11.3 Billion!

Lionfish said:
True. I feel sorry for you, watching you constantly be dismantled with facts is heartbreaking.
Stop your knee-jerk posts and gather your facts first, and that will help minimize the number of times you have to be corrected.
Click to expand...
Well that is hard to do while you are selling car warranties.
 
Jarod said:
What would 60% do on an ICBM, which Iran did not have.
Click to expand...
Iran has put satellites in space and that is the same technology needed for ICBMs. Most experts say it is easy to enrich 60% uranium to 95%.

AI Overview



Enriching uranium from 60% to 90%+ (weapons-grade) is technically faster and easier than the initial, difficult process of reaching 60%
. Because the majority of

is already removed, less material needs processing, allowing for a rapid, final jump in concentration, often using the same, existing centrifuge technology.

Key Aspects of the Process:
  • Nonlinear Efficiency: The process is not linear; higher concentrations require less effort to achieve higher purity.
 
FastLane said:
Iran has put satellites in space and that is the same technology needed for ICBMs. Most experts say it is easy to enrich 60% uranium to 95%.

AI Overview



Enriching uranium from 60% to 90%+ (weapons-grade) is technically faster and easier than the initial, difficult process of reaching 60%
. Because the majority of

is already removed, less material needs processing, allowing for a rapid, final jump in concentration, often using the same, existing centrifuge technology.

Key Aspects of the Process:
  • Nonlinear Efficiency: The process is not linear; higher concentrations require less effort to achieve higher purity.
Click to expand...
So Trump lied when he said Irans Nuclear program was obliterated?
 
FastLane said:
Iran has put satellites in space and that is the same technology needed for ICBMs. Most experts say it is easy to enrich 60% uranium to 95%.

AI Overview



Enriching uranium from 60% to 90%+ (weapons-grade) is technically faster and easier than the initial, difficult process of reaching 60%
. Because the majority of

is already removed, less material needs processing, allowing for a rapid, final jump in concentration, often using the same, existing centrifuge technology.

Key Aspects of the Process:
  • Nonlinear Efficiency: The process is not linear; higher concentrations require less effort to achieve higher purity.
Click to expand...
Putting Satellites in space is not the same as having an ICBM, ICBM requires Re-Entry thus an ability to survive intense heat and accurate guidance.

But your scenario is not helping your cause.

They could put a dirty bomb in a ship in NY harbor and it would be a mess, this WAR is not preventing that in any way.
 
Jarod said:
We have systems that would have easily prevented that. 60% is not bomb material. Lots of angry nations COULD do that.
Click to expand...
Natural uranium, as mined, contains approximately 0.72% of the fissile isotope Uranium-235

It is much easier and faster to refine 60% uranium. to 95% than to go from natural uranium to 35%

45,000 Kg of uranium will make 480 kg of 60% . 480Kg of 60% uranium will make 300kg of 95%

It is not linear.
 
FastLane said:
Natural uranium, as mined, contains approximately 0.72% of the fissile isotope Uranium-235

It is much easier and faster to refine 60% uranium. to 95% than to go from natural uranium to 35%

45,000 Kg of uranium will make 480 kg of 60% . 480Kg of 60% uranium will make 300kg of 95%

It is not linear.
Click to expand...
ok
 
FastLane said:
So are you comfortable with Iran having 480KG of 60% and the technology to build bombs and ICBMs?
Click to expand...
They do not have technology to build ICBM’s.

Was their nuclear program obliterated?

I’m uncomfortable with a lot of nations having nuclear weapons, that includes Iran.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top