Trump caving to Iranian demands to end the war without any resolution of Iran's nuclear program?

Has the US accepted Iran’s demand to settle Hormuz first, nuclear later?​

US and Iran close to agreeing to a one-page MoU to end the war, even though there have been no detailed negotiations on Tehran’s nuclear programme.

Islamabad, Pakistan – On Monday morning, the United States Navy began escorting commercial vessels through the Strait of Hormuz. By Tuesday afternoon, the operation had been paused.

President Donald Trump announced the reversal on Truth Social, citing the “request of Pakistan and other Countries” and “great progress” towards a “complete and final agreement” with Iran.

Earlier on Tuesday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared that Operation Epic Fury, the air and naval campaign launched on February 28, was “concluded”.

What Washington now sought, he said, was a “memorandum of understanding for future negotiations”.

For weeks, that is precisely what Iran has been demanding.

In proposals passed on to the US through Pakistan, Iran has in recent weeks sought multistage negotiations, with a preliminary deal aimed at ending the war, and negotiations on the White House’s demands that Tehran end its nuclear programme pushed for later.

Trump and his administration resisted, with the US president insisting that getting Iran to give up its nuclear programme was central to any deal with Tehran.

Now, the US appears to have come around to accepting Iran’s demand, say experts. On Wednesday, the Reuters news agency and the US publication Axios reported that the US and Iran were close to agreeing to a one-page MoU to end the war, even though there have been no detailed negotiations on Tehran’s nuclear programme.


After all of this, he will enter a nuclear agreement very similar to what Obama had created.
 
Nuclear has peaceful uses. It is used in medicine. It is used in research. It is used in agriculture. It is used in scientific research. Where do we get the power to say Iran cannot use it for those purposes?
 

Iran talks rife with confusion as Trump voices hope



Trump has provided few details but maintains optimism about a war-ending deal.

Iranian and Trump administration officials “offered contradictory and rapidly changing assessments of the state of the war and peace talks,” The New York Times said, all “while providing few details about those negotiations.”

Who said what​


If Iran doesn’t agree to “give what has been agreed to,” President Donald Trump said on social media Wednesday morning, the “bombing starts,” and “at a much higher level and intensity.”

Hours later, he told reporters the two sides “had very good talks over the last 24 hours” and a deal was “very possible.”

An Iranian official dismissed the proposal as an “American wish-list.”
 
Nuclear has peaceful uses. It is used in medicine. It is used in research. It is used in agriculture. It is used in scientific research. Where do we get the power to say Iran cannot use it for those purposes?


Precisely. America is not the ruler of the world.
 
Sweetheart, is this your first day here? What you call a novel is just a short note compared to my usual posts. I love to trigger you idiots with lots of words. Every libtard here struggles with reading, comprehension and they're intellectually lazy. Proof? The comment you just wrote. You're so stupid you don't realize that complaining about a couple of paragraphs is me triggering you, again.

Since you're a very slow female, I'll mansplain it to you. Libtards are like toddlers to me. As I always say they know so much that ain't so. They piss and moan about everything that's not free and easy. They usually suck at personal hygiene, many are still supported by their parents, they hate to work, they love to play with themselves, they break things when they don't get there way, they're still confused about what their genitals are for, nothing is ever their fault, etc. You get picture, right? Well, of course not, you're a moron.

Because of all those truths, when a radicalized libtard dumbass chick that is wrong about everything, lies and then tries to cover it up, just like toddlers do, it's impossible to trigger anything but laughter. It's no different than the mother that laughs at the toddler that thinks mommy didn't see them steal a cookie. Or the toddler that calls daddy a meany pants for not letting him have cake for dinner, it's cute and anything buy surprising. You'd have to be an immature idiot to get angry or triggered for toddlers acting like toddlers, someone as stupid and immature as you, for example.

