Trump supporters' extreme views driven by personal insecurity: research

Number Six

Verified User

PsyPost reports that a new study published in the journal Advances in Psychology suggests that White people who personally perceive themselves as ranking at the bottom of the racial economic hierarchy or “tied” with Black Americans were the most likely to support President Donald Trump.

Previous research identified a phenomenon known as “last place aversion,” where people fear being at the very bottom of a social hierarchy — and Trump voters apparently feel the sting of smallness more acutely than others, whether or not they are actually at the bottom rung of the ladder.


Surprisingly, researchers found that these attitudes were not driven by actual poverty. The researchers controlled for objective indicators of socioeconomic status, such as income and education levels. They found that belonging to the “last place” profile predicted Trump support and anti-DEI attitudes regardless of how much money or education the participant actually had.

“We … [expected] a subset of non-Hispanic, white Americans who feel ‘last place.’ That said, we expected this profile to be more likely among working class individuals,” Cooley told PsyPost. “However, perceiving oneself to be ‘last place’ was not associated with the lowest objective income nor the lowest objective education among the White Americans in our samples.”

The United States currently exhibits a significant racial wealth gap with economic statistics consistently showing that the average white family holds considerably more wealth than the average Black or Hispanic family. But despite this reality, surveys indicate that many white Americans feel they are “personally falling behind” in terms of status without realistically weighing the resources at their disposal.


“This line of research was motivated by recent political trends among some white Americans, including support for DEI bans, alignment with alt-right ideology, and endorsement of political violence in pursuit of political goals (e.g., January 6th),” said study authors Erin Cooley and Jazmin Brown-Iannuzzi, associate professors of psychology at Colgate University and the University of Virginia, respectively. “Many of these attitudes are not only extreme but also anti-democratic, raising questions about how such views can coexist with identities centered on being ‘most American’ (e.g., white nationalist belief systems).”

The tool researchers used to assess personal status was a box measure called the “Perceived Self-Group Hierarchy.” Participants viewed a diagram representing a status ladder based on money, education, and job prestige, and they were asked to place markers representing themselves, white people, Black people, Asian people, and Hispanic people onto this ladder.

Researchers found a consistent link between this “last place” profile and specific political views.


“White Americans who fit this profile reported the highest levels of support for Donald Trump throughout the campaign season. They also expressed the strongest intention to vote for him. When surveyed the day after the election, this group was the most likely to report having cast their ballot for Trump,” PsyPost reports.

This same group of insecure white people also showed “the strongest opposition to DEI programs, favoring policies that would ban such initiatives in universities.” Additionally, they showed higher alignment with alt-right ideologies, agreeing more frequently with statements such as “White people are generally under attack in the U.S.” and “The government threatens my personal rights.”
 
"PsyPost". :laugh:
Meanwhile:

Conservatives report better mental health than liberals. I think I know why. | Opinion​


  • A 2022 survey indicates conservatives report higher levels of happiness than liberals.
  • The happiness gap between liberals and conservatives is consistent across demographics.
  • A social psychologist suggests a belief in meritocracy is a strong predictor of both happiness and political ideology, with conservatives scoring higher on meritocratic beliefs.
  • The author argues that conservatives' emphasis on personal responsibility and limited government contributes to their happiness, while liberals' focus on government intervention leads to dissatisfaction.

Every time I open social media or turn on the news, I consistently see one thing: Liberals are outraged.

Whether it's fear and loathing over the Supreme Court's decision on transgender care or rioting and protesting because President Donald Trump is enforcing our nation's immigration laws, liberals are angry.

It seems like many of them enjoy being angry, too.

You know who isn't angry? Conservatives like me. And we have the data to show why.

On June 18, statistician and political analyst Nate Silver presented a detailed analysis of the 2022 Cooperative Election Study, which surveyed 60,000 Americans. Silver concluded that the survey shows that conservatives outnumber liberals 51% to 20% among people who report excellent mental health. And liberals outnumber conservatives 45% to 19% among voters who say they have poor mental health.

