How do you know when your love of Donald Trump has turned into servile worship?

evince said:
Now what Dutch

Remember how pissed the right was for Clinton fighting the evil
Click to expand...
They were pissed that Clinton was president and tried to impeach him. Yes, they put politics over national security by accusing Clinton of "wagging the dog". That's on them. Clinton putting himself in that position along with falling for it is on both him and the Democrats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TOP
Margot said:
So they get to execute him for that?
Click to expand...
Whether they "get to" or not is irrelevant, they did. You have to be an idiot to think interfering with a federal agent in the execution of their lawful duties is a smart thing to do. The fact is he was part of an organized group that exist solely for the purpose of disrupting ICE. If an agent feels like their lives are in danger they can defend themselves and it's not on you to decide when they should feel like they are at risk.
 
Yakuda said:
Whether they "get to" or not is irrelevant, they did. You have to be an idiot to think interfering with a federal agent in the execution of their lawful duties is a smart thing to do. The fact is he was part of an organized group that exist solely for the purpose of disrupting ICE. If an agent feels like their lives are in danger they can defend themselves and it's not on you to decide when they should feel like they are at risk.
Click to expand...
ICE are hired thugs!
 
evince said:
Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000), was a landmark decisionof the United States Supreme Court on December 12, 2000, that settled a recount dispute in Florida's 2000 presidential election between George W. Bush and Al Gore. On December 8, the Florida Supreme Court had ordered a statewide recount of all undervotes, over 61,000 ballots that the vote tabulation machines had missed. The Bush campaign immediately asked the U.S. Supreme Court to stay the decision and halt the recount. Justice Antonin Scalia, contending that all the manual recounts being performed in Florida's counties were illegitimate, urged his colleagues to grant the stay immediately.December 9, the five conservative justices on the Court granted the stay, with Scalia citing "irreparable harm" that could befall Bush, as the recounts would cast "a needless and unjustified cloud" over Bush's legitimacy. In dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote that "counting every legally cast vote cannot constitute irreparable harm."Oral arguments were scheduled for December 11.
Click to expand...
And lost 169
 
evince said:
en.wikipedia.org

John P. O'Neill - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org



He subsequently learned of al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden, and investigated the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia and the 2000 USS Colebombing in Yemen. Partly due to personal friction he had within the FBI and federal government, O'Neill left the Bureau in August 2001.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_P._O'Neill#cite_note-pbs-1"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></a> He became the head of security at the World Trade Center, where he died at age 49 while helping others to evacuate the South Tower during the September 11 attacks. O'Neill's life has been featured in a number of documentaries and books.
Click to expand...
And post 144
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Sorry, but I don't buy the argument that our elections are corrupted through voting machines or other means.

Yes, for decades now, the Republicans have sought to sway elections through various means, but the elections themselves remain free and fair.
Click to expand...
Then you will learn in time

It will all be investigated
 
LurchAddams said:
I actually brought that up with an old HS buddy - I think I told you. She's not happy.
Click to expand...
Yeah, their support for the fat murderboy's right to kill in alleged "self defense" kind of took the wind out of the MAGATs' Pretti-deserved-to-be-executed sails, didn't it? Only the stupidest, most virulent of our fascist trolls here are still pretending the ICE thugs did nothing wrong.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
An expectation in the land of rainbows and unicorns. In the real world, where I lived in those days, there were still a lot of threats to the Free World as time quickly proved.

The Democratic policies of the 1990s were isolationist in both nature and results, even if not in name. I'm not saying the US shouldn't have cut back our military in certain areas post-USSR, but the Democrats did to the US military and intelligence agencies what DOGE did to USAid and the Federal government.

As we are experiencing with Trump, it's a lot easier to burn bridges than to build them. The Democrats had a slash and burn strategy for cutting the military into a beach defense force and converted the intelligence agencies into a satellite monitoring service.

I retired from the military in 1998 and watched it all go down. 8 years earlier I'd earned my MS in International Relations and recognized all the threats of the time....and I was an average assessor of the coming problems. 9/11 wasn't a surprise because of the attack. Most officers I knew expected a major attack on US soil within a few years. The surprise was the audaciousness of the attack. As the 9/11 report stated, it was a failure of imagination....and the Democratic Party shares just as much responsibility for it as GW Bush and his Oil assholes.
Click to expand...
the democrats didn't used to be globalist neocon fucksticks too.

is that what you're trying to say?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top