More neocon lies exposed

Taichiliberal said:
See folks, willfully ignorant, cowardly little bigots like Southy DO NOT READ THE INFORMATION PROVIDED when it challenges their viewpoints and beliefs. Had he done so, he would have read that Breibart's edits are NOT applause as he claims, but applause at a DIFFERENT time in the speech, when Sherrod is acknowleding her growth and correction of her own former prejudices.

But like I said, Southy is just a cowardly little bigot...a neocon parrot of no intellectual substance. Which is why he won't discuss content, but attempts to ridicule the source by name alone.

Facts and logic were Breibart's undoing, and dope's like Southy's constant frustration.
Click to expand...

Actually Libby, here is the full video:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9NcCa_KjXk"]YouTube- Shirley Sherrod: the FULL video[/ame]

The story in question begins at time 17:00, and the approval of her racism comes about 30 seconds later.

This is exactly the same in Breitbart's video:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAWsZJkaFaU&feature=related"]YouTube- Shirley Sherrod Shows Her True Colors[/ame]

Breitbart didn't manipulate the video, he simply isolated this one story to shorten it.

So again, Libby, why did the NAACP crowd react with approval?
 
Breitbart's explanation here:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bo7Q3l19M_0"]YouTube- Breitbart Stands Behind Sherrod Video[/ame]

Breitbart's video wasn't edited to show Sherrod in a bad light, but the MSM's was!
 
Southern Man said:
Actually Libby, here is the full video:

YouTube- Shirley Sherrod: the FULL video

The story in question begins at time 17:00, and the approval of her racism comes about 30 seconds later.

This is exactly the same in Breitbart's video:

YouTube- Shirley Sherrod Shows Her True Colors

Breitbart didn't manipulate the video, he simply isolated this one story to shorten it.

So again, Libby, why did the NAACP crowd react with approval?
Click to expand...


All you're doing is just repeating Breibarts folly.......the entire video does NOT show applause at one particular moment, and the edited version leaves out what transpired BEFORE and AFTER. It's called context, you Southern Man Fool. If you don't understand what proper context is, then toddle down to a high school and get the English teacher to give you a refresher course in composition and reading. The people were NOT applauding her "racism"....and all one has to do is watch the ENTIRE video to see that.

But neocon parrots don't have the patience, and ignore EXACTLY what's in front of them if it contradicts their beliefs and views.

For those of you who wants to see the truth of the situation. Start at time mark 16:00 and continue to 21:30 on the full 43:14 minute video....then you'll understand what Sherrod's story was all about in it's proper context....it's about her acknowleding and coming to grips with her own prejudices, realizing she was wrong and subsequently RIGHTING A WRONG for the very people that Breibart and the neocon parrots swear she's against!. I note that neither Breibart or Southy acknowledge the appreciative sounds from the audience when Sherrod does this.

Breibart did a hatchet job (hell, the little dummy didn't even do his homework...the edited clip was sent to him), and willfully ignorant neocon parrots and bigots (take your pick as to which one Southy is) will ignore the FACTS and just keep repeating the lies.

But the truth will always be the undoing of neocon parrots and bigots.
 
Last edited:
bravo said:
Its fuckin' hilarious that you rant about breitbart when the Obama ADMINISTRATION ACTUALLY FIRED THE BITCH for the same issue....

Breitbart is a freakin' internet blog....

OBAMA IS THE PRESIDENT OF THE US......


Jesus H. Christ....dont' you have any sense of balance.....a dumpy blogger compared to the POTUS ????
Click to expand...

Folks, you notice how Bravo does the printed equivalent of screaming louder as the intelligence level of his posts drops below sea level? :palm:

Okay, my mentally handicapped Bravo, let me school you on what's happening:

1) No one is comparing Breibart to the President....the ONLY idiot who has done such so far is YOU!

