Iran War Watch

The Demonic Empire bombed Chinese rail projects in Iran...part of the Belt and Road.....which is stunningly stupid when you are already losing.
 
The Chinese have promised to nuke the zionist colony out of existence if any nukes are dropped on Iran, and have told Iran that China has their back.

I have seen reports that the Pakistanis', the Russians and the North Koreans have all offered to help, but I tend to doubt the Pakistani claim.
 
The way it was reported to me is that the Iranians had no interest is the constant calls from the Empire for a pause.....they are winning....but the Chinese asked them too.

In return China has Irans back from here.....not just weapons and intel.....all in.
 
Also noticed that the Brits lied yet again.....they said no use of Rump of UK for the war crimes in Iran.

But when the operation was called off there were bombers fully loaded headed to Iran.....from UK runways.
 

Ryan Rozbiani

@RyanRozbiani



JUST IN : Iran Does Not Trust The U.S., Army is Ready to RestartAmir Akrami Nia, Spokesperson for Iran's Army:We have no trust in the enemy under ceasefire conditions. The army is awake and fully prepared The Americans, especially Trump, have proven that they are not trustworthy at all; our hand is on the trigger and our ears are on the command of the Supreme Commander of the Armed ForcesThe enemy showed that he is not trustworthy in the JCPOA and two rounds of negotiations, but considering the blows he has received, we hope he will come to his senses.
 
Peter is going to be in Trouble if the Russians outlaw vapes....as they have been considering.....dont know what is up with that over the last few months.
 
Putin said something the other day that boils down to "The West is going to continue to do self harm for awhile, but eventually they are going to figure it out".
 
What struck me most about this war was how casually the United States made the decision to launch a war. Iran itself did not possess the resolute will to develop nuclear weapons. Iranian society as a whole, including its leadership, was ideologically quite pro-Western, exhibiting considerable vacillation. It was precisely this vacillation that made China unwilling to view Iran as a reliable anti-Western force. Iran lacked a strong will to confront the West. This is not surprising, given the extremely complex situation within Iran. Under these circumstances, military action against Iran was entirely unnecessary. The only plausible explanation was to restrict China's access to oil. But isn't it inherently evil to attack a sovereign nation simply to prevent China from buying some cheap oil? There was absolutely no need. Americans have a "I can do it, so I did it; no other reason is needed" mentality. I don't know where things went wrong. But it seems that American rulers are incapable of thinking positively. Their thinking is always, "I'm going to hurt some countries, create destruction, threaten some country, and force them to obey my orders." This seems to have become a prevalent way of thinking in the American political arena—completely offensive and relying entirely on absolute force.
 
Furthermore, some Americans on this forum have surprised me. They firmly believe that Iran possesses a large quantity of Chinese-made weapons, which is not actually true. Why insist so strongly that Iran has a large number of Chinese weapons? Just to prove that Chinese weapons are junk? Is it acceptable to disregard the truth in order to achieve one's desired viewpoint? Why are Americans like this? I am extremely confused.
 
Jack Grealish said:
Furthermore, some Americans on this forum have surprised me. They firmly believe that Iran possesses a large quantity of Chinese-made weapons, which is not actually true. Why insist so strongly that Iran has a large number of Chinese weapons? Just to prove that Chinese weapons are junk? Is it acceptable to disregard the truth in order to achieve one's desired viewpoint? Why are Americans like this? I am extremely confused.
Click to expand...
As I am pretty sure I told you the very smart Chinese decided to field test their gear in a real war.
 
Mario Nawfal



@MarioNawfal

The inside story of how the war started is more damning than anyone imaginedThe New York Times just published the most detailed account yet of Trump's decision to attack Iran. Every American should read it.February 11th. Netanyahu arrives at the White House for a classified Situation Room briefing. Mossad on the screens behind him. He plays Trump a video montage of potential new Iranian leaders, including the exiled son of the Shah. He tells Trump regime change is within reach. The missile program can be destroyed in weeks. Iran won't be able to close Hormuz. Retaliation against U.S. interests would be "minimal."Trump's response: "Sounds good to me."Every single one of those assurances turned out to be wrong. Iran closed Hormuz. Retaliation hit six countries. The missile program survived underground. The regime consolidated power instead of collapsing. And 44 days later, Trump accepted a ceasefire on Iranian terms.February 26th. The final Situation Room meeting. Trump goes around the table. Vance: "You know I think this is a bad idea, but if you want to do it, I'll support you." Rubio: "If the goal is regime change, we shouldn't do it." Cheung, the comms director, warned it contradicted everything they'd said for eight months about Iranian nuclear facilities being destroyed. The CIA director said regime change was possible "if we just mean killing the supreme leader."Nobody said no.Everyone deferred to the president's instincts.The Treasury Secretary and Energy Secretary, the two people who would need to manage the largest oil supply disruption in history, weren't even in the room. Neither was the Director of National Intelligence.The next day, aboard Air Force One, 22 minutes before the military deadline, Trump sent six words: "Operation Epic Fury is approved. No aborts. Good luck."Source: New York Times
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top