Chuck Schumer on the "SAVE Act"

[gfm7175]

That means he knows there's at least 20 million ineligible voters on the rolls.
How can it not?!

Team Donkey wholly depends on their dead person, multiple person, illegal alien, and improperly-filled-and-counted-ballot constituencies in order to "win" via election fraud.

 

[Jake Starkey]

Chuck Schumer: "The SAVE Act is Jim Crow 2.0. More than 20 million people would lose their right to vote."

Question: How many CITIZENS would lose their right to vote?
Answer: Zero.

They lose their right vote if they don't have an unnecessary voter ID.

 

[Ross Dolan]

I'm still waiting for you to list ONE name of ONE citizen who would lose his right to vote because of the SAVE Act.

Wait for as long as you want. It is not necessary to name one citizen who would lose his right to vote, because that is not what was being defended.

But as I said, explaining something as fundamental as that to one of your ilk, is useless. I'm totally content to just laugh at you.

Chuck Schumer is saying that some 20 million people would lose their right to vote (obviously Chucky believes that illegal aliens have the right to vote). Team Donkey is the party of illegal aliens.

What Chuck Schumer said is NOT what is being contested here. I am discussing what TA asserted. And I have provided a name. So...continue to make a fool of yourself...and I will continue to laugh at you. I am sure there are others joining me.

 

[gfm7175]

They lose their right vote if they don't have an unnecessary voter ID.

They lose their right booze if they don't have an unnecessary photo ID?

 

[gfm7175]

Wait for as long as you want. It is not necessary to name one citizen who would lose his right to vote, because that is not what was being defended.

But as I said, explaining something as fundamental as that to one of your ilk, is useless. I'm totally content to just laugh at you.

What Chuck Schumer said is NOT what is being contested here. I am discussing what TA asserted. And I have provided a name. So...continue to make a fool of yourself...and I will continue to laugh at you. I am sure there are others joining me.

I don't think you even know what you're addressing anymore, if you ever did.

 

[Jake Starkey]

The right to vote is guaranteed with you register to vote. No voter ID is required, and it won't be.

 

[Ross Dolan]

I don't think ...

Incredible self-observation.

Good for you.

 

[Monad Portal]

The right to vote is guaranteed with you register to vote. No voter ID is required, and it won't be.

illegals will not be voting anymore.

sorry, traitor.

 

[Jake Starkey]

Very good, Ross Dolan. gfm's assertion that he does not think is outstanding.

 

[gfm7175]

Incredible self-observation.

Good for you.

Poor Frank.....

 

[Lionfish]

On the other hand, this thread may show that gfm7175 and T. A. Gardner are assholes trying to sell the reich wing bullshit as something other than bullshit that only morons suppose is worthwhile.

I mean...could be!

That Depends frankie.

 

[LurchAddams]

Chuck Schumer: "The SAVE Act is Jim Crow 2.0. More than 20 million people would lose their right to vote."

Question: How many CITIZENS would lose their right to vote?
Answer: Zero.

The security of our elections is fine. 2020 was deemed the "most secure election ever".

You don't want elections secure - you want anyone not voting your way prevented from voting at all.

 

[LurchAddams]

"Lose their right to vote..."

None. You either have the right to vote or you don't. For example, if you commit a felony and go to prison you lose your right to vote while serving time. In some states you permanently lose that right.

I don't see how the SAVE Act does that.

As for Schumer's other statement, "Jim Crow 2.0" it shows he's either knowingly spewing rhetorical bullshit or he has no clue what the 'Jim Crow' era entailed. I'd assume it's the latter as Schumer doesn't seem to be the sharpest tool in the shed.

Republicans have discovered after 2020 that their ideas suck to the majority of Americans. For that reason they know they can't win elections fairly. Better to declare any elections you lose, "fraudulent" and then refuse to leave office.

You're a liar, a traitor, and a cuck.

Also a bitch - sorry, bitch, almost forgot.

 

[LurchAddams]

You didn't answer the question.
T.A. Gardner did, though. He's also absolutely correct that one cannot lose what one has never possessed.

Can you point to any citizen who is losing the right to vote under the SAVE Act?

Yes. You are requiring every woman who changed her name to find her birth certificate to prove she's who she says she is. Most women now vote Democrat. So you are trying to implement a "Jim Crow" type voting system.

