"You cant walk in with Guns"

Yep. Assaulting Leos while armed. It'll getcha dead most of the time.
They don't have to put up with that shit.
And I STFU right after that, because you goobers don't need to know what I do.
I'll tell you this: If you leftist goobers keep playing with fire, you are going to get burned.
And not just like a finger or 2.
3rd degree portions of your body burned. Bad.
He didn’t assault a LEO, if anything they assaulted him, watch the video. He did step between them and a woman they had pushed to the ground.
 
No it’s not and no He didn’t, he put his hand up to avoid the spray. That’s it. He never laid a hand on the officers.

You are lost!
Yes it is Jarod . Am I going to have to bill you for your education?


AI Overview
Yes, putting your hands on, assaulting, resisting, or impeding a federal officer while they are engaged in official duties is a federal crime under
18 U.S.C. § 111. Penalties range from fines and up to 3 years in prison for simple assault, to 10–20 years for using a weapon or causing serious injury.

Clearly he put his hands on officers and resisted being arrested.

You lose :laugh:
 
Yes it is Jarod . Am I going to have to bill you for your education?


AI Overview
Yes, putting your hands on, assaulting, resisting, or impeding a federal officer while they are engaged in official duties is a federal crime under
18 U.S.C. § 111
. Penalties range from fines and up to 3 years in prison for simple assault, to 10–20 years for using a weapon or causing serious injury.

Clearly he put his hands on officers and resisted being arrested.

You lose :laugh:
That’s different than just “ pitting a hand in a fed”, dumbshit!
 
P
Yes it is Jarod . Am I going to have to bill you for your education?


AI Overview
Yes, putting your hands on, assaulting, resisting, or impeding a federal officer while they are engaged in official duties is a federal crime under
18 U.S.C. § 111
. Penalties range from fines and up to 3 years in prison for simple assault, to 10–20 years for using a weapon or causing serious injury.

Clearly he put his hands on officers and resisted being arrested.

You lose :laugh:
retti didn’t put a hand on anyone !
 
Rittenhouse's was debatable due to his age. Pretti was carrying LEGALLY.

Would some technicality on that point make murdering Pretti any more legal or okay? NO!
Wasn't even debatable. It was a straight up straw purchase. Someone bought iy for him because he couldn't legally buy it himself.

That's how many many criminals get their guns.
 
Can you stand with the guns, DonOld? We need clarity on what we can do with the guns?
The trump cult over the past few weeks have made it pretty clear - the right to assemble and the right to carry a permitted weapon are inalienable rights - AS LONG AS YOU DIDN'T VOTE DEMOCRAT.

It's funny they don't even realize how they're flip-flopping on one of their biggest wedge issues. Poor trumptards.
 
Back
Top