Silver found that the liberal-conservative mental health gap is fairly consistent across multiple demographics, including gender, race, age, education and income.






www.usatoday.com

Conservatives report better mental health than liberals. I think I know why. | Opinion

Whether it's outrage over Supreme Court decisions or protests over President Donald Trump's enforcement of immigration laws, liberals
 

PsyPost reports that a new study published in the journal Advances in Psychology suggests that White people who personally perceive themselves as ranking at the bottom of the racial economic hierarchy or “tied” with Black Americans were the most likely to support President Donald Trump.

Previous research identified a phenomenon known as “last place aversion,” where people fear being at the very bottom of a social hierarchy — and Trump voters apparently feel the sting of smallness more acutely than others, whether or not they are actually at the bottom rung of the ladder.


Surprisingly, researchers found that these attitudes were not driven by actual poverty. The researchers controlled for objective indicators of socioeconomic status, such as income and education levels. They found that belonging to the “last place” profile predicted Trump support and anti-DEI attitudes regardless of how much money or education the participant actually had.

“We … [expected] a subset of non-Hispanic, white Americans who feel ‘last place.’ That said, we expected this profile to be more likely among working class individuals,” Cooley told PsyPost. “However, perceiving oneself to be ‘last place’ was not associated with the lowest objective income nor the lowest objective education among the White Americans in our samples.”

The United States currently exhibits a significant racial wealth gap with economic statistics consistently showing that the average white family holds considerably more wealth than the average Black or Hispanic family. But despite this reality, surveys indicate that many white Americans feel they are “personally falling behind” in terms of status without realistically weighing the resources at their disposal.


“This line of research was motivated by recent political trends among some white Americans, including support for DEI bans, alignment with alt-right ideology, and endorsement of political violence in pursuit of political goals (e.g., January 6th),” said study authors Erin Cooley and Jazmin Brown-Iannuzzi, associate professors of psychology at Colgate University and the University of Virginia, respectively. “Many of these attitudes are not only extreme but also anti-democratic, raising questions about how such views can coexist with identities centered on being ‘most American’ (e.g., white nationalist belief systems).”

The tool researchers used to assess personal status was a box measure called the “Perceived Self-Group Hierarchy.” Participants viewed a diagram representing a status ladder based on money, education, and job prestige, and they were asked to place markers representing themselves, white people, Black people, Asian people, and Hispanic people onto this ladder.

Researchers found a consistent link between this “last place” profile and specific political views.


“White Americans who fit this profile reported the highest levels of support for Donald Trump throughout the campaign season. They also expressed the strongest intention to vote for him. When surveyed the day after the election, this group was the most likely to report having cast their ballot for Trump,” PsyPost reports.

This same group of insecure white people also showed “the strongest opposition to DEI programs, favoring policies that would ban such initiatives in universities.” Additionally, they showed higher alignment with alt-right ideologies, agreeing more frequently with statements such as “White people are generally under attack in the U.S.” and “The government threatens my personal rights.”
Well, let's see, it's Alternet for starters... That's like posting shit from Alex Jones' Infowars.

Then there's the authors of this paper:

Alisa Kukharkin: Colgate University. She recently graduated with a BA in Psychology and a minor in creative writing
Fiona Barber: Colgate University. Alisa's BFF and classmate who also got a BA in Psychology.
Erin Cooley: Colgate University. A prolific generator of academic dreck who appears to have been a staffer there that worked with the above two.
Nava Caluori: University of Illinois at Chicago. Another generator of academic drivel.
Xanni Brown: University of Virginia. This one is a "postdoctoral fellow" who has published a total of 9 academic papers none of which bear any significance.

There's a total of eight authors on this clusterfuck of drivel. They wrote a paper that uses all the academic buzzwords, follows conventional radical Leftist thinking and comes to self-supporting conclusions.


