Chuck Schumer on the "SAVE Act"

[AProudLefty]

It turns out that this is true. Certain California counties will be automatically enrolling illegals to vote unless the SAVE act is implemented.

That is false.

California Won't Register 'Illegal' Voters - FactCheck.org

Q: Is California planning to “automatically register illegal immigrants to vote”? A: No. The headline making that claim is false and misrepresents the law in California. FULL ANSWER It’s true that California has taken considerable steps to protect immigrants living in the U.S. illegally, a...

www.factcheck.org

Must suck to be so wrong all the time.

Rest of drivel dismissed.

 

[IBDaMann]

That is false.

It's true, and you are gullible for believing everything you read on the internet. Too funny. Must suck to be so wrong all the time.

 

[Yakuda]

Chuck Schumer: "The SAVE Act is Jim Crow 2.0. More than 20 million people would lose their right to vote."

Question: How many CITIZENS would lose their right to vote?
Answer: Zero.

He's talking about the 20 million people crazy joe let in.

 

[Yakuda]

That is false.

California Won't Register 'Illegal' Voters - FactCheck.org

Q: Is California planning to “automatically register illegal immigrants to vote”? A: No. The headline making that claim is false and misrepresents the law in California. FULL ANSWER It’s true that California has taken considerable steps to protect immigrants living in the U.S. illegally, a...

www.factcheck.org

Must suck to be so wrong all the time.

What your article doesn't show is how California determines if someone is a citizen or not.

 

[gfm7175]

1. Pay attention; the claim that illegals with DL are automatically registered to vote is false.

No it isn't.

2. As a security ensure, you can't have non citizens traveling on planes (i.e., 9-11 prevention.

You don't want a "security ensure" for elections? Wonder why.........

3. Stop lying and denying. The Brennan Center and others FACTUALLY PROVE otherwise.

?????

4. To get all the documents the Save America Act requires takes time and money.,

To get all the documents required to fly domestically takes time and money. Meh.

which would be to late to vote in the mid-terms should the bill pass. That means legal native born Americans who have voted for years would deny disenfranchised. And the GOP traditionally does better with low voter turnout. Capice?

Nowadays, the GOP does better with higher turnout and the Democrats do better with higher fraud.

 

[Crepitus]

Absolutely irrelevant. Apparently you are looking for a forfeit.

Absolutely not.

 

[Taichiliberal]

No it isn't.

You don't want a "security ensure" for elections? Wonder why.........

?????

To get all the documents required to fly domestically takes time and money. Meh.

Nowadays, the GOP does better with higher turnout and the Democrats do better with higher fraud.

1. Then PROVE otherwise with documented FACTS. To date, all the noise from the MAGA GOP and it's minions cannot ... instead they just keep repeating debunked talking points. Here's something else for you to deny:

Voter Registration and Verification of Eligibility to Vote​

All states are required to use the same voter registration form for registering people to vote in federal elections. The form requires applicants to affirm, under penalty of perjury, that they are citizens.

Many people are automatically registered to vote when they apply for a driver’s license. In some cases, this can lead to noncitizens mistakenly being registered to vote, though states regularly conduct audits of their databases to remove ineligible voters. Typically, voter names are purged because of death, a move, or criminal conviction. The vast majority are U.S. citizens.

States verify voter identity and eligibility to vote using databases such as those from the federal Social Security Administration or state departments of motor vehicles. Some election officials have attempted large-scale voter rolls purges, but in many cases, the people removed were naturalized U.S. citizens who had to be reinstated. The Texas acting secretary of state resigned in 2019 after his office wrongly questioned the U.S. citizenship of nearly 100,000 people.

Voting-rights advocates have expressed opposition to proposed measures such as the SAVE Act, which would prescribe methods for proving U.S. citizenship, because millions of U.S.-born citizens do not have ready access to birth certificates or passports and could be prevented from exercising their right to vote.

www.migrationpolicy.org/content/noncitizen-voting-us-elections

2. See #1 and stop wondering.

3. Lord, you gave them eyes yet they do not see. www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/new-save-act-bills-would-still-block-millions-americans-voting

4. Think stupid, THINK. If you're going to fly commerical, the vast majority of Americans have DL, SocSec or a credit card LONG before they arrive at the terminal, as they usually book a flight on-line or through a travel agent. The Save America Act requires native born and naturalized citizens who have been legally voting for YEARS to suddenly acquire documents to re-register if the Act passes. Getting a copy of your birth certificate or a passport takes time and a some cash. That time line could not be met by the mid-term elections, effectively disenfranchising a multitude of voters .... and the GOP traditionally does better with low voter turnout.

5. Tell that to the GOP candidates losing in special elections all over the country. Tell that to the conservative think tanks who are sounding the alarm bells, or the many pollster who are ranking the GOP across the board at record low approval ratings. This is why Dump wants that SAA bill to pass so bad, because without it his endorsements officially become toxic (if not already).

 

[Diogenes]

https://twitter.com/x/status/2033717957025472584

View: https://x.com/SenMikeLee/status/2033717957025472584?s=20

 

[Diogenes]

https://twitter.com/x/status/2033727833629921286

View: https://x.com/WesternLensman/status/2033727833629921286?s=20

 

[Jake Starkey]

"Lose their right to vote..."

None. You either have the right to vote or you don't. For example, if you commit a felony and go to prison you lose your right to vote while serving time. In some states you permanently lose that right.

I don't see how the SAVE Act does that.

As for Schumer's other statement, "Jim Crow 2.0" it shows he's either knowingly spewing rhetorical bullshit or he has no clue what the 'Jim Crow' era entailed. I'd assume it's the latter as Schumer doesn't seem to be the sharpest tool in the shed.

