Just gets more comical by the day

archives

Verified User

“Democrats cry foul over DOJ official representing Bondi in Epstein interview”​

“House Democrats are sounding the alarm about the Justice Department’s purported plan for Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon to represent former Attorney General Pam Bondi in her “official capacity” during an interview with lawmakers about the agency’s handling of the Epstein files.”

The Oversight Committee’s Republican majority last week announced that Bondi, ousted by President Donald Trump in April, would sit for a “transcribed interview” with lawmakers later this month on her compliance with federal law requiring the Justice Department to publish documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation.”

“The committee’s top Democrat contended that Dhillon’s attendance on behalf of the former attorney general would violate House rules governing depositions, which stipulate that counsel representing a witness can only consist of two “nongovernmental attorneys” and that other people “including government agency personnel” can’t attend.”

“Democrats were summarily excluded from deliberations with Bondi and her legal team that resulted in the transcribed interview later this month, a fact confirmed by Comer himself.”


Too funny, what’s the point of even interviewing Bondi, couldn’t be anymore of a transparent white wash, MaraLago probably has the script already written, and surely Comer will go on right wing media and announce that the Committee was fully satisfied with the disposition showing Bondi’s innocence
 

“Democrats cry foul over DOJ official representing Bondi in Epstein interview”​

“House Democrats are sounding the alarm about the Justice Department’s purported plan for Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon to represent former Attorney General Pam Bondi in her “official capacity” during an interview with lawmakers about the agency’s handling of the Epstein files.”

The Oversight Committee’s Republican majority last week announced that Bondi, ousted by President Donald Trump in April, would sit for a “transcribed interview” with lawmakers later this month on her compliance with federal law requiring the Justice Department to publish documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation.”

“The committee’s top Democrat contended that Dhillon’s attendance on behalf of the former attorney general would violate House rules governing depositions, which stipulate that counsel representing a witness can only consist of two “nongovernmental attorneys” and that other people “including government agency personnel” can’t attend.”

“Democrats were summarily excluded from deliberations with Bondi and her legal team that resulted in the transcribed interview later this month, a fact confirmed by Comer himself.”


Too funny, what’s the point of even interviewing Bondi, couldn’t be anymore of a transparent white wash, MaraLago probably has the script already written, and surely Comer will go on right wing media and announce that the Committee was fully satisfied with the disposition showing Bondi’s innocence
Four years brandon was in charge. If there was anything to bring forward it would have already been done. Don't you ever get tired of whining, "get trump"? A whole decade and you haven't succeeded yet. He even dodged your literal bullets.
 

“Democrats cry foul over DOJ official representing Bondi in Epstein interview”​

“House Democrats are sounding the alarm about the Justice Department’s purported plan for Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon to represent former Attorney General Pam Bondi in her “official capacity” during an interview with lawmakers about the agency’s handling of the Epstein files.”

The Oversight Committee’s Republican majority last week announced that Bondi, ousted by President Donald Trump in April, would sit for a “transcribed interview” with lawmakers later this month on her compliance with federal law requiring the Justice Department to publish documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation.”

“The committee’s top Democrat contended that Dhillon’s attendance on behalf of the former attorney general would violate House rules governing depositions, which stipulate that counsel representing a witness can only consist of two “nongovernmental attorneys” and that other people “including government agency personnel” can’t attend.”

“Democrats were summarily excluded from deliberations with Bondi and her legal team that resulted in the transcribed interview later this month, a fact confirmed by Comer himself.”


Too funny, what’s the point of even interviewing Bondi, couldn’t be anymore of a transparent white wash, MaraLago probably has the script already written, and surely Comer will go on right wing media and announce that the Committee was fully satisfied with the disposition showing Bondi’s innocence
Poor anchovies, the complete unredacted Epstein files have been available to all Congressional members since the first week of Feb 9, 2026.
 
First I didn't say it was anyone's "fault" and second you didn't address what I actually said. What a shocker
Address what, the same lame narrative that if there were anything there Biden would have expose it? I know it is hard for the hate driven MAGA to comprehend, but Garland wasn’t consumed by retribution as Trump has directed his ass kissers

And the comedy is that it was MAGA, even Trump himself, who resurrected the Epstein files, and now their trying to ignore them
 
Address what, the same lame narrative that if there were anything there Biden would have expose it? I know it is hard for the hate driven MAGA to comprehend, but Garland wasn’t consumed by retribution as Trump has directed his ass kissers

And the comedy is that it was MAGA, even Trump himself, who resurrected the Epstein files, and now their trying to ignore them
Did brandon have control of the doj for 4 years or not?

