Trump was PERSONALLY responsible for what his companies did. Funny how you hold Clinton responsible for brand new technology and buy that Trump is free of guilt for anything his company did and is how he ran his businesses,.I'll go further.
If you want to claim that Trump is guilty of 34 felonies for bookkeeping entries someone on his staff made and were about the estimated value of real estate, but that he was ultimately responsible for them, then the Hildabeast is equally guilty of multiple felonies for violations of federal law on classified information and use of official e-mails.
The Hildabeast is a serial felon.
Did you pick 87% out of your ass?????
CEO's are not personally responsible for everything their companies do. You have to show that they were involved in some manner and that it simply wasn't a matter of some lower-level manager doing something without their knowledge.Trump was PERSONALLY responsible for what his companies did. Funny how you hold Clinton responsible for brand new technology and buy that Trump is free of guilt for anything his company did and is how he ran his businesses,.
Exactly. Good catch! The figure is closer to 96%, since the DNC was Epstein's client base.Did you pick 87% out of your ass?????
Nope. His company is responsible for what his company does. The company must pay any fines incurred by the company and must pay any restitution.Trump was PERSONALLY responsible for what his companies did.
FTFY.Funny how you hold Clinton responsible for her deliberate actions to exfiltrate classified information for the treasonous purposes of selling to the highest bidder
You never explained or justified your demands. You simply demanded that thousands of seized Epstein's kiddie porn videos be released to the public.Nope. His company is responsible for what his company does. The company must pay any fines incurred by the company and must pay any restitution.
FTFY.
That was you, not I.You never explained or justified your demands. You simply demanded that thousands of seized Epstein's kiddie porn videos be released to the public.
You never explained or justified your demands. You simply demanded that thousands of seized Epstein's kiddie porn videos be released to the public.That was you, not I.
You're kind of fast and loose with that figure, aren't you.Exactly. Good catch! The figure is closer to 96%, since the DNC was Epstein's client base.
![]()
Loose is an adjective commonly used for his type, especially when they cause Grindr to malfunction at republican conventions.You're kind of fast and loose with that figure, aren't you.
Not at all. This is where you show all of your compelling data to the contrary.You're kind of fast and loose with that figure, aren't you.
Like see your compelling data.Not at all. This is where you show all of your compelling data to the contrary.
Hang'em all, including Trump who was a Democrat at the time. I
He did not. Trump was pissed because Jeffrey stole a property he wanted to buy. He showed it to him, and Jeff bought instead of Trump. That has been well known, and Clinton said that was his understanding in his testimony.Nice try in deflecting from the truth. If Trump had used those girls (like you said) then why did Trump send him out of his Mar-a-Lago home for his sexual advances on a minor girl?
Agreed, in a rational adult world. In Trump World, he never takes responsibility to the applause of his sheeple.Trump was PERSONALLY responsible for what his companies did. Funny how you hold Clinton responsible for brand new technology and buy that Trump is free of guilt for anything his company did and is how he ran his businesses,.

You have no data to rebut? I didn't think so. We can close out the discussion here.Like see your compelling data.
Closing this discussion would be to your advantage.You have no data to rebut? I didn't think so. We can close out the discussion here.
![]()
Hillary was a big zero in computers. She knew about nothing. They came late to her life, and she always had people to rely on.CEO's are not personally responsible for everything their companies do. You have to show that they were involved in some manner and that it simply wasn't a matter of some lower-level manager doing something without their knowledge.
The Hildabeast KNEW that she could not conduct official government business on a personal e-mail server, particularly one intended to circumvent proper handling and records keeping of those e-mails. Her staff which sent e-mails to that server would have known likewise. E-mail servers and computers that support them were not "brand new technology" either. They'd been around for decades when the Hildabeast did this. As First Lady she would have known about those rules. She had years and years of experience around the government in high positions to know what the requirements were.
In the case of Bragg's charges on Trump, he had to come up with a novel means--never used before or since--to even bring charges, then had to use charge stacking to break that down into 34 charges instead of the usual one covering all instances. He then needed a complicit and compliant judge to assist in helping to get the whole thing sold to a jury.
When it didn't result in Trump not being elected, the judge decided to cut his losses and discharged the whole case without so much as a dollar in penalties. If these felony charges are so egregious, why wasn't Trump fined or jailed for them? Why did the judge just toss out any penalty whatsoever? With the Hildabeast, no charges were brough to begin with.