The numbers he posted are
roughly in the correct range for Black population percentages in those cities, based on U.S. Census Bureau estimates.
But — and this is the key —
population percentages do not prove causation.
Listing demographics is not the same as demonstrating a link between race and crime.
No. Criminologists overwhelmingly agree that
race is not a causal factor in crime rates.
The strongest predictors of violent crime are:
- concentrated poverty
- income inequality
- housing segregation
- underfunded schools
- lack of economic mobility
- policing strategy
- population density
- age distribution
These factors correlate with
historical segregation,
redlining, and
resource deprivation, which disproportionately affect Black communities — but
race itself is not the cause.
Authoritative sources:
- Brennan Center for Justice
- National Institute of Justice
- American Sociological Association
- FBI Uniform Crime Reports (UCR)
- CDC National Center for Health Statistics
All of them emphasize
structural conditions, not race.
This claim is
not supported by evidence.
Why?
Crime is concentrated in
Large cities — regardless of political leadership — have higher crime rates than suburbs or rural areas.This is a universal pattern across countries.
Many large U.S. cities lean Democratic
So the correlation is
city size, not party.
When comparing similar‑sized cities, party control does NOT predict crime
Example:
- Some Republican‑led cities have high violent crime rates (e.g., Jacksonville, Tulsa, Oklahoma City).
- Some Democratic‑led cities have lower rates than expected for their size.
Crime rose and fell nationally under both parties
The 2020 spike happened
nationwide, including in Republican‑led cities.The 2022–2024 declines also happened
nationwide.
Conclusion: There is
no consistent causal link between party control and crime rates.