Poll: Should all reactions generate a positive score?

Should every reaction bring positive points?

  • Total voters
    11
  • This poll will close: .
Damocles said:
The goal is interaction, you get to express how much you like or dislike the other person's post. Since the interaction is happening should it all be positive points? I can create more "reactions", and I think it may stop those who think these points can be spent like cash from constantly reacting...
Click to expand...
Of course the poll is going to be NO. There are more rabid leftist Rats on this forum.
 
CBHype said:
Of course the poll is going to be NO. There are more rabid leftist Rats on this forum.
Click to expand...
This is not the first time Damo wanted to do this. A favorable poll would give him cover in doing it. If the poll is for "No" then he has to just enact another "special rule" and face the heat.
 
Damocles said:
The goal is interaction, you get to express how much you like or dislike the other person's post. Since the interaction is happening should it all be positive points? I can create more "reactions", and I think it may stop those who think these points can be spent like cash from constantly reacting...
Click to expand...
Maybe making into neutrals would work. That way, you can give someone the reaction they deserve without giving them a positive mark. The positive marks for negative responses make the whole thing pointless.
 
CBHype said:
I started doing what the forum Rats do
Slash as many lefties as I can
Click to expand...
You're free to do so for not but "special rules for special people" is how this is going.

All of the things I've done on this forum were allowed in the rules so Damo makes new rules or simply enforces them selectively such as Forced Ignore....which isn't in the rules. Heck, he even created a special rule for me and bragged about it even though it was his GF Legina who I learned it from. He's threatened to ban me several times through selective enforce of the rules. Weird!

Damocletus is too weak to just man up and admit that's what he's doing. How many people on JPP are on Forced Ignore? Are any of them MAGAts or are they all "leftists" as he calls them?

Damocles

Thread 'New Rule... Rule 16'

We'll call this new rule the Dutch Uncle rule.

Quote Box Altering:

One can alter a quote box by removing some of a wall of text to expose the specific part you are responding to, or splitting it apart so you can respond to each item one at a time. However, altering the words posted and changing the meaning of what they said for whatever reason (a joke for instance) is not allowed unless you change the "quoted by" portion of the quote to make it clear that the original poster did not post what you are "making" them say. We will begin by deleting these posts, and if it continues we will...

He changed the title of this thread from my original:

In this thread he threatened to ban me for posting "porn" when the reality is that he was protecting his GF Legina. LOL
 
Jade Dragon said:
Maybe making into neutrals would work. That way, you can give someone the reaction they deserve without giving them a positive mark. The positive marks for negative responses make the whole thing pointless.
Click to expand...
The score would be pointless either way. Getting people to react would give you points... It's more of a "any press is good press" kind of thing... We want interaction.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top