You cannot bring a gun….The PP administration on gun rights!

Probably best and wait for someone with actual knowledge of the law to chime in here.
The receprionists continued trolling is boring.
 
So you support what Trumps SS are doing in Minnesota but attack what happened on 1/6? Pittafull.
The Secret Service is not in Minnesota

You support the murder of an unarmed 5'2" woman that was not fighting the police but you attack agents for defending themselves from a man with a loaded gun and LOTS of extra ammo fighting with the police being killed. Pitiful
 
They

The hypocrisy is monumental.
Never been a more fitting quote for you,

1769445035930.png
There is no talking to idiots. Cant be done because they have no interest whatsoever in the actual TRUTH of the matter. Did I say it was against the law carry a legally obtained hand gun to a protest? No,...I did not. What I did say was that it was stupid, and needless. Now a man is dead because of it. YAYYYYYYYYYYY!!!! You won!!! You have the right to be STUPID! :rolleyes:
For some reason, the receptionist gets a lot of coffee breaks, which allows him to post nonsense, which in turn, further feeds his narcissism.
The life cycle of a leftie.
 
So you are good with the government killing you for bringing a handgun to a protest?
If you don't interfere or harass in the protest , they won't even know that you have a gun.... Even if it's really expensive, Possibly defective one and you have a bunch of extra ammunition....
 
IMO bringing a gun to a SO CALLED peaceful protest makes you an IDIOT.

There is this little thing called COMMON SENSE involved.

What would the need be to bring a gun to a protest where YOU yourself are one of the protesters? Are you afraid of your own fellow protesters and think your fellow travelers are going to attack you? That makes no sense does it. OR do you think you are going to use the gun against Federal Agents? That would even be MORE INSANE then the first scenario because if you attempt to use it against Federal agents you absolutely will meet your death shortly thereafter. So,...again,....that makes no sense either.

There is no talking to idiots. Cant be done because they have no interest whatsoever in the actual TRUTH of the matter. Did I say it was against the law carry a legally obtained hand gun to a protest? No,...I did not. What I did say was that it was stupid, and needless. Now a man is dead because of it. YAYYYYYYYYYYY!!!! You won!!! You have the right to be STUPID! :rolleyes:

In America we have 2nd amendment rights,....Im all for it. However,...I am not for stupidity or for people who only seek to inflame already bad situations. WHY am I against that? Because its FUCKING stupid. I mean,....go right on ahead with your bad selves and insert guns into an already bad situation....see how that ends for you dummies.

Even though I am all for 2nd amendment rights do you actually think I just walk around with a gun in my normal every day life? Like EVER? I dont. That's crazy IMO.

dumb-and-dumber-dance.gif

Dance Jethro, dance.
 
IMO bringing a gun to a SO CALLED peaceful protest makes you an IDIOT.
so you believe that any "peaceful protest" will never see 'bad guys with a gun' show up ... and that no 'good guy with a gun' should ever bring their guns, just in case, to protect themselves, ...and if they do they are IDIOTS and bring their death on to themselves?
 
If you don't interfere or harass in the protest , they won't even know that you have a gun.... Even if it's really expensive, Possibly defective one and you have a bunch of extra ammunition....
ok, those killed at the Boston Massacre were throwing rocks.
 
You cannot bring a firearm to any protest you want. - Cash Patel, yesterday.

Offering reasons they killed Alex Pretti.
No matter how much you lie and flail, your argument is moronic, unhinged and lacks any legal foundation.

Only uneducated, brain-dead leftist idiots are arguing that this guy had the right to interfere and obstruct Federal officers during a law enforcement operation while armed.

Country's top expert in the law of self-defense weighs in. The firearm matters—and the media is hiding it. At the Minneapolis Border Patrol shooting, the suspect was armed with a SIG Sauer P320 AXG Combat, a high-capacity 9mm pistol with a threaded barrel, extended 20–21 round magazine, and a SIG Romeo optic—a setup costing $1,500–$2,000. This was not a cheap carry gun.

Officers were in a physical struggle with an armed suspect when a gun was perceived and the word “gun” was shouted. Under settled self-defense law, officers are entitled to rely on fellow officers’ reasonable perceptions. They do not have to personally confirm the threat.

Once a firearm appears during active resistance, the legal standard is simple
: reasonable perception of imminent deadly force. That standard was met here. Freeze-frame activism doesn’t override real-time dynamics, and the law does not require officers to wait to be shot. This was a tragic—but lawful—use of force.
 
Yeah. Gun rights groups are turning into the trump administration over that.

No they aren't shit-for-brains. More stupid word salad. :palm:

The purpose of the 2A is literally "to prevent government tyranny".

Wrong. The purpose is because citizens have a right to protect themselves and their property you brainless dumbass. :palm:

And boy is there a lot of tyranny goin' on right now with trump and his army of masked thugs.

Dumbest lie you brainless halfwits parrot. Its the MOB running amok trying top prevent the deportation of criminal aliens that are the tyrants. They will either find themselves in jail, or in extreme cases, dead.
 
Is it against the law? Trumps people think so!
Yes, it is. Of course, what would you know about that being a brainless, uneducated leftist hack who parrots the bullshit you are spoon fed by the DNC?

The minute the dumbass with the loaded weapon interfered and obstructed Federal law enforcement, he was not merely breaking the law, but then became an armed threat.
 
Back
Top