Don Lemon

I guess reporting at a plane crash site is a ongoing disruption. :dunno:
Could be if you were in the middle of a rescue impending first responders. If you had an injured family member still in the plane would you think a reporter sticking a microphone in their face was an interruption?
 
No he was being interrupted by Lemon stand up in the middle of church talking and interviewing people and not leaving. Sorry you lose and everyone including you knows it. Well not really sorry but you know what I mean. :laugh:
Was he prevented from getting to the podium and preach?
 
Yep he stood outside the Church and told his audience the purpose was to make the congregation "uncomfortable." One lady was so scared that when she ran out of the Church she slipped and injured her arm. Children were crying. Parents were blocked from reaching there kids down stairs. Prisoners were screamed at and call Nazis.

You are doing what @Damocles did earlier that i showed was bunk and dumb.

There is nothing wrong, with a reporter stating 'the purpose these protestors are going in with is to make people "uncomfortable".

Reporters can know the PURPOSE or INTENT of the No Kings or any other protest and still show up to report on it and that is not a crime and does attach them to any crime.

So since both you and Damo continue to repeat things that are not crimes, as if crimes, i am fully inclined to believe now what you say is complete BS, because when people have facts and truth they use it and not the BS you guys seem desperate to distort into crimes, when they are not.
 
So reporters have the right to invade abortion clinic and interview patients? "Lady why do you want to kill your baby like Nazis killed baby Jews."

:oprah:

If the abortion clinic is OPEN TO THE PUBLIC in the same way a church is, then yes.

If the abortion clinic has restrictions, then no.


Once again you are trying to distort away from the truth proving more and more you know facts and truth do not serve you.

IT IS UNDENYABLE FACT A CHURCH OPEN FOR SERVICE THAT POSTS NO EXCLUSIONS TO ENTRY IS OPEN TO ANYONE AND EVERYONE WHO WANTS TO ENTER, INCLUDING A JOURNALIST.

That you idiots do not know this and keep arguing against it, exposes how deeply stupid you are. You cannot find a winning point to argue and so you keep trying to distort this in to one and it is NOT.
 
You are doing what @Damocles did earlier that i showed was bunk and dumb.

There is nothing wrong, with a reporter stating 'the purpose these protestors are going in with is to make people "uncomfortable".

Reporters can know the PURPOSE or INTENT of the No Kings or any other protest and still show up to report on it and that is not a crime and does attach them to any crime.

So since both you and Damo continue to repeat things that are not crimes, as if crimes, i am fully inclined to believe now what you say is complete BS, because when people have facts and truth they use it and not the BS you guys seem desperate to distort into crimes, when they are not.
Yep when Lemon said the purpose was to make them uncomfortable he he was standing outside and that speech is protected IMHO but it well explain why Lemon went inside the church and interrupted the services which is a clear violation of the FACE Act. and is a denial of Christians civil rights to worship.
 
So the answer is no. The pastor was free to go to the podium and continue the preaching.
So the answer is yes. If the members can't hear you there is no point to preaching. That is like someone standing in front of the sign interpreter for you. The preacher can preach but if you can't see what he said he can't preach to you.
 
If the abortion clinic is OPEN TO THE PUBLIC in the same way a church is, then yes.

If the abortion clinic has restrictions, then no.


Once again you are trying to distort away from the truth proving more and more you know facts and truth do not serve you.

IT IS UNDENYABLE FACT A CHURCH OPEN FOR SERVICE THAT POSTS NO EXCLUSIONS TO ENTRY IS OPEN TO ANYONE AND EVERYONE WHO WANTS TO ENTER, INCLUDING A JOURNALIST.

That you idiots do not know this and keep arguing against it, exposes how deeply stupid you are. You cannot find a winning point to argue and so you keep trying to distort this in to one and it is NOT.
Inversion fallacy.

Interrupting a church service and intimidating church attendees is a CRIME.
 
Back
Top