You should peruse the list of papers these morons have generated. Hell, AI could write better dreck.

(from the Alterrnet article)

“This line of research was motivated by recent political trends among some white Americans, including support for DEI bans, alignment with alt-right ideology, and endorsement of political violence in pursuit of political goals (e.g., January 6th),” said study authors Erin Cooley and Jazmin Brown-Iannuzzi, associate professors of psychology at Colgate University and the University of Virginia, respectively.

So, two graduate teaching assistants wrote some drivel... Note how they got a Jan 6 reference in. That's like a major touchstone now for the radical Left. It's all they've got so they run with it. Not a word about all the political violence the Left unleashes virtually daily in the US, like the Minneapolis ICE riots of late...

Well, it is Alternet after all..
 
I've been thinking about their reactions to Bad Bunny & some of the Olympic athletes, and it's kind of ironic that it was the right who started using the term "snowflake" first. Turns out, it was just projection.
I was limiting my comments to the article in the OP which, summed up, amounts to drivel written by a bunch of nobody college students and published in some obscure academic journal where nobody will ever read it was used as the basis for an article on Alternet--a conspiracy focused Leftist website--to bash MAGA / Trumpers.
 

Psypost – Bias and Credibility​

Psypost - Pro Science - Credible - Non Biased

Factual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable



PRO-SCIENCE​

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through the use of credible scientific sourcing. Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased and does not use emotional words. These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias, but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.


  • Overall, we rate PsyPost a Pro-Science based on proper sourcing of evidence-based information.

Detailed Report​

Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE (-1.8)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.1)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Founded in 2010, PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. They report their “mission is to spread information about social science and neuroscience research.”

This website lacks transparency in ownership as well as authorship of articles.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

Psypost is owned by Eric W. Dolan, who is also the founder. Revenue is derived through advertising.






Analysis / Bias

In review, PsyPost republishes or summarizes news stories related to psychology. For example, this story is sourced from Frontiers in Psychology. This story comes from Cognitive science and is credible Study uncovers some electrophysiological processes associated with the Dunning–Kruger effect.

Editorially, Psypost sticks with news and info related to psychology.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate PsyPost a Pro-Science based on proper sourcing of evidence-based information. (D. Van Zandt 1/13/2017) Updated (11/30/2024)

Source: https://www.psypost.org/
 
I was limiting my comments to the article in the OP which, summed up, amounts to drivel written by a bunch of nobody college students and published in some obscure academic journal where nobody will ever read it was used as the basis for an article on Alternet--a conspiracy focused Leftist website--to bash MAGA / Trumpers.
Oh God, after you exposed the wockwomble, she sure fixed your ass, you got a

1771785303103.png

Oh, the horror. Your life is ruined.
 
Well, let's see, it's Alternet for starters... That's like posting shit from Alex Jones' Infowars.

Then there's the authors of this paper:

Alisa Kukharkin: Colgate University. She recently graduated with a BA in Psychology and a minor in creative writing
Fiona Barber: Colgate University. Alisa's BFF and classmate who also got a BA in Psychology.
Erin Cooley: Colgate University. A prolific generator of academic dreck who appears to have been a staffer there that worked with the above two.
Nava Caluori: University of Illinois at Chicago. Another generator of academic drivel.
Xanni Brown: University of Virginia. This one is a "postdoctoral fellow" who has published a total of 9 academic papers none of which bear any significance.

There's a total of eight authors on this clusterfuck of drivel. They wrote a paper that uses all the academic buzzwords, follows conventional radical Leftist thinking and comes to self-supporting conclusions.


You should peruse the list of papers these morons have generated. Hell, AI could write better dreck.

(from the Alterrnet article)

“This line of research was motivated by recent political trends among some white Americans, including support for DEI bans, alignment with alt-right ideology, and endorsement of political violence in pursuit of political goals (e.g., January 6th),” said study authors Erin Cooley and Jazmin Brown-Iannuzzi, associate professors of psychology at Colgate University and the University of Virginia, respectively.

