DOJ Indicts Southern Poverty Law Center for Secretly Funneling MILLIONS to Members of White Supremacist and Extremist Groups

Uncensored2008 said:
Ah, you're lying as always. Hillary and Barry da Fairy both publicly denied Trump won in 2016. But then they went further, and tried to overthrow the executive branch of the United States government.

There's a word for that. Oh right, "TREASON."



Even to this day the traitors who are the pedocrat party defend the attempted coup by Obama's goons. Your party tried to stage a coup because you refused to accept that Trump won the election.
Click to expand...

1) “Hillary and Obama denied Trump won in 2016”​


Referring to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama


❌ Misleading


  • Clinton publicly conceded the election the day after the vote and acknowledged that Donald Trump would be president.
  • Obama also publicly affirmed the election outcome and oversaw a peaceful transfer of power.

What did happen:


  • Both Democrats and Republicans raised concerns about Russian interference in the 2016 election (a separate issue from denying the outcome).

👉 Saying they “denied Trump won” conflates criticizing interference with rejecting the result—those are not the same.



2) “They tried to overthrow the executive branch”​


❌ Not supported by evidence


This appears to refer to:


  • the FBI investigation into Russian interference
  • the Mueller investigation

Findings:


  • The investigation documented Russian interference
  • It did not conclude that a coordinated attempt by Obama officials to overthrow the government existed

There is no credible evidence of an organized coup attempt by the Obama administration or Democratic leadership.



3) “That’s treason”​


❌ Incorrect use of the term


In the U.S., treason has a very specific legal definition tied to:


  • levying war against the country, or
  • aiding enemies in wartime

Political investigations, public criticism, or intelligence probes do not meet that standard.



4) “Attempted coup by Obama’s goons / your party”​


❌ False / conspiratorial framing


  • There is no verified evidence of a coordinated “coup” attempt by Democrats after the 2016 election
  • Investigations into election interference and possible misconduct are legal processes, not coups—even if people disagree with them


5) Language and bias patterns​


This statement shows several strong bias signals:


  • Name-calling / dehumanization (“Barry da Fairy,” “pedocrat party”)
  • Assertion without evidence (“as always,” “they tried to overthrow”)
  • Inflation of claims (turning investigations into “treason” or “coup”)
  • Partisan framing (“your party”)
  • Certainty without sourcing

These patterns usually indicate persuasion or anger, not factual analysis.



Bottom line​


  • ✔ It’s true that there were investigations and political disputes after 2016
  • ❌ It is not true that Clinton or Obama denied the election outcome in the sense of refusing the result
  • ❌ There is no credible evidence of a Democratic “coup” or “treason”
  • ❌ The statement relies heavily on insults, exaggeration, and unsupported claims
 
We know Trump used the Justice Department as a weapon of punishment and it is getting case after case thrown out. The center denies the charges. Even with all the failures of Trump's vendettas and phony prosecutions, the Trumpys all jump on board again. You guys know they are guilty, don't you? You do not.
 
Grim Reaper said:
Ah, the dulcet tones of a terminally online troll whose entire personality is a sad little cocktail of impotent rage and third-rate edgelord posturing. How charmingly predictable, like watching a chihuahua try to hump a bulldog, only less dignified and with significantly more drool.

Let’s dissect this masterpiece of mediocrity, shall we? Your attempt at an insult reads like a drunk uncle’s Facebook rant after his fifth Natty Light, except even he would’ve had the decency to pass out before hitting post. Calling someone a dichead is the verbal equivalent of bringing a plastic spork to a gunfight, adorably pathetic, but mostly just sad. And oh, the irony of whining about AI while your own original thoughts smell like a compost heap of Fox News soundbites and unwashed incel angst.

But here’s the real kicker, you’re not even good at being a troll. You’re the human equivalent of a participation trophy, vaguely insulting, utterly forgettable, and destined to collect dust in the bargain bin of irrelevance. Every word you spew is a desperate plea for attention from a world that stopped caring about you around the same time your parents did.

So go ahead, reply to this. I know you will. It’s the only human interaction you’ll get today, and we both know your DMs are just crickets and spam from Russian bot farms. Enjoy the echo chamber, champ. The rest of us will be over here, laughing at you, not with you, because let’s be real, you’re not smart enough to be in on the joke.
Click to expand...
Brutal! 😲😆
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Ah, you're lying as always. Hillary and Barry da Fairy both publicly denied Trump won in 2016. But then they went further, and tried to overthrow the executive branch of the United States government.

There's a word for that. Oh right, "TREASON."



Even to this day the traitors who are the pedocrat party defend the attempted coup by Obama's goons. Your party tried to stage a coup because you refused to accept that Trump won the election.
Click to expand...
Prove it, I can easily prove Trump not only denied the election he lost but even did his best to overturn the voters choice, you prove Hillary did the same

And now in addition to Democrats shooting Reagan plus the Pope involved in human trafficking we have Obama leading a coup, as I said, it only gets richer by the post
 
archives said:
Prove it,
Click to expand...

