watch.
Are you equating censoring a political ad because you object to the content to parental censorship? THAT is exactly where your type is dangerous to liberty.

You ain't my daddy, asshole. We, the people, have the ability to determine for ourselves whether I am being lied to through an ad and wherein lies the truth, if any. (damned few ads of any kind, political, product, or even community service, are 100% truthful) If you own an information medium, you have the full right to choose what to present on it. If that medium belongs to someone else, you are stepping on their rights and the rights of their clientele when you start trying to influence what they present to adult Americans.

You go around saying certain ads should be banned because YOU believe them to be "dangerous" (it does not matter what the content is, lies, truth, or mixture, as long as it does not advocate or promote violence against a person, group, or the government) is exactly why the 3rd phrase of the 1st Amendment was written - so that totalitarians like yourself can never put your anti-liberty ideals into law.
 
I'm against government censorship, I'm for private owners of any forum to be allowed to decide what to show and what not to show. I believe when an ad is a clear lie, that is a good reason for a private owner to refuse to show it!!!
 
Back
Top