So, two graduate teaching assistants wrote some drivel... Note how they got a Jan 6 reference in. That's like a major touchstone now for the radical Left. It's all they've got so they run with it. Not a word about all the political violence the Left unleashes virtually daily in the US, like the Minneapolis ICE riots of late...

Well, it is Alternet after all..
Instead of picking on people no one's ever heard of - let's instead talk about the goons in trump's administration who actually have power to do stuff and how their ideas are destroying our standing in the world.

Right now anyone who supports what trump is doing is a pig.
 
I was limiting my comments to the article in the OP which, summed up, amounts to drivel written by a bunch of nobody college students and published in some obscure academic journal where nobody will ever read it was used as the basis for an article on Alternet--a conspiracy focused Leftist website--to bash MAGA / Trumpers.
Good. We're referring to what's actually happening now. Republicans are nothing but thugs who rule by scapegoating others. They can't win support any other ways because their ideas suck.
 

Psypost – Bias and Credibility​

Psypost - Pro Science - Credible - Non Biased

Factual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable



PRO-SCIENCE​

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through the use of credible scientific sourcing. Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased and does not use emotional words. These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias, but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.


  • Overall, we rate PsyPost a Pro-Science based on proper sourcing of evidence-based information.

Detailed Report​

Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE (-1.8)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.1)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Founded in 2010, PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. They report their “mission is to spread information about social science and neuroscience research.”

This website lacks transparency in ownership as well as authorship of articles.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

Psypost is owned by Eric W. Dolan, who is also the founder. Revenue is derived through advertising.






Analysis / Bias

In review, PsyPost republishes or summarizes news stories related to psychology. For example, this story is sourced from Frontiers in Psychology. This story comes from Cognitive science and is credible Study uncovers some electrophysiological processes associated with the Dunning–Kruger effect.

Editorially, Psypost sticks with news and info related to psychology.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate PsyPost a Pro-Science based on proper sourcing of evidence-based information. (D. Van Zandt 1/13/2017) Updated (11/30/2024)

Source: https://www.psypost.org/
Yea, yea.. Sure.

 
Yea, yea.. Sure.

Yea, yea.. Sure.


Alternet is rated similarly by that same source. That's what you get for single sourcing things.

Here's a different opinion on that:



View: https://www.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/lcd9xa/whats_going_on_with_people_of_rscience_calling_to/


As I demonstrated with the Stossel report, academics themselves know that much of what gets published in the academic world is nonsense and drivel. I pointed out the original article falling into that category and even quoted from the paper cited showing some of it. What you have going on is a Pygmalion effect here.

The paper's writers have a particular political bias that they share with most of their peers. This bias creeps into their work and their peers accept it. Do you really think that if you wrote a psychology paper that had a political bias in favor of Republicans, Whites, Trump, and Conservatives that short of being a world-renowned, high visibility, academic heavyweight that you'd have any chance of publication?

Here's the CV of one of the paper's authors, Nava Caluori. It's a full list of her published works.

[th]
[/th]​
[th width="64px"]
[/th]
[th width="88px"]
[/th]​
[th]
Title
Cited by
Year

Gender bias produces gender gaps in STEM engagement
CA Moss-Racusin, C Sanzari, N Caluori, H Rabasco
Sex Roles 79 (11), 651-670
275 2018

Tight Cultures and Vengeful Gods: How Culture Shapes Religious Belief
JC Jackson, N Caluori, S Abrams, E Beckman, M Gelfand, K Gray
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
103 2020

The cultural evolutionary trade-off of ritualistic synchrony
MJ Gelfand, N Caluori, JC Jackson, MK Taylor
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 375 (1805), 20190432
94 2020

Conflict changes how people view God
N Caluori, JC Jackson, K Gray, M Gelfand
Psychological Science
91 2020