2) Breibart is a frequent commentator for the Washington Times, and contributed to the Wall Street Journal and National Review. That makes his a working journalist/writer. That means that Breibart's blogs carries a little more weight in the MSM than one started by you or me. Given that this particular blog was picked up and run by the MSM (with heavy bullhorning from the neocon media a'la NewsMax, Fox, WND, etc.) as if it were truth. Further examination found out it was an out-of-context hatchet job...which makes Breibart a LIAR with NO credibility.

3) The hysterical and panicky reaction from Vilsack has resulted in embarassment and a public apology from him as well as the President. Whether she will take the job back is not known. Whether she'll sue Breibart for slander is up for question.

My openings posts stands as legit....and jackasses like Bravo just bray nonsense in frustration.
 
Southern Man said:
Breitbart's explanation here:

YouTube- Breitbart Stands Behind Sherrod Video

Breibart's video wasn't edited to show Sherrod in a bad light, but the MSM's was!
Click to expand...

Breibart is not only a hack and a liar, but a Bad one at that! Here's the chronology of Breibart's BS:



http://mediamatters.org/research/201007220004


And as I displayed in the opening post, Breibart's accusations against NAACP was YET ANOTHER display of out-of-context misrepresentation on his part.

Bottom line: if Breibart was so sure that the video he got was NOTHING about Sherrod being racist, then WHY RUN IT? He's not making sense....but sense is not his goal, as your clip shows Southy. Breibart just tried to gloss over his getting nailed as complicit in slander by ranting on about the NAACP, the teabaggers, accusing Congressmen about lying about being spit on, etc. He makes a LOT of claims, but all one has to do is examine his actions and when/how he did them to see how full of it he is! Breibart's "logic" is that the NAACP is racist, so let's run a hatchet job to try and slander the NAACP and it's guest speaker to highlight that fact. Breibart wants us to excuse his LIES in order to accept his assertions.

Problem is, he's been factually proven wrong on both counts. And all his convoluted bullshit won't change that.
 
Last edited:
Taichiliberal said:
All you're doing is just repeating Breibarts folly.......the entire video does NOT show applause at one particular moment, and the edited version leaves out what transpired BEFORE and AFTER. It's called context, you Southern Man Fool. If you don't understand what proper context is, then toddle down to a high school and get the English teacher to give you a refresher course in composition and reading. The people were NOT applauding her "racism"....and all one has to do is watch the ENTIRE video to see that.

But neocon parrots don't have the patience, and ignore EXACTLY what's in front of them if it contradicts their beliefs and views.

For those of you who wants to see the truth of the situation. Start at time mark 16:00 and continue to 21:30 on the full 43:14 minute video....then you'll understand what Sherrod's story was all about in it's proper context....it's about her acknowleding and coming to grips with her own prejudices, realizing she was wrong and subsequently RIGHTING A WRONG for the very people that Breibart and the neocon parrots swear she's against!. I note that neither Breibart or Southy acknowledge the appreciative sounds from the audience when Sherrod does this.

Breibart did a hatchet job (hell, the little dummy didn't even do his homework...the edited clip was sent to him), and willfully ignorant neocon parrots and bigots (take your pick as to which one Southy is) will ignore the FACTS and just keep repeating the lies.

But the truth will always be the undoing of neocon parrots and bigots.
Click to expand...
I didn't say "applause" Libby; I said "approval". Why do the folks in the audience seem to approve of racism?
 
Taichiliberal said:
Breibart is not only a hack and a liar, but a Bad one at that! Here's the chronology of Breibart's BS:



http://mediamatters.org/research/201007220004


And as I displayed in the opening post, Breibart's accusations against NAACP was YET ANOTHER display of out-of-context misrepresentation on his part.