You see honey girl, this is a perfect example of a short post of mine. Do you think I'm triggered? Of course you do, you're a simpleton. To wrap it up while keeping it 'short', I'd like to take a guess at who you are. You're a cock craving lesbian that's appearance would stop a freight train. (that means you're butt ugly) You're childless (thank God) You're desperately seeking answers about God from a church with a rainbow flag out front and a lesbian preacher that takes a big shit on the bible each week. You're miserable and it gets worse by the day. You blame your miserable existence on Trump as all of your peers have taught you. And I'll stop with one more guess, you have daddy issues. How did I do?
☝️
Anyone writing short novels about their petty grievances and trivial complaints is Massively Triggered :cuss:

well-family-tantrum-superJumbo.jpg
 

Fake Reports on Negotiations Are Part of a U.S. Psychological Operation




Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf reacted to reports published by the U.S. outlet Axios regarding the negotiations, describing them as part of Washington’s “psychological operations.”



In a post on X, the Iranian parliament speaker wrote: “The ‘trust me, guys’ operation failed, so now they have returned to Axios’ usual pattern of spreading fake news.”



Ghalibaf also linked the reports to recent regional developments, saying the publication of such claims was an attempt by the United States to shape the media narrative following what he described as a “major defeat” in military operations in the Strait of Hormuz.



He further criticized Axios, calling it “the main source of fake news for the White House,” and coined the term “Fauxios” — derived from the English word faux, meaning fake or false — to refer to the outlet.
 
☝️
Anyone writing short novels about their petty grievances and trivial complaints is Massively Triggered :cuss:

well-family-tantrum-superJumbo.jpg
LOL, Sweetheart honeypot, I noticed you've gone the other way. A few words and pictures. Good move, the more you talk the dumber you sound. You're still trying to convince people I'm triggered by exposing you're a lying moron. lmfao If you want to see a long post check out my last one.

The fact is, you're obviously still super triggered about being exposed as the fool you are, by me. How do I know, you won't stop whining like a little spoiled bitch. You can't deal with the fact I embarrassed the hell out of you. If I'm triggered, I want to be triggered all the time, it's a great feeling. One I'm used to, it seems to always happen when I prove libtards are simpletons. Keep them coming, I love reminding people.
 

Has the US accepted Iran’s demand to settle Hormuz first, nuclear later?​

US and Iran close to agreeing to a one-page MoU to end the war, even though there have been no detailed negotiations on Tehran’s nuclear programme.

Islamabad, Pakistan – On Monday morning, the United States Navy began escorting commercial vessels through the Strait of Hormuz. By Tuesday afternoon, the operation had been paused.

President Donald Trump announced the reversal on Truth Social, citing the “request of Pakistan and other Countries” and “great progress” towards a “complete and final agreement” with Iran.

Earlier on Tuesday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared that Operation Epic Fury, the air and naval campaign launched on February 28, was “concluded”.

What Washington now sought, he said, was a “memorandum of understanding for future negotiations”.

For weeks, that is precisely what Iran has been demanding.

In proposals passed on to the US through Pakistan, Iran has in recent weeks sought multistage negotiations, with a preliminary deal aimed at ending the war, and negotiations on the White House’s demands that Tehran end its nuclear programme pushed for later.

Trump and his administration resisted, with the US president insisting that getting Iran to give up its nuclear programme was central to any deal with Tehran.

Now, the US appears to have come around to accepting Iran’s demand, say experts. On Wednesday, the Reuters news agency and the US publication Axios reported that the US and Iran were close to agreeing to a one-page MoU to end the war, even though there have been no detailed negotiations on Tehran’s nuclear programme.


Iran has him by the short and curlys. They are gonna squeeze every concession they can get.
 
LOL, Sweetheart honeypot, I noticed you've gone the other way. A few words and pictures. Good move, the more you talk the dumber you sound. You're still trying to convince people I'm triggered by exposing you're a lying moron. lmfao If you want to see a long post check out my last one.

The fact is, you're obviously still super triggered about being exposed as the fool you are, by me. How do I know, you won't stop whining like a little spoiled bitch. You can't deal with the fact I embarrassed the hell out of you. If I'm triggered, I want to be triggered all the time, it's a great feeling. One I'm used to, it seems to always happen when I prove libtards are simpletons. Keep them coming, I love reminding people.
Ooh, lotta butt-hurt in that post.

You gonna be OK, snowflake?
 
Back
Top