The origins of religious disbelief: A dual inheritance approach
WM Gervais, MB Najle, N Caluori
Social Psychological and Personality Science 12 (7), 1369-1379
71 2021

In good company: When gender diversity boosts a company’s reputation
LS Wilton, DT Sanchez, MM Unzueta, C Kaiser, N Caluori
Psychology of Women Quarterly 43 (1), 59-72
58 2019

The new science of religious change
JC Jackson, N Caluori, K Gray, M Gelfand
American Psychologist
38 2021

From virility to virtue: the psychology of apology in honor cultures
Y Lin, N Caluori, EB Öztürk, MJ Gelfand
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119 (41), e2210324119
28 2022

Economic inequality shapes the relationship between globalization and prejudice
N Caluori, JL Brown-Iannuzzi, W Cipolli III
Social Psychological and Personality Science 12 (6), 1082-1091
24 2021

Cultural psychology of inequality: Current and future directions
S Oishi, H Bak, N Caluori
Asian Journal of Social Psychology 25 (1), 103-116
21 2022

Investigating how high perceived economic inequality exacerbates intergroup competition, zero-sum beliefs, and perceived intergroup prejudice
JA Lisnek, N Caluori, JL Brown-Iannuzzi, S Oishi
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 51 (10), 1942-1961
15 2025

White Americans who perceive themselves to be “last place” in the racial status hierarchy are most drawn to alt-right extremism
E Cooley, JL Brown-Iannuzzi, N Caluori, N Elacqua, W Cipolli
Communications psychology 2 (1), 102
7 2024

Perceptions of falling behind “most White people”: Within-group status comparisons predict fewer positive emotions and worse health over time among White (but not Black) Americans
N Caluori, E Cooley, JL Brown-Iannuzzi, E Klein, RF Lei, W Cipolli, ...
Psychological Science 35 (2), 175-190
5 2024

Culture’s Constraints: The Role of Situational Constraint in Cultural Systems
MJ Gelfand, N Caluori, S Gordon, J Raver, L Nishii, L Leslie, J Lun
The Oxford Handbook of Psychological Situations
5 2018

Cascading influences of caregiver experiences of discrimination and adolescent antisocial behavior
SM Savell, M Niguse, N Caluori, JL Brown-Iannuzzi, MN Wilson, ...
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology 54 (6), 657-671
2 2025

White Americans’ feelings of being “last place” are associated with anti-DEI attitudes, Trump support, and Trump vote during the 2024 US presidential election
A Kukharkin, F Barber, E Cooley, N Caluori, X Brown, A Singh, W Cipolli, ...
advances. in/psychology 1, e549398
2026

Economic inequality, racial stereotypes, and attitudes toward policies aimed at mitigating inequality
JL Brown-Iannuzzi, E Cooley, E Attick, R Bissainthe, N Caluori
Handbook of Experimental Social Psychology, 296-315
2025

Perceptions of Other Nations Produce Selective Cultural Transmission
N Caluori, J Brown-Iannuzzi
OSF
2025

New Directions for Research on Forgiveness in Organizations: Barriers and Boundary Conditions
B Bradley, D Brady, N Caluori, J Evans, M Gelfand, A Hillebrandt, ...
Academy of Management Proceedings 2022 (1), 12734
[/th]​
[th width="64px"]
[/th]
[th width="88px"]
[/th]​

The ones in yellow have nothing to do with her academic background. Here's her official U. of Chicago page:


The paper is crap. Alternet published an article full of crap based on a shit academic paper written by a bunch of idiot college students.
 
Hey, tell Numbskull Six to do just that. Feel free to do so yourself.
Aw I'm sorry a little girl is being mean to her. Hopefully Noem and Lewandowskis goons will terrorize more Democrats this week!

Huge loss for trump with those tariffs being yanked.

I'm really looking forward to that Blue Wave, aren't you?
 
This is how MAGAs work. They write papers with a particular political bias that they share with most of their peers. This bias creeps into their work and their peers accept it.
 
Back
Top