I guess on one hand you have to hand it to marxists. They never give up

Denial of logic. Inversion fallacy. Buzzword fallacy (spam).
Inversion fallacy. Buzzword fallacy. You’re not doing logic, you’re doing Pokémon. You just shout the names of moves you wish you understood and hope one of them lands.

If you ever manage to produce an actual argument instead of this bargain‑bin word salad, let me know. Until then, you’re just proving why calling out your spam is a public service.
 
Thanks for the laughs, Tobytone. You couldn’t refute a single-sourced point,
He just did, Zombie.
so you hid behind your broken catchphrase again. Every time you yell “another AI response,” all you’re really saying is I have no counterargument and this hurt my feelings.
AI is not an argument, Zombie. Cutting and pasting from AI as your post is just mindless.
Keep going, your panic is the best endorsement of my accuracy.
AI is not 'accuracy', Zombie.
 
He just did, Zombie.

AI is not an argument, Zombie. Cutting and pasting from AI as your post is just mindless.

AI is not 'accuracy', Zombie.
AI is not accuracy. Neither is whatever you’re doing, but here we are.

You keep pretending Tobytone refuted something, but you can’t name what, you can’t quote it, and you can’t explain it. All you’ve got is the same broken chant because you don’t have the brainpower to engage with the points themselves.

You’re not exposing anything, you’re just announcing you’re out of arguments.
 
More mindless posts by the Zombie. He is still trying to use AI for his brain.
“More mindless posts by the Zombie.” You keep saying that because you can’t touch a single sourced point in the fact check. Deleting the evidence isn’t a rebuttal, it’s a tantrum.

If you had an argument, you’d make one. Instead, you’re just whining about the format because the facts weren’t on your side.
 
You said it again? Beautiful. Every time you spam another AI response, you’re just announcing you still can’t refute a single thing I said. You’re not debating, you’re stalling. Keep looping, it only proves me right.
Void argument fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy. Buzzword fallacies (debate, stall, loop, proof, spam, refutation)

You haven't said anything, Zombie.
 
Inversion fallacy. Buzzword fallacy. You’re not doing logic, you’re doing Pokémon. You just shout the names of moves you wish you understood and hope one of them lands.

If you ever manage to produce an actual argument instead of this bargain‑bin word salad, let me know. Until then, you’re just proving why calling out your spam is a public service.
Fallacy fallacies. Argument of the Stone fallacy. Random words and phrases. No apparent coherency. Inversion fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy. Buzzword fallacies (buzzword, logic, Pokemon, moves, argument, spam)
Cliche fallacies.
 
Void argument fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy. Buzzword fallacies (debate, stall, loop, proof, spam, refutation)

You haven't said anything, Zombie.
You’re not doing logic, you’re doing refrigerator‑magnet poetry for idiots. Every time you spit out another fake fallacy, you prove you don’t understand a single word you’re using. You’re not debating me, you’re just malfunctioning in public.
 
AI is not accuracy.
So you finally agree on something. Obviously, it won't stop you from posting AI slop.
Neither is whatever you’re doing, but here we are.
Denial of logic. Argument of the Stone fallacy. Bulverism fallacy.
You keep pretending Tobytone refuted something,
He did, Zombie.
but you can’t name what,
Your AI slop, Zombie.
you can’t quote it,
I don't need to quote it, Zombie. It is YOUR problem.
and you can’t explain it.
I don't need to explain your AI slop. It is YOUR problem. You do it because you have no brain. You have to try to substitute AI for your brain.
All you’ve got is the same broken chant because you don’t have the brainpower to engage with the points themselves.
Inversion fallacy.
You’re not exposing anything, you’re just announcing you’re out of arguments.
You aren't making any arguments, Zombie. Inversion fallacy.
 
So you finally agree on something. Obviously, it won't stop you from posting AI slop.

Denial of logic. Argument of the Stone fallacy. Bulverism fallacy.

He did, Zombie.

Your AI slop, Zombie.

I don't need to quote it, Zombie. It is YOUR problem.

I don't need to explain your AI slop. It is YOUR problem. You do it because you have no brain. You have to try to substitute AI for your brain.

Inversion fallacy.

You aren't making any arguments, Zombie. Inversion fallacy.
you’re spamming. Every post you make is the same three words rearranged by an idiot who thinks repeating ‘AI slop’ counts as an argument. You’re not exposing my logic, you’re exposing your own brain‑vacancy on a loop.
 
“More mindless posts by the Zombie.” You keep saying that because you can’t touch a single sourced point in the fact check. Deleting the evidence isn’t a rebuttal, it’s a tantrum.
I only said it once, Zombie. There is no such thing as a 'fact check'. Go learn what 'fact' means. AI slop is not a proof, evidence, or even a conversation. AI won't work as your brain, Zombie.
If you had an argument, you’d make one.
I've made quite a few arguments on JPP. You completely ignore them. You would rather post AI slop.
Instead, you’re just whining about the format because the facts weren’t on your side.
AI slop isn't facts. Go learn what 'fact' means.
 
You’re not doing logic,
Logic is not a verb, Zombie.
you’re doing refrigerator‑magnet poetry for idiots.
Inversion fallacy.
Every time you spit out another fake fallacy,
Denial of logic.
you prove you don’t understand a single word you’re using.
Attempted proof by denial.
You’re not debating me, you’re just malfunctioning in public.
There are no debates on JPP, Zombie.
 
Back
Top