Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
Let me try again, which candidates in which elections did GM support or oppose through its contribution to the CBC Foundation?
ask and answered
Let me try again, which candidates in which elections did GM support or oppose through its contribution to the CBC Foundation?
ask and answered
I hear they have patches on their underwear. I'm surprised you didn't see that when you were blowing The Obama.
Please come to AZ. I'll show you where the lost dutchman mine is.
3 hikers on treasure hunt in Superstitions feared dead
Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/community/...g-for-treasure-feared-dead.html#ixzz0vqtsEpRc
would you make it the patch a star of david?
What?
No. Greed and smarts rules the day.I believe you are as insane as the 3 that got lost and died. Greed and stupidity killed them, sound familiar?
I believe the phrase you are looking for is "asked and answered." And your answer is stupid. The CBC Foundation has nothing to do with campaigns and elections. That's why it's irrelevant to the topic of discussion.
typo nazi
no nigel, you're just a stupid partisan, that is why my complex answer baffles you....it is still corps giving to politicians and you can't tell me that giving the cbc more money is not going to help them get reelected...now that is just plain stupid
do you need a quarter to gain some sense![]()
It isn't corporations giving money to anyone in connection with any election or any campaign. Target's was. Like I said before, you have this odd notion that if someone disagrees with a particular corporation giving money to a particular entity for a particular campaign or election purpose that the person disagrees with, the person can't simply take issue with that particular corporation's contribution but must denounce all corporate contributions to anyone anywhere for any purpose. That's stupid.