You can shit your pants all you like but the answer is yes and as big a hard on as you idiots have for trump you would have creamed your shorts to get the word out about trunks involvement with Epstein
 
Did brandon have control of the doj for 4 years or not?

You can shit your pants all you like but the answer is yes and as big a hard on as you idiots have for trump you would have creamed your shorts to get the word out about trunks involvement with
I think the one recently released euphemistic birthday card Trump sent Epstein alone proves you wrong
 
Address what, the same lame narrative that if there were anything there Biden would have expose it? I know it is hard for the hate driven MAGA to comprehend, but Garland wasn’t consumed by retribution as Trump has directed his ass kissers

And the comedy is that it was MAGA, even Trump himself, who resurrected the Epstein files, and now their trying to ignore them
Poor anchovies,
Poor anchovies, the complete unredacted Epstein files have been available to all Congressional members since the first week of Feb 9, 2026.
 
Is that the evidence you want to bring to court? I really try to take you people serious but it's so difficult
Ah, your claim was that if there was dirt on Trump in the files Biden would have released it to embarrass Trump, and I gave you a perfect example showing you were wrong, you got nothing
 

“Democrats cry foul over DOJ official representing Bondi in Epstein interview”​

“House Democrats are sounding the alarm about the Justice Department’s purported plan for Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon to represent former Attorney General Pam Bondi in her “official capacity” during an interview with lawmakers about the agency’s handling of the Epstein files.”

The Oversight Committee’s Republican majority last week announced that Bondi, ousted by President Donald Trump in April, would sit for a “transcribed interview” with lawmakers later this month on her compliance with federal law requiring the Justice Department to publish documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation.”

“The committee’s top Democrat contended that Dhillon’s attendance on behalf of the former attorney general would violate House rules governing depositions, which stipulate that counsel representing a witness can only consist of two “nongovernmental attorneys” and that other people “including government agency personnel” can’t attend.”

“Democrats were summarily excluded from deliberations with Bondi and her legal team that resulted in the transcribed interview later this month, a fact confirmed by Comer himself.”


Too funny, what’s the point of even interviewing Bondi, couldn’t be anymore of a transparent white wash, MaraLago probably has the script already written, and surely Comer will go on right wing media and announce that the Committee was fully satisfied with the disposition showing Bondi’s innocence
are you marxists still prattling on about Epstein?

admit it, you only care about because of the 47th Amendment

you never posted about it when Sleepy Joe was limping through his term
 
are you marxists still prattling on about Epstein?

admit it, you only care about because of the 47th Amendment

you never posted about it when Sleepy Joe was limping through his term
How many times does one have to keep repeating facts to MAGAs?

It was MAGA, even Trump himself, who resurrecting the Epstein files, not Democrats, MAGAs, Donnie even promised on day one he was going to publicly release all the files, get your facts straight
 
How many times does one have to keep repeating facts to MAGAs?

It was MAGA, even Trump himself, who resurrecting the Epstein files, not Democrats, MAGAs, Donnie even promised on day one he was going to publicly release all the files, get your facts straight
Poor anchovies, the complete unredacted Epstein files have been available to all members of Congress since the first week of Feb 9, 2026.
 

“Democrats cry foul over DOJ official representing Bondi in Epstein interview”​

“House Democrats are sounding the alarm about the Justice Department’s purported plan for Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon to represent former Attorney General Pam Bondi in her “official capacity” during an interview with lawmakers about the agency’s handling of the Epstein files.”

The Oversight Committee’s Republican majority last week announced that Bondi, ousted by President Donald Trump in April, would sit for a “transcribed interview” with lawmakers later this month on her compliance with federal law requiring the Justice Department to publish documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation.”

“The committee’s top Democrat contended that Dhillon’s attendance on behalf of the former attorney general would violate House rules governing depositions, which stipulate that counsel representing a witness can only consist of two “nongovernmental attorneys” and that other people “including government agency personnel” can’t attend.”

“Democrats were summarily excluded from deliberations with Bondi and her legal team that resulted in the transcribed interview later this month, a fact confirmed by Comer himself.”


Too funny, what’s the point of even interviewing Bondi, couldn’t be anymore of a transparent white wash, MaraLago probably has the script already written, and surely Comer will go on right wing media and announce that the Committee was fully satisfied with the disposition showing Bondi’s innocence
Yep, trump administration doing everthing they can to cover for trump and other pedophiles.
 
Back
Top