 

[gfm7175]

4. Think stupid, THINK. If you're going to fly commerical, the vast majority of Americans have DL, SocSec or a credit card LONG before they arrive at the terminal, as they usually book a flight on-line or through a travel agent. The Save America Act requires native born and naturalized citizens who have been legally voting for YEARS to suddenly acquire documents to re-register if the Act passes. Getting a copy of your birth certificate or a passport takes time and a some cash. That time line could not be met by the mid-term elections, effectively disenfranchising a multitude of voters .... and the GOP traditionally does better with low voter turnout.

You really don't hear yourself, do you? You're basically telling me that it's easy to acquire documents for domestic flights but difficult to acquire the very same documents for voting in domestic elections. You're certifiably nuts........

You accept needing documents in order to fly domestically but you reject needing documents in order to vote domestically. Obviously Team Donkey NEEDS election fraud.

 

[Jake Starkey]

SAVE Act is unneeded and a waste of money.

 

[Taichiliberal]

You really don't hear yourself, do you? You're basically telling me that it's easy to acquire documents for domestic flights but difficult to acquire the very same documents for voting in domestic elections. You're certifiably nuts........

You accept needing documents in order to fly domestically but you reject needing documents in order to vote domestically. Obviously Team Donkey NEEDS election fraud.

please take a refresher course in reading comprehension. Either that or get an adult to explain what I previously wrote, because your revisionist clap trap looks comical in print.

I'll dumb it down for you; the SAA requires those who don't have a passport or a copy of their birth certificate.to get one for voter registration. THAT takes time, and the bill has NOT passed the Senate yet. Now, look at when the mid-terms take place and find out the turn around time and cost to get a birth certificate copy, much less a passport. Then get an adult to explain the word disenfranchise. Get cracking, gumby.

 

[Diogenes]

https://twitter.com/x/status/2034457208683962819

View: https://x.com/HawleyMO/status/2034457208683962819?s=20

 

[gfm7175]

please take a refresher course in reading comprehension. Either that or get an adult to explain what I previously wrote, because your revisionist clap trap looks comical in print.

I'll dumb it down for you;

the SAA requires those who don't have a passport or a copy of their birth certificate.to get one for voter registration. THAT takes time,

the TSA requires those who don't have a passport or a copy of their birth certificate.to get one for domestic flights. THAT takes time,

Yet, you don't whine about that. Only for voting in elections do you whine about that. Why?

** Note: I purposely referenced 'birth certificate' for stylistic reasoning, but it's technically a 'real ID' (or similar) that is required, and a birth certificate is required in order to get such an ID (or similar).

and the bill has NOT passed the Senate yet.

The TSA requirements are already in effect.

Yet, you don't whine about that. Only for voting in elections do you whine about that. Why?

Now, look at when the mid-terms take place

Tuesday, November 3rd 2026. (229 days from today)

and find out the turn around time

This varies greatly. It could be as quick as the very same day (for in-person services) or it could take multiple weeks (for mail services). Personally, I would obtain one well in advance of when I would need it, but it doesn't take anywhere near 229 days to obtain one.

and cost to get a birth certificate copy,

This varies by state, but in Wisconsin, it costs $20 for the first copy (+$3 for any additional copies ordered at the same time) plus fees for any additional services provided (such as expedited service).

much less a passport.

Passport book = $165 total fees
Passport card = $65 total fees
Passport book + card combo = $195 total fees
Additional service fees may also apply.

It could take a month or two (or possibly longer) to obtain a passport... nowhere near 229 days.

Then get an adult to explain the word disenfranchise. Get cracking, gumby.

What about getting an adult to explain the word 'proactive'?
Get cracking, pokey.

 

[Jake Starkey]

Show me a factual need for a voter id card.

The SAVE Act will not pass.

 

[gfm7175]

Show me a factual need for a voter id card.

Already did, but you go like this:

The SAVE Act will not pass.

I'm not expecting it to pass (because Team Elephant [especially its leadership] are a sniveling controlled opposition subsidiary of Team Donkey), but it COULD pass (and quite frankly it SHOULD pass).

 

[Jake Starkey]

Already did, but you go like this:

I'm not expecting it to pass (because Team Elephant [especially its leadership] are a sniveling controlled opposition subsidiary of Team Donkey), but it COULD pass (and quite frankly it SHOULD pass).

No, you assert it, but there is no factual need. There is no documented problem. It will not pass, and it should not.

 

[QP!]

please take a refresher course in reading comprehension. Either that or get an adult to explain what I previously wrote, because your revisionist clap trap looks comical in print.

I'll dumb it down for you; the SAA requires those who don't have a passport or a copy of their birth certificate.to get one for voter registration. THAT takes time, and the bill has NOT passed the Senate yet. Now, look at when the mid-terms take place and find out the turn around time and cost to get a birth certificate copy, much less a passport. Then get an adult to explain the word disenfranchise. Get cracking, gumby.

And lets not forget this VERY WEIRD ruling the Supreme Court made...

--------

- Supreme Court Ruling (Feb 2026): In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the federal law shielding the Postal Service from liability includes the "intentional non-delivery of mail".

--------------


So with Trump's guy Louis De Joy picking the head who replaced him, and this bizarre SC ruling that says 'even if they with hold mail INTENTIONALLY they cannot be held to any account', there is a huge risk that USPS could simply deliberately not deliver any new IDs on time and even if every staff member came out and said 'we are purposely withholding all Blue State id's'... the SC has ensured that nothing could be done.

And also do not forget Trump demanded Obama show his birth certificate record and when Obama did, Trump just switched to 'not good enough... does not count', so anyone thinking this stops with ID being obtained is a fool.

 

[gfm7175]

No, you assert it, but there is no factual need. There is no documented problem.

There IS an undocumented problem though... get it?

It will not pass, and it should not.