A Breitbart/Sherrod timeline

RStringfield said:
Nonsense. They laugh at her comment... [What he didn't know was I was trying to decide just how much help I was going to give him.]

They did not laugh or applaud any discriminatory ACTION. They understood her thoughts and feelings. A person wouldn't laugh at that unless they understood the folly of it.

They do show approval at her redemption as you can see heads nodding and hear "uhh-huhhhs" as she describes her realization that her job was to help the poor.
Click to expand...
Wrong. They were silent on her redemption and approved of her racism.
 
RStringfield said:
How are the right wingers going to spin her now? First she was a racist, but once they lost on that they had to spin her as a victim to make it look like it was all Obama's fault. Now that the victim is blaming her true attacker, Breitbart, the right wing can't leave her as a victim. They will either have to claim she is a pawn, just hope everyone forgets about her, or allow Breitbart to take the fall.

It's like watching the Keystone Cops, watching these idiots stumble over themselves.
Click to expand...
Dude... She sent that video to her superiors more than a week before it appeared on Breitbart's site. They have no excuse being so deliberately ignorant as to the full content of the video. Pretending that the knee-jerk reaction to what was obviously a cut of a larger speech from the Administration should be ignored because she doesn't like Breitbart is an attempt to distract. I don't care what happens to Breitbart, I do care that this Administration is so inept on race issues that they didn't even slow down to find out what even Glenn Beck saw on the first day it became news.

When even some strange guy on the interweb's political website called JPP by its users can tell you that we need more information, there is no excuse for this type of inane over reaction from the Administration, flatly no excuse. This stumbling demented childlike Administration continues to over-react when caution is "shouted" out by the circumstances and continues to falter in committees when circumstances demand action.
 
NigelTufnel said:
You jackasses are still talking about this? Jesus. Give it a rest.
Click to expand...
Translation:

I didn't think I'd have to defend this Administration's stupid and knee-jerk reaction to this any longer, and I wish I didn't have to. I'll try to "mock" people into silence because there really is no defense.
 
Damocles said:
Translation:

I didn't think I'd have to defend this Administration's stupid and knee-jerk reaction to this any longer, and I wish I didn't have to. I'll try to "mock" people into silence because there really is no defense.
Click to expand...


Can you point me to me defending the administration at all on this issue? As I said previously and I'll say again for the nth time, the administration fucked up.

I was gone for about a week and just got back yesterday and I'm surprised you jackasses are still talking about this. Carry on.
 
NigelTufnel said:
Can you point me to me defending the administration at all on this issue? As I said previously and I'll say again for the nth time, the administration fucked up.

I was gone for about a week and just got back yesterday and I'm surprised you jackasses are still talking about this. Carry on.
Click to expand...
Well, welcome back then. It costs nothing to continue talking about something that is also still in the news. The threat of "lawsuit" was clearly an attempt to try to keep it there. I can't see why we'd not be talking about this one, but would about the all important issue of when "being human" starts...
 
Damocles said:
Translation:

I didn't think I'd have to defend this Administration's stupid and knee-jerk reaction to this any longer, and I wish I didn't have to. I'll try to "mock" people into silence because there really is no defense.
Click to expand...

Kind of like defending "gaggle of dogs" for a retarded libertarian friend?


(it's funny because it's absurd and wrong)
 
AssHatZombie said:
Kind of like defending "gaggle of dogs" for a retarded libertarian friend?


(it's funny because it's absurd and wrong)
Click to expand...
Not really. I just like saying silly things that still get my point across. It takes a gaggle of dingos to really sort it all out, but I wasn't really defending Strings...

I just like saying stuff like "Murder of Sheep"...
 
Damocles said:
Not really. I just like saying silly things that still get my point across. It takes a gaggle of dingos to really sort it all out, but I wasn't really defending Strings...

I just like saying stuff like "Murder of Sheep"...
Click to expand...

Silly because they're wrong. right. still silly. still wrong. silly due to being wrong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top