Bottom line: if Breibart was so sure that the video he got was NOTHING about Sherrod being racist, then WHY RUN IT? He's not making sense....but sense is not his goal, as your clip shows Southy. Breibart just tried to gloss over his getting nailed as complicit in slander by ranting on about the NAACP, the teabaggers, accusing Congressmen about lying about being spit on, etc. He makes a LOT of claims, but all one has to do is examine his actions and when/how he did them to see how full of it he is! Breibart's "logic" is that the NAACP is racist, so let's run a hatchet job to try and slander the NAACP and it's guest speaker to highlight that fact. Breibart wants us to excuse his LIES in order to accept his assertions.

Problem is, he's been factually proven wrong on both counts. And all his convoluted bullshit won't change that.
Click to expand...

Wow Media Matters again.

Why did the NAACP folks seem to approve of her racism?
 
Taichiliberal said:
Folks, you notice how Bravo does the printed equivalent of screaming louder as the intelligence level of his posts drops below sea level? :palm:

Okay, my mentally handicapped Bravo, let me school you on what's happening:

1) No one is comparing Breibart to the President....the ONLY idiot who has done such so far is YOU!

2) Breibart is a frequent commentator for the Washington Times, and contributed to the Wall Street Journal and National Review. That makes his a working journalist/writer. That means that Breibart's blogs carries a little more weight in the MSM than one started by you or me. Given that this particular blog was picked up and run by the MSM (with heavy bullhorning from the neocon media a'la NewsMax, Fox, WND, etc.) as if it were truth. Further examination found out it was an out-of-context hatchet job...which makes Breibart a LIAR with NO credibility.

3) The hysterical and panicky reaction from Vilsack has resulted in embarassment and a public apology from him as well as the President. Whether she will take the job back is not known. Whether she'll sue Breibart for slander is up for question.

My openings posts stands as legit....and jackasses like Bravo just bray nonsense in frustration.
Click to expand...

Breibart didn't do his homework? what crap....

Bbart didn't fire this racist from her government job either....

But some asshole DID FIRE her from her job over this....THEY didn't do THEIR homework....who was that? MR. DIDN'T DO THEIR HOMEWORK OBAMA....THATS WHO....you pompous peckerhead....

Your messiah fucked up big time and all the spin and shifting blame to FOX, Bill O'Reilly, and right wing internet sites ain't gonna change that fact....

In this case, Bbart and Obama are like two peas in a pod.....
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Breibart is not only a hack and a liar, but a Bad one at that! Here's the chronology of Breibart's BS:



http://mediamatters.org/research/201007220004


And as I displayed in the opening post, Breibart's accusations against NAACP was YET ANOTHER display of out-of-context misrepresentation on his part.

Bottom line: if Breibart was so sure that the video he got was NOTHING about Sherrod being racist, then WHY RUN IT? He's not making sense....but sense is not his goal, as your clip shows Southy. Breibart just tried to gloss over his getting nailed as complicit in slander by ranting on about the NAACP, the teabaggers, accusing Congressmen about lying about being spit on, etc. He makes a LOT of claims, but all one has to do is examine his actions and when/how he did them to see how full of it he is! Breibart's "logic" is that the NAACP is racist, so let's run a hatchet job to try and slander the NAACP and it's guest speaker to highlight that fact. Breibart wants us to excuse his LIES in order to accept his assertions.

Problem is, he's been factually proven wrong on both counts. And all his convoluted bullshit won't change that.
Click to expand...

Southern Man said:
Wow Media Matters again.

Why did the NAACP folks seem to approve of her racism?
Click to expand...

Wow, Southy's can't disprove what they say, so he throws rocks...Southy the frustrated fool strikes again.

And when Southy gets his ass kicked, he just pretends nothing happened and squawks like the willfully ignorant neocon parrot that his. Pity the chronology of the post will always be his undoing.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
All you're doing is just repeating Breibarts folly.......the entire video does NOT show applause at one particular moment, and the edited version leaves out what transpired BEFORE and AFTER. It's called context, you Southern Man Fool. If you don't understand what proper context is, then toddle down to a high school and get the English teacher to give you a refresher course in composition and reading. The people were NOT applauding her "racism"....and all one has to do is watch the ENTIRE video to see that.

