Trump crawls back to Zelensky to beg for help stopping Iranian drones

I've said it a hundred times.

You are a flaming psycho.
A hundred? Is that another lie, Marco?

Disagreed, but I'm curious if you are capable of defining why and by what definitions you declare me to be a "flaming psycho".
If you can't, I understand the language barrier.
 
A hundred? Is that another lie, Marco?

Disagreed, but I'm curious if you are capable of defining why and by what definitions you declare me to be a "flaming psycho".
If you can't, I understand the language barrier.
Fits you to a tee @Dutch Uncle

The term "flaming psycho" is not a standard or widely recognized phrase in psychology, linguistics, or common usage. It appears to be a combination of two distinct concepts:

  • Flaming: Refers to hostile, aggressive, or insulting online behavior, often involving profanity, personal attacks, or inflammatory language. This is commonly seen in internet forums, social media, or email exchanges, where individuals engage in "flame wars."
  • Psycho: A colloquial or informal term often used to describe someone perceived as mentally unstable, irrational, or emotionally extreme—though it is not a clinical diagnosis.
When combined, "flaming psycho" may be used informally or sarcastically to describe someone who is both emotionally volatile and prone to aggressive or insulting online behavior. However, this phrase is not a formal psychological term and should not be used in clinical or academic contexts. It likely reflects a subjective judgment rather than a defined condition.

There is no evidence from the provided sources that "flaming psycho" is a recognized psychological concept or diagnosis.
 
Fits you to a tee @Dutch Uncle

The term "flaming psycho" is not a standard or widely recognized phrase in psychology, linguistics, or common usage. It appears to be a combination of two distinct concepts:

  • Flaming: Refers to hostile, aggressive, or insulting online behavior, often involving profanity, personal attacks, or inflammatory language. This is commonly seen in internet forums, social media, or email exchanges, where individuals engage in "flame wars."
  • Psycho: A colloquial or informal term often used to describe someone perceived as mentally unstable, irrational, or emotionally extreme—though it is not a clinical diagnosis.
When combined, "flaming psycho" may be used informally or sarcastically to describe someone who is both emotionally volatile and prone to aggressive or insulting online behavior. However, this phrase is not a formal psychological term and should not be used in clinical or academic contexts. It likely reflects a subjective judgment rather than a defined condition.

There is no evidence from the provided sources that "flaming psycho" is a recognized psychological concept or diagnosis.
It's good that a Brazilian can use Google to define a term but obviously connecting that to my posts is more difficult for you, Marco.
 
Ukraine was a total waste for the USA. They don't have oil... they ain't got shit we're really interested in and really the problem is Europe's not ours.

The USA and UK and Russia all made a commitment to defend Ukraines borders if they voluntarily gave up the 3rd largest nuclear stockpile in the world at that time.

The original sin here is Russia invading after that agreement but then Obama and the UK gov't not instantly sending troops into Ukraine to help defend it, as promised. That told Putin he can do what he wants.

Biden and Trump have also been disasters. Never again would or should a country give up nukes for any promise.
 
The USA and UK and Russia all made a commitment to defend Ukraines borders if they voluntarily gave up the 3rd largest nuclear stockpile in the world at that time.

The original sin here is Russia invading after that agreement but then Obama and the UK gov't not instantly sending troops into Ukraine to help defend it, as promised. That told Putin he can do what he wants.

Biden and Trump have also been disasters. Never again would or should a country give up nukes for any promise.
I guess it's a good thing we're destroying the nuclear capability of Iran, a terrorist nation, before they can threaten the world. Too bad we didn't do that to North Korea. Previous Presidents did not have the same resolve that Trump has.
 
I guess it's a good thing we're destroying the nuclear capability of Iran, a terrorist nation, before they can threaten the world. Too bad we didn't do that to North Korea. Previous Presidents did not have the same resolve that Trump has.
The problem is, we have not destroyed it. Iran has developed a concrete that resists bunker busters and put their nuclear facilities deep in the mountains.


 
I guess it's a good thing we're destroying the nuclear capability of Iran, a terrorist nation, before they can threaten the world. Too bad we didn't do that to North Korea. Previous Presidents did not have the same resolve that Trump has.
A word of advice. When you are feeling threatened and sounding the alarm for 40 years about the IMMINENT threat of Iran's weapons, it is NOT a thing.

You got duped.
 
Well, we know that was a mistake and only strengthened Iran.
And Israel called for Saddam to be taken out as a threat for decades before the US finally acted to take out that "imminent" threat.

And Israel called for the take out of Iran for decades and upped it once Iraq was out, to take that "imminent" threat.

And NOW that Iran has been hit Israel has started to point that war drum beat at Turkey saying they are the imminent future threat.

It make take decades of them beating that drum but when America takes Turkey out, you can count on one thing... Magats will cheer it and say they were an "imminent threat" just as they did at the time or Iraq and now Iran.


Meanwhile i will say 'a multi decade "imminent" anything" is not a real threat. IT is a fake you fall for every single time.
 
And Israel called for Saddam to be taken out as a threat for decades before the US finally acted to take out that "imminent" threat.

And Israel called for the take out of Iran for decades and upped it once Iraq was out, to take that "imminent" threat.

And NOW that Iran has been hit Israel has started to point that war drum beat at Turkey saying they are the imminent future threat.

It make take decades of them beating that drum but when America takes Turkey out, you can count on one thing... Magats will cheer it and say they were an "imminent threat" just as they did at the time or Iraq and now Iran.


Meanwhile i will say 'a multi decade "imminent" anything" is not a real threat. IT is a fake you fall for every single time.
You are absolutely wacked. Turkey? That will never happen..........a NATO member for 74 years.
You certainly know how to talk shit.
 
You are absolutely wacked. Turkey? That will never happen..........a NATO member for 74 years.
You certainly know how to talk shit.
It is not me starting that drum beat and is the man say many will be the next Prime Minister of Israel.

And you seem to have forgotten Iraq was an ally and Saddam was the US chosen leader and puppet, before he was not any more.

 
Back
Top