Drudge: 1 JUDGE VOIDS 7,000,000 VOTERS...

:lolup:

damn that third branch of our government, how dare they interpret the constitution!!!

and btw...they weren't all liberals....but do continue to repeat that falsehood

here is hint: that precedence is called law :)

you've cited no law btw

You haven't explained how they bent the 14th to conform with this new decision using reason and logic. Because you can't.
 
If a majority voted for slavery to be reinstated, would it be Constitutional to do so?

Granted, this is a horrible strawman, I agree with the principle. If 100% of Americans vote to restrict free speech or violate someone's civil liberties, the courts are still obligated to do their sacred duty and strike it down.
 
nothing was bent....

1. marriage is a fundamental right
2. people cannot vote away our fundamental rights

next
How is it a fundamental right? Lots of folks want to get married but can't find someone compatible. Zappas is an example of that.
 
How is it a fundamental right? Lots of folks want to get married but can't find someone compatible. Zappas is an example of that.
I know you are just trying to be funny, you missed, and I know you know the difference between rights and abilities, or must we draw you all a picture with our crayons?
 
I know you are just trying to be funny, you missed, and I know you know the difference between rights and abilities, or must we draw you all a picture with our crayons?
If crayons are wha you write with, then by all means knock yourself out.

But the Constitution guarantees "the pursuit of happiness", not happiness. Personally I'd be happy with three wives:
1. Real nerdy and smart, to make a living and support me;
2. One big and fat to cook for me;
3. One sexy and hot, to, well, you know.
 
If crayons are wha you write with, then by all means knock yourself out.

But the Constitution guarantees "the pursuit of happiness", not happiness. Personally I'd be happy with three wives:
1. Real nerdy and smart, to make a living and support me;
2. One big and fat to cook for me;
3. One sexy and hot, to, well, you know.
Well, look, with the change on gay marriage, you may well have the ability to have three wives soon, it honestly wouldn't bother me one bit, but you might have to check with wife #1! Women are kind of funny about those things, these days. There was a time when they couldn't protest, but now, it is a different world, at least, here in the West and you could always move to where they allow a man to have multiple wives, try Utah!
 
If crayons are wha you write with, then by all means knock yourself out.

But the Constitution guarantees "the pursuit of happiness", not happiness. Personally I'd be happy with three wives:
1. Real nerdy and smart, to make a living and support me;
2. One big and fat to cook for me;
3. One sexy and hot, to, well, you know.
Crayons are easier to hold with these old decrepit hands of mine!
 
Well, look, with the change on gay marriage, you may well have the ability to have three wives soon, it honestly wouldn't bother me one bit, but you might have to check with wife #1! Women are kind of funny about those things, these days. There was a time when they couldn't protest, but now, it is a different world, at least, here in the West and you could always move to where they allow a man to have multiple wives, try Utah!
So you, as a liberal, would be OK with multiple spouse marriages. Just as I suspected, the slippery slope argument is valid. :good4u:
 
Crayons are easier to hold with these old decrepit hands of mine!
Try this, its not as messy!

visionBoardBlackLG.jpg


:eek:
 
nothing was bent....

1. marriage is a fundamental right
2. people cannot vote away our fundamental rights

next
No one is preventing anyone from "marrying".....and no one is voting on fundamental rights in reality....

but the society nor government has the obligation to condone or recognize any marriage it they so desire...

Get married yurt and go fuck your asses off until they bleed...no one will stop you.....just don't expect others to congratulate you on your wedding if they don't wany to.....
 
The federals have to make the laws of equality so the state laws and employee requirements will fall in line and protect the people from the predators. When states and businesses don't do the right thing, then the Feds have to step in and gay unions are one of the examples.

I hate when people compare apples to oranges. S & M between two adults is none of my business, the same with bestiality, if that is what an adult wishes to do and they have the consent of the animal, it is none of my business.

And you are just ignorant on pedophilia, it is like rape, the child does not consent and must be protected. This is not the case of two consenting adult who are in love.
It is just stupid to pretend that any of the issues you mentioned are even on the same level as the others.

Marriage may have been set up to be for a man and woman, but it isn't the wonderful. sacred institution you all are trying so hard to protect from the homosexuals.
Absolutly right little girl....society has rules and government makes laws and we all live by agreed to regulations.....thats what a society does for its own good.....and one of those rules is NO to sex with minors....NO to rape....NO to sex with animals and NO to marriage between same sex people....
\Society draws the line where society draws the line.....tough shit.....you can't please everybody....
"Marriage" was NEVER recognized between same sex couples,....NEVER in this society anyway......even people other than homos have rights too....rights to determine as a society what is acceptable and what is NOT...
and you must have assumed it was you that made the rules we live by....think again....but you sure can continue to work to change those rules and others work to enforce those rules....
 
Back
Top