Let the obfuscation begin!

Um, it takes a little while to put in place procedures to oversee the disposition of $20 billion to tens (hundreds?) of thousands of claimants.

why don't you tell that to mott about his op :pke:

its been almost 2 months since the fund was agreed to....funny how you always make excuses for obama, but yet won't make the same excuses for bp
 
why don't you tell that to mott about his op :pke:

its been almost 2 months since the fund was agreed to....funny how you always make excuses for obama, but yet won't make the same excuses for bp


I answered your question. I'm not making excuses for Obama or anyone else.
 
did you click on mott's link? you should....then all will become clear


Yes, I clicked on Mott's link. I also read it. Mott didn't ask any questions, he simply posted the link. Had he asked a question, perhaps I would have addressed it.

Apparently, you didn't read Mott's link, because if you did you would not have asked your dumbass question.
 
Yes, I clicked on Mott's link. I also read it. Mott didn't ask any questions, he simply posted the link. Had he asked a question, perhaps I would have addressed it.

Apparently, you didn't read Mott's link, because if you did you would not have asked your dumbass question.

you're a hack dude...his thread title says it all...nice try, but you're not getting away that easy :pke:
 
you're a hack dude...his thread title says it all...nice try, but you're not getting away that easy :pke:


Fuck off, pissant. I ain't required to respond to everything anyone writes. You asked a dumbass question and I answered it. A simple thank you would have sufficed instead of this happy horseshit.
 
Fuck off, pissant. I ain't required to respond to everything anyone writes. You asked a dumbass question and I answered it. A simple thank you would have sufficed instead of this happy horseshit.

no...you made excuses nigel. whereas you don't offer the same answer to mott...you offer only for obama....

mott's intent with this thread was to bash bp and their slowness in getting claims resolved....you know that, yet....you don't say anything to mott about "time"...only when someone mentions the 20 billion fund overseen by obama's choice guy...do you mention time

:pke:
 
no...you made excuses nigel. whereas you don't offer the same answer to mott...you offer only for obama....

mott's intent with this thread was to bash bp and their slowness in getting claims resolved....you know that, yet....you don't say anything to mott about "time"...only when someone mentions the 20 billion fund overseen by obama's choice guy...do you mention time

:pke:


I thought you were asking an actual question, not merely "mentioning time." I answered it. You're welcome. Had Mott asked a question, perhaps I would have done the same. But, alas, he didn't.

I hope this helps.
 
I thought you were asking an actual question, not merely "mentioning time." I answered it. You're welcome. Had Mott asked a question, perhaps I would have done the same. But, alas, he didn't.

I hope this helps.

my apologies then....because i was asking an actual question, however, i allowed my preconceived notions of your usual responses cloud my view of your answer.

why is it do you think almost 2 months later the fund hasn't kicked in yet? i know it takes time, but the fund was supposed to streamline the claims. and yet mott and the news is still harping on bp....despite the fact they agreed to the 20 billion to be overseen by the guy who oversaw the 9/11 claims...
 
Back
Top