Poll: Should all reactions generate a positive score?

Should every reaction bring positive points?

  • Total voters
    12
  • This poll will close: .
Damocles said:
The score would be pointless either way. Getting people to react would give you points... It's more of a "any press is good press" kind of thing... We want interaction.
Click to expand...
Special rules, selective enforcement of rules, one-way Forced Ignore and all your other ideas to protect MAGAts, especially Legina, is not conducive to promoting interaction.

If you want interaction, remove the forced ignores and ban socks....although I confess to enjoying watching Sybil pos rep himself with his socks. LOL
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Special rules, selective enforcement of rules, one-way Forced Ignore and all your other ideas to protect MAGAts, especially Legina, is not conducive to promoting interaction.

If you want interaction, remove the forced ignores and ban socks....although I confess to enjoying watching Sybil pos rep himself with his socks. LOL
Click to expand...
You, sir, are a troll. You believe you "win" every time I have to make a new modification to end another path that you use to troll people. I'd say about 4% of your posts have some value, the rest are you either whining about me, or you trying to use board functions to "poke" at someone you think is a "MAGAt" or that you want others to think is a "MAGAt"...

There are no special rules, only "special" people....

You wanted him forced to ignore you so badly that you wouldn't pay any attention to what you were doing.
 
Damocles said:
The goal is interaction, you get to express how much you like or dislike the other person's post. Since the interaction is happening should it all be positive points? I can create more "reactions", and I think it may stop those who think these points can be spent like cash from constantly reacting...
Click to expand...
There should be a number of positive interactions and a number of negative interactions. You could easily add a ratio score as well. For example, the number of positive responses compared to the number of posts, and again the same calculation for the negative reactions. That would tell a story. The way it is now tells us nothing at all. @TOP has a negative 24000 which only tells us the level of immaturity, reinforcing what we all know about libtards' very nature. We already know this, so it has no value. It would be far more interesting to see how many positive reactions she's had and how many negative reactions separately. That's useful.
 
Damocles said:
You, sir, are a troll. You believe you "win" every time I have to make a new modification to end another path that you use to troll people. I'd say about 4% of your posts have some value, the rest are you either whining about me, or you trying to use board functions to "poke" at someone you think is a "MAGAt" or that you want others to think is a "MAGAt"...

There are no special rules, only "special" people....

You wanted him forced to ignore you so badly that you wouldn't pay any attention to what you were doing.
Click to expand...
Oh, Damocletus. I bet you never called Legina a "troll" over all the years you two have shared together even though most people know her to be a troll.

No doubt she loves the one-way forced ignore you provided her along with the Diogenes forced ignore. :thup:
 
Moosakofsky said:
If I cared why don’t you see me giving any negs? I don’t think I’ve ever given one.
Click to expand...
You care by whining, bitching and moaning about it.

What effect does it have on you, anymouse? Do you lose money? Does it deprive you of liquor? Does it limit your participation on the forum? If the answer is "NO" to all of those questions then you're just proving you are a whiney little beotch who is only complaining because it's me, not Earl.
 
Moosakofsky said:
I doubt anyone cares about those stupid negs.
Would you?
Click to expand...
You care because you are whining and bitching about it. How many times does this have to be pointed out to you???

Why is this even topic of discussion if not for all of Damo's MAGAts like you whining about bad ol' Dutch?
 
CBHype said:
What about eliminating all negative reactions. Problem solved.
Click to expand...
That would take away all their joy.... Just let them nag and bond..... (But no need to notify or tally.... A person can see if someone reacted to their post.. And isn't that all that's necessary? You let the person know you are less than pleased with what they said... Or is there an ulterior motive?)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top