Putin has now lost two of his allies

Jack Grealish said:
China gets about 15% to 20% of its oil from Venezuela and Iran. If the U.S. takes control of those countries, China would have little choice but to turn to Russia for more oil. That would push China and Russia closer together. Military actions against Venezuela and Iran will be recorded in history books as the spark that ignited World War III.
Click to expand...
War is bad for business. Proxy wars are okay but a nuclear war means the game is over for everyone.
 
anonymoose said:
I have no boundaries. I just want to know more about your gender fluid god.
Should be an easy question for you.
Let me know if that’s all you know about he/she.
Click to expand...
Should be easy for you to speak first. And, no, it is S/he. Get it right. That is the first step to your enlightenment. Do some study own your own, for it seems desperately needed.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Trump is repeating that mistake in Iran.
Click to expand...
Disagree.
Typically of Trump he’s all over the place with his objectives. He’s the King of Chaos.
Here’s my assessment:
He hates the Iranian mullahs. Big factor with him, it’s personal.
He and Netanyahu are hoping to emasculate Iran’s military capabilities.
Those two are buddies.
He wants to out-Putin Putin. Show the world who’s the boss.

An American president pursuing foreign heads of state in their homes and offices, unchecked by Congress, has also flipped the script on Mr. Putin, who has made his appetite for risk, willingness to use force and unpredictability central to his coercive power in the world.

I seriously doubt regime change is the ultimate goal, only a hopeful one.
 
Jake Starkey said:
Should be easy for you to speak first.
Click to expand...
Why? I asked you first. You obviously can’t give an answer. Now you want mine?
“God” is an undefined inanimate excuse to explain what isn’t understood.
Jake Starkey said:
And, no, it is S/he. Get it right. That is the first step to your enlightenment. Do some study own your own, for it seems desperately needed.
Click to expand...
So that’s all you know about your god. S/he is gender fluid. OK.
 
anonymoose said:
No, their VP took over the job like in any democracy . She was not installed.
Click to expand...
ok so in Iran it is Ayatollah Alireza Arafi who was in line to be the next Supreme Leader of Iran and he has been named so do you think Trump should support that? Do you? Since that is what is normal in their society.
 
QP! said:
The Trump admin is looking at all the various religious militia groups in and around Iran to see if they can prop any up with weapons and support to launch a boots on the ground within Iran, in the same way they helped pushed Saddam Hussain to power in the past.
Click to expand...
None of us know for sure but I suspect he has objectives that he’s not willing to make public.
Unpredictably is his MO. Part of his negotiating strategy.
Not necessarily defending his actions but I do believe that’s how he thinks.
 
anonymoose said:
Disagree.
Typically of Trump he’s all over the place with his objectives. He’s the King of Chaos.
Here’s my assessment:
He hates the Iranian mullahs. Big factor with him, it’s personal.
He and Netanyahu are hoping to emasculate Iran’s military capabilities.
Those two are buddies.
He wants to out-Putin Putin. Show the world who’s the boss.

An American president pursuing foreign heads of state in their homes and offices, unchecked by Congress, has also flipped the script on Mr. Putin, who has made his appetite for risk, willingness to use force and unpredictability central to his coercive power in the world.

I seriously doubt regime change is the ultimate goal, only a hopeful one.
Click to expand...

See, that is a good analysis.
 
anonymoose said:
Why? I asked you first. You obviously can’t give an answer. Now you want mine?
“God” is an undefined inanimate excuse to explain what isn’t understood.

So that’s all you know about your god. S/he is gender fluid. OK.
Click to expand...
So you reply with an assertion fallacy. Why do you believe in a one gender God, instead of a God who makes a fluidity of sexual conditions?

If you are Christian, please inform us to which expression of it do you adhere.
 
Jake Starkey said:
So you reply with an assertion fallacy. Why do you believe in a one gender God,
Click to expand...
Assumption fallacy. I don’t believe in a god. Something nonexistent cannot possibly have any gender, fluid or not
Jake Starkey said:
instead of a God who makes a fluidity of sexual conditions?

If you are Christian, please inform us to which expression of it do you adhere?
Click to expand...
I’m not a Christian. What makes you think I am?
 
anonymoose said:
I have no boundaries. I just want to know more about your gender fluid god.
Should be an easy question for you.
Let me know if that’s all you know about he/she.
Click to expand...
God is the ultimate mixture. He contains everything. In Hebrew, there is no gender-neutral term, so that's why in Hebrew, God is neither masculine nor feminine. He's both.
 
anonymoose said:
Assumption fallacy. I don’t believe in a god. Something nonexistent cannot possibly have any gender, fluid or not

I’m not a Christian. What makes you think I am?
Click to expand...
Wanted to make sure. And you don't understand logic.

You have committed "A bare assertion fallacy happens when someone states a conclusion without offering any supporting argument, evidence, or reasoning."

Examples:
  • “God cannot exist.”
  • “There is no way God exists.”
  • “It’s impossible for God to exist.”
If no argument is given, it’s simply an unsupported claim — a bare assertion.
 
anonymoose said:
Why? I asked you first. You obviously can’t give an answer. Now you want mine?
“God” is an undefined inanimate excuse to explain what isn’t understood.

So that’s all you know about your god. S/he is gender fluid. OK.
Click to expand...
Wow. A MAGAt who admits he's an atheist. That's different. :)

God is not limited by physical limitations such as a body much less sex. What sex is a burning bush? :thinking:
 
anonymoose said:
Disagree.
Typically of Trump he’s all over the place with his objectives. He’s the King of Chaos.
Here’s my assessment:
He hates the Iranian mullahs. Big factor with him, it’s personal.
He and Netanyahu are hoping to emasculate Iran’s military capabilities.
Those two are buddies.
He wants to out-Putin Putin. Show the world who’s the boss.

An American president pursuing foreign heads of state in their homes and offices, unchecked by Congress, has also flipped the script on Mr. Putin, who has made his appetite for risk, willingness to use force and unpredictability central to his coercive power in the world.

I seriously doubt regime change is the ultimate goal, only a hopeful one.
Click to expand...
Of course you do. You're a MAGAt. What else would you do.

Now Trump is talking about boots on the ground in Iran. Do you really think this will be over in a week? A month? I hope it is, but the pain is going to last the rest of the year.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top