religion as a wedge and patriotism as a bludgeon

[Jarod]

you forgot harry reid [/QUOTE]

Harry pointed out that it cant be prevented by the government.

 

[cawacko]

REid said what Obama said, he just added a bit more which was his personal opinion, because he is a federal official I dont belive he should have due to the 1st amendment.

Reid said what quite a few have said. You just don't seem to have a problem with it because it's a guy you agree with politically.

 

[Jarod]

Reid said what quite a few have said. You just don't seem to have a problem with it because it's a guy you agree with politically.

I dont disagree with what Reid said. My problem is that he should not express his personal opinion because he is a federal official sworn to uphold the Constitution.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

I dont disagree with what Reid said. My problem is that he should not express his personal opinion because he is a federal official sworn to uphold the Constitution.

Where do you get these bullshit notions?

 

[Jarod]

Where do you get these bullshit notions?

I dont belive that elected officials should be out trash talking something that everyone agrees is constitutionally protected. Especally the president who has taken an oath to protect and defend the constitution....

That is my opinion...

If you are out attacking a religen for doing something that is constitutionally protected... you as president have a chilling effect upon something that the Constitution requires you protect.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

I dont belive that elected officials should be out trash talking something that everyone agrees is constitutionally protected. Especally the president who has taken an oath to protect and defend the constitution....

That is my opinion...

If you are out attacking a religen for doing something that is constitutionally protected... you as president have a chilling effect upon something that the Constitution requires you protect.

You're attacking reid for doing something constitutionally protected. Elected officials don't lose their right to free speech, you douchebag.

 

[Jarod]

You're attacking reid for doing something constitutionally protected. Elected officials don't lose their right to free speech, you douchebag.

He has a right to do it, he just should not in my opinion.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

He has a right to do it, he just should not in my opinion.

Why not? Because you prefer obamas opinion that the mosque should be built there.

 

[Jarod]

Because once it is clear that the government is prohibited from preventing the Mosque, personal opinions from someone sworn to protect and defend the Constitution are illrelevant and harmfull to the Constitution.


Its like asking a private in the army to comment on if he agrees with his orders or not.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

Because once it is clear that the government is prohibited from preventing the Mosque, personal opinions from someone sworn to protect and defend the Constitution are illrelevant and harmfull to the Constitution.


Its like asking a private in the army to comment on if he agrees with his orders or not.

No. It's not at all like the army. It's not at all like asking a private if he agrees with his orders.

 

[Jarod]

No. It's not at all like the army. It's not at all like asking a private if he agrees with his orders.

I disagree. In some ways it is.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

I disagree. In some ways it is.

In no way is it. It's not a matter of opinion.

 

[Jarod]

In no way is it. It's not a matter of opinion.

I disagree.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Because once it is clear that the government is prohibited from preventing the Mosque, personal opinions from someone sworn to protect and defend the Constitution are illrelevant and harmfull to the Constitution.

I'll say it again for you living constitutional scholars. If 'shall not be infringed' is interpreted to limit the types of arms allowed, then 'shall make no law' can be interpreted to limit the types of religious institutions that can be built.

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

The current state of islam is very radicalized and political. They need about a hundred years of reform, and set an example of allowing other religions into their societies first, before they should be trusted. They are murdering theocratic terrorists at this point, no different that a middle ages crusader ransacking islamic lands for god.

There should be no immigration from muslim controlled nations until they stop turning out brainwashed kill bots for allah with their riches.

You should be stripped of American citizenship and expelled to Somalia to die, dog.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

You should be stripped of American citizenship and expelled to Somalia to die, dog.

Why do you love Islamic Theocracy?

 

[Jarod]

I'll say it again for you living constitutional scholars. If 'shall not be infringed' is interpreted to limit the types of arms allowed, then 'shall make no law' can be interpreted to limit the types of religious institutions that can be built.

Are u saying two rings make a right?

 

[Phantasmal]

Because once it is clear that the government is prohibited from preventing the Mosque, personal opinions from someone sworn to protect and defend the Constitution are illrelevant and harmfull to the Constitution.


Its like asking a private in the army to comment on if he agrees with his orders or not.

Saying it is a mosque is a misstatement, it is a community center. They need to stop calling it a mosque. It is like calling Dimond High where they hold Christian services on Sundays a church. There will be prayer rooms, but it will also have basketball and teach chefs.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Are u saying two rings make a right?

derail

try again.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

Saying it is a mosque is a misstatement, it is a community center. They need to stop calling it a mosque. It is like calling Dimond High where they hold Christian services on Sundays a church. There will be prayer rooms, but it will also have basketball and teach chefs.

It's a NICE mosque, no doubt, but still a mosque.

the "it isn't a mosque" argument is a failure.