And none of this is even necessary because the security of our elections is fine - if only Republican would stop claiming their "fraudulent" every time they lose.

Also, shit-stain if Democrats are such "great cheaters" how do you explain them owning all chamber of government.

You can't.

 

[LurchAddams]

No, he answered with a certainty.

That's why you can't point to one single citizen who would lose his right to vote under the SAVE Act. In fact, you can't even point to one single illegal alien who would lose his right to vote under the SAVE Act.

He KNOWS that the answer is zero. I likewise know the answer to be zero.

Then you would be able to point to ONE citizen who is losing his right to vote.

Point me to ONE citizen who is losing his right to vote under the SAVE Act. I'm waiting.

How do you explain:

Bill Barr, Chis Wray, and everyone in trump's administration claiming that the 2020 election was "the most secure in history"?

How do you explain - if "Democrats are such cheaters" that you now own all 3 branches of government?

You can't. You're full of shit.

My advice to you and @T. A. Gardner : Start coming up with good ideas or even ANY ideas regarding how to govern and you might start winning elections again.

Right now - you suck.

 

[gfm7175]

The security of our elections is fine. 2020 was deemed the "most secure election ever".

... and 2016 was deemed "Russian meddling", and 2024 was deemed "Russian meddling"...

You don't want elections secure -

YOU don't want elections secure.

you want anyone not voting your way prevented from voting at all.

I want cheating/fraud to be as difficult as possible.

 

[Jake Starkey]

We have secure elections. The latest investigation of Fulton County voting records will show that again.

 

[gfm7175]

Yes. You are requiring every woman who changed her name

A majority of married women vote Republican btw.

to find her birth certificate to prove she's who she says she is.

Most people have their birth certificate at home. It is also quite easy to obtain an official copy of one (for a small fee).

Why don't you want voters' identities to be proven?

Most women now vote Democrat.

... and most married women, who are the most common women to change their names, vote Republican.

So you are trying to implement a "Jim Crow" type voting system.

What's a "Jim Crow" voting system?

And none of this is even necessary because the security of our elections is fine -

2000 - "hanging chads" "election fraud"
2004 - "election fraud" "voter suppression"
2016 - "Russian collusion" "Trump is illegitimate" Hilary Clinton (in 2019): “You can run the best campaign, you can even become the nominee, and you can have the election stolen from you.”
2018 (& 2021) - Stacey Abrams called the Georgia gubernatorial election "rigged" and "stolen".
2020 - Clinton told Biden he: "should not concede under any circumstances"
2024 - "Russian interference"
2026 - Jasmine Crockett says her primary election was "rigged" against her.

if only Republican would stop claiming their "fraudulent" every time they lose.

See above. That's just a few examples since 2000.

Also, shit-stain if Democrats are such "great cheaters" how do you explain them owning all chamber of government.

You can't.

???

 

[gfm7175]

How do you explain:

Bill Barr, Chis Wray, and everyone in trump's administration claiming that the 2020 election was "the most secure in history"?

Easy.

How do you explain - if "Democrats are such cheaters" that you now own all 3 branches of government?

Team Lion only controls the Presidency... CONgress is currently controlled by Team Elephant (Team Donkey's subsidiary). The Judiciary is split 3-3-3, but is headed ("controlled") by Team Elephant (Team Donkey's subsidiary).

You can't. You're full of shit.

YOU need to point to one citizen who is losing his right to vote due to the SAVE Act.

My advice to you and @T. A. Gardner : Start coming up with good ideas or even ANY ideas regarding how to govern and you might start winning elections again.

Right now - you suck.

Says the person who literally just claimed that "(I) now own all 3 branches of government".

Which is it, dude?

 

[LurchAddams]

... and 2016 was deemed "Russian meddling", and 2024 was deemed "Russian meddling"...

Irrelavent. No Democrat has ever refused to leave office claiming the election was fraudulent.

YOU don't want elections secure.

I don't have to. They already are. Trump's own officials said so in 2020.

I want cheating/fraud to be as difficult as possible.

No. You want to prevent anyone from voting Democrat. You trump's screwed us with his tariffs and illegal war - now you're looking for a way to cheat to keep power.

Our elections are already secure.