Prove what, that water is wet?

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUqxX0YAafg


archives said:
I can easily prove Trump not only denied the election he lost but even did his best to overturn the voters choice, you prove Hillary did the same
Click to expand...

What?

ROFL

archives said:
And now in addition to Democrats shooting Reagan plus the Pope involved in human trafficking we have Obama leading a coup, as I said, it only gets richer by the post
Click to expand...

Now in addition to being a pathological liar, you're an election denier.

And of course barking mad, toys in the attic, three wheels short of a set.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Prove what, that water is wet?

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUqxX0YAafg




What?

ROFL



Now in addition to being a pathological liar, you're an election denier.

And of course barking mad, toys in the attic, three wheels short of a set.
Click to expand...

🔎 The claim​


“Hillary Clinton claims the 2016 election was ‘stolen’ from her.”
Click to expand...


✅ Fact check​


  1. What actually happened in 2016
    • Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by about 2.9 million votes.
    • Donald Trump won the Electoral College, which determines the presidency in the U.S.
  2. Clinton’s statements
    • Clinton has publicly said the election “was a shock” and that “Russia interfered” to influence the outcome.
    • She has criticized foreign interference and voting system vulnerabilities, but she does not claim Trump’s win was literally “stolen” by fraud in the sense of altering ballots or counting.
  3. What she has said about the result
    • In interviews and speeches, she emphasizes:
      • Russian interference in social media and hacks
      • Voter suppression in certain states
    • These statements address factors that affected the election, not that the election was outright stolen by Trump or his campaign.


⚖️ Bias / framing​


  • “Stolen” narrative: Some outlets or social media accounts summarize Clinton’s comments as “the election was stolen,” which simplifies and exaggerates her point.
  • Context collapse: Criticizing interference or unfair practices is not the same as alleging she was robbed of the presidency in a legal sense.


✅ Bottom line​


  • ❌ Clinton did not claim the 2016 election was literally stolen by Trump.
  • ✔ She has said the election was affected by Russian interference and other unfair factors.
  • ❌ Simplifying it to “she claims it was stolen” is misleading and inaccurate.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Prove what, that water is wet?

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUqxX0YAafg




What?

ROFL



Now in addition to being a pathological liar, you're an election denier.

And of course barking mad, toys in the attic, three wheels short of a set.
Click to expand...
“Claims,” and plotting a coup ain’t the same, duh, besides, did she recognize the election, yes, did she try to invalidate the voters choice, no, apples and oranges

I’m lying, you denying now you didn’t state above Obama’s coup?

No matter what pseudonym you employ your post are always hilarious
 
Here's why?

hq720.jpg

images.jpg

and here's really why

images (1).jpg

This shyte is so boring already...I think most people around the world now know the USA's Public Institutions and financial system have been totally captured by the Khazarian Travelling Circus....
 
James said:
Damn! You got me Boss! What to do?...I say Chrrristie done it!!!! Yeah?
Click to expand...
what to do.......


hmmm.......

this fascism is actually a national problem.

I would say start viciously attacking "libertarian" sellouts who are now just naked fascists belittling victims of their corporatist/fascist evil.

see t.a. gardner.

start attacking t.a. on the regular.

this may not make a difference but its fucking satisfying.

and get all prayed up.

t.a.'s policy on those laid off by AI is to throw them in a wood chipper.
 
Ichabod Stain said:
what to do.......


hmmm.......

this fascism is actually a national problem.

I would say start viciously attacking "libertarian" sellouts who are now just naked fascists belittling victims of their corporatist/fascist evil.

see t.a. gardner.

start attacking t.a. on the regular.

this may not make a difference but its fucking satisfying.

and get all prayed up.

t.a.'s policy on those laid off by AI is to throw them in a wood chipper.
Click to expand...
...this fascism is actually a national problem.

There's your Problem Squire....

This Fascism is a Global Problem, viciously protected by Antisemitism and Holocaust Denial.
 
James said:
...this fascism is actually a national problem.

There's your Problem Squire....

This Fascism is a Global Problem, viciously protected by Antisemitism and Holocaust Denial.
Click to expand...
yes.

fascism is internationalist now.

its protected by libertarian pro-fascist perversion of free trade concepts, and perversion of what freedom fundamentally means.
 
Damocles said:
SLPC: Not enough racism happening, what should we do?

More SLPC: Let's pay Larry to go make some happen!

SLPC: Great idea! Go! This will never backfire on us, and nobody will ever get hurt!
Click to expand...
The real reason the MAGAts are pissed at a group they've hated for years is that the SPLC paid MAGA leaders to report on the inner workings of their hate groups. I doubt this case will go any further than any other of Trump's frivolous lawsuits.

The MAGAt program of weaponizing the DOJ continues with the full support of all JPP MAGAts.

https://theconversation.com/trump-a...y-lack-evidence-of-criminal-wrongdoing-281310
The Justice Department is focusing on how the SPLC secretly paid informants working inside the Ku Klux Klan and other organizations the SPLC viewed as white supremacy and hate groups.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top