But neocon parrots don't have the patience, and ignore EXACTLY what's in front of them if it contradicts their beliefs and views.

For those of you who wants to see the truth of the situation. Start at time mark 16:00 and continue to 21:30 on the full 43:14 minute video....then you'll understand what Sherrod's story was all about in it's proper context....it's about her acknowleding and coming to grips with her own prejudices, realizing she was wrong and subsequently RIGHTING A WRONG for the very people that Breibart and the neocon parrots swear she's against!. I note that neither Breibart or Southy acknowledge the appreciative sounds from the audience when Sherrod does this.

Breibart did a hatchet job (hell, the little dummy didn't even do his homework...the edited clip was sent to him), and willfully ignorant neocon parrots and bigots (take your pick as to which one Southy is) will ignore the FACTS and just keep repeating the lies.

But the truth will always be the undoing of neocon parrots and bigots.
Click to expand...

Southern Man said:
I didn't say "applause" Libby; I said "approval". Why do the folks in the audience seem to approve of racism?
Click to expand...

It only "seems" that way to willfully ignorant neocon parrots like you who STILL hold onto the Breibart hatchet job while ignoring the evidence of the full video in full context...as I previously explained above.

I stand corrected regarding "applause" and "approval".....and once again prove you wrong on everything else. The audience did not approve of her racism, since they were aware of where she was going with the story.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Breibart was caught in promoting slander...and all his bullshit won't change that.
And to get you up to speed, Obama's a centrist Democrat (not a blue dog democrat).
Click to expand...

Threedee said:
Centerist Dems spend like wingnuts.
Click to expand...

That is your opinion, and you are welcome to it.

Breibart is a lying SOS and was caught flat footed. That is a matter of fact and history that only a stubborn fool would deny.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Folks, you notice how Bravo does the printed equivalent of screaming louder as the intelligence level of his posts drops below sea level?

Okay, my mentally handicapped Bravo, let me school you on what's happening:

1) No one is comparing Breibart to the President....the ONLY idiot who has done such so far is YOU!

2) Breibart is a frequent commentator for the Washington Times, and contributed to the Wall Street Journal and National Review. That makes his a working journalist/writer. That means that Breibart's blogs carries a little more weight in the MSM than one started by you or me. Given that this particular blog was picked up and run by the MSM (with heavy bullhorning from the neocon media a'la NewsMax, Fox, WND, etc.) as if it were truth. Further examination found out it was an out-of-context hatchet job...which makes Breibart a LIAR with NO credibility.

3) The hysterical and panicky reaction from Vilsack has resulted in embarassment and a public apology from him as well as the President. Whether she will take the job back is not known. Whether she'll sue Breibart for slander is up for question.

My openings posts stands as legit....and jackasses like Bravo just bray nonsense in frustration.
Click to expand...

bravo said:
Breibart didn't do his homework? what crap....

What "crap" are YOU raving about, toodles? Breibart ADMITTED that he received the edited video and ran it BEFORE HE RAN THE FULL, UNEDITED VERSION SANS NEOCON COMMENTARY. A matter of fact and history that your tiny little mind just can't handle.

Bbart didn't fire this racist from her government job either....

Pay attention, toodles....IT'S BEEN PROVEN VIA THE FULL UNEDITED VERSION OF THE VIDEO SANS NEOCON COMMENTARY THAT THE WOMAN IS NO BIGOT. That her superior panicked after get splashed by the neocon kool-aid just makes TWO errors the woman suffered by.

But some asshole DID FIRE her from her job over this....THEY didn't do THEIR homework....who was that? MR. DIDN'T DO THEIR HOMEWORK OBAMA....THATS WHO....you pompous peckerhead....

:palm: All one has to do is follow the chronology of the posts that shows I acknowledge the screw up of Vislack. Our dimwitted Bravo thinks Vislacks error excuses the lies foistered by Breibart, which is the starting point for all this. Nowhere do I excuse Vislack, but it seems outing Breibart for the neocon hack and liar that he is just sets off our neocon lackey Bravo. TFB for Bravo.

Your messiah fucked up big time and all the spin and shifting blame to FOX, Bill O'Reilly, and right wing internet sites ain't gonna change that fact....

:palm: Note how Bravo immediately falls back on the racist tinged neocon BS that permeated the 2008 campaign and became a bitter mantra for defeated GOPers. And since NOWHERE do I excuse Vislack or Obama, and in fact acknowledge their mea culpa, Bravo's slavering rant is all the more absurd.

In this case, Bbart and Obama are like two peas in a pod.....
Click to expand...

:palm: Hey Bravo...did Obama create an hatchet job video and blast it to the media to slander someone?

Nope.

Did Obama PERSONALLY FIRE SHERROD?

Nope, that was Vislack, her superior. He apologized and admitted he jumped the gun. Obama took responsibility to apologize for what happened under his administration.

Breibart is maintaining he did no wrong....which would mean he's a totally clueless hack that just follows the lead of anything put in front of him....and he won't cop to that either.

So, my intellectually stunted Bravo, you can increase the size and bold of the typeface until doomsday....but you can't escape the matter of fact and history that shows how full of it Breibart is.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Wow, Southy's can't disprove what they say, so he throws rocks...Southy the frustrated fool strikes again.

And when Southy gets his ass kicked, he just pretends nothing happened and squawks like the willfully ignorant neocon parrot that his. Pity the chronology of the post will always be his undoing.
Click to expand...
"Throws rocks"? Its a question: Why did the NAACP folks seem to approve of her racism?
 
Taichiliberal said:
It only "seems" that way to willfully ignorant neocon parrots like you who STILL hold onto the Breibart hatchet job while ignoring the evidence of the full video in full context...as I previously explained above.

I stand corrected regarding "applause" and "approval".....and once again prove you wrong on everything else. The audience did not approve of her racism, since they were aware of where she was going with the story.
Click to expand...

Breitbart's video was just a shortened version of the issue only and in context. The audience had no idea that she was going to talk about redemption when they reacted about the racist comments. That is obvious because they didn't react when she discussed redemption- they were silent. But they reacted favorably to her when she advocated racism against the white farmer.. Why did the NAACP folks seem to approve of her racism?
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
It only "seems" that way to willfully ignorant neocon parrots like you who STILL hold onto the Breibart hatchet job while ignoring the evidence of the full video in full context...as I previously explained above.

I stand corrected regarding "applause" and "approval".....and once again prove you wrong on everything else. The audience did not approve of her racism, since they were aware of where she was going with the story.
Click to expand...

Southern Man said:
Breitbart's video was just a shortened version of the issue only and in context. The audience had no idea that she was going to talk about redemption when they reacted about the racist comments. That is obvious because they didn't react when she discussed redemption- they were silent. But they reacted favorably to her when she advocated racism against the white farmer.. Why did the NAACP folks seem to approve of her racism?
Click to expand...

And there you have it folks....the truth just rips away the veneer of "intellect" from the prejudice and stubborn blind partisanship of folk like the Southern Man. So all he and his like minded cronies can do is just repeat their factually and logically disproven mantras in various forms until doomsday. Southern Man is so delusional that he thinks injecting his personal interpretation (loaded with supposition and conjecture) will actually pass as FACT despite the evidence to the contrary.

Here's how I put Southy's bullshit to bed before, folks

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=683205&postcount=24

I leave the Southern Man to parroting Breitbart's dishonest mantras in stubborn defiance of ALL THE FACTS and the TRUTH that they provide. Fortunately for America, the majority of the country is not as willfully ignorant as Southy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top