gfm7175
Mega MAGA
I'm sadly noticing plenty of farms disappearing around me, too. The Madison area is growing very fast.
Denmark will sell Greenland to the USA (likely in 2026).
- Thread starter gfm7175
- Start date
Jake Starkey
Verified User
NATO is an alliance, evolving out of the Marshall Plan, which reconstructed Western Europe and gave American business tremendous profits, into a military alliance, which benefits all.
No, they said that if they do not sell to us we would have to act, either sell it or we will act... Lansing directly implied that if they did not sell the US would invade in order to avoid having to fight Germany for them. The parallels are very clear in this case.yes - they said if Germany conquers you we will have to act
you shit stains are all the same. fucking liars
If Germany occupied the Island, it would be Germany we were fighting,
so fuck off shit stain. that you lie so easily is disgusting to me
---------------------------
On November 15th the Minister again called to see me about the matter and said he was under considerable embarrassment about a question which his Government had asked, but which he had hesitated to present to me. The question was this: “Whether he thought in case the Danish Government did not agree to a sale of the Islands the United States would feel it necessary to take possession of them.”
In reply I told the Minister that while it had not been in my mind that action of this sort would be necessary, as I had hoped some formal negotiation would result in the transfer of the sovereignty, that I could conceive of circumstances which would compel such an act on our part. He asked me what these circumstances were and I replied that they were the ones to which I had previously called his attention, namely, the possible consequence of absorption of Denmark by one of the great powers of Europe. Such a loss of sovereignty would create a situation which it would be difficult to meet other than by occupation of the Islands, in view of the fact that Danish possessions would come under a different sovereignty in Europe and in case it did, the result might be very serious.
-------------------------------------
calling that a threat is insane. FUCK YOU NEOCON
Denmark was hesitant, due to segregation laws and the fact that the population was mostly black. We strong armed our way to owning those islands.
Crepitus
Verified User
Well this OP aged like milk....
Monad Portal
Was it me?
my silver or my lead.
Monad Portal
Was it me?
wow.
another anarchist retard.
this just means you love large corporations and vigilantism.
sounds like another retarded libertarian corporate blowjob boy.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
Sounds like parts of Greenland are being surrendered to the USA.
Crepitus
Verified User
LMAO!!
No, it doesn't. We always had access to expend our military bases.
tRump got exactly nothing for his braindead shenanigans.
Being in the cult means you will have all kinds of delusions to make it seem you are not wrong.
No part of Greenland is being "surrendered" to the USA. The USA has the same agreement they have had since 1951.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
Ummm, no. Wrong, yet again. Sovereignty/Control over additional land is NEW. Mineral rights is NEW.
Jake Starkey
Verified User
We have no sovereignity or control over Greenland so no mineral rights, either.
Jake Starkey
Verified User
If Denmark does sell Greenland, to us or Russia or China, then someone will have sovereignty or control over Greenland and mineral rights.
You being in a cult and believing your delusions is not NEW.
Jake Starkey
Verified User
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
YOUR issue, not mine.
More details need to come out in order to know what is truly happening, but right now it sounds like small pockets of land in Greenland are being surrendered to the USA. That is NEW and is NOT a part of the 1951 agreement with Denmark.
Ummm, no. The new deal also includes mineral rights. That is NEW and is NOT a part of the 1951 agreement with Denmark. The new deal was also made with Mark Rutte, not Denmark, which is NEW.
Jake Starkey
Verified User
Umm, no, it sounds nothing of the sort.
bullshit
I posted the exact scenario that would make this a miltary intervention - simply turning us down was not what he said
Are you that horrible at reading comprehension? is it willful ignorance from neocon shit stains that always seem to support us acting like asshole empire wannabees? explain how you can be so fucking wrong on something so simple?
" the possible consequence of absorption of Denmark by one of the great powers of Europe"
"Such a loss of sovereignty would create a situation which it would be difficult to meet other than by occupation of the Islands"
Only if one wants to think that way.,
The USA has had almost unlimited rights to act in Greenland since 1951. Nothing substantial has changed as a result of the bungling Trump is doing.
"We think this is a fair offer. We hope you accept. If you refuse, and find our enemies have captured your lands, we will take it, and you won't get anything for it"
this is how a civilized nation would reply - and what we did 100 years ago.
"We think the offer is fair. If you refuse, we will use tariffs, and won't even rule out military force. We need this land. Take the offer or else!"
that is bullshit - How does Occupying Greenland while pissing off every single nation in the world makes us safer shit stains? explain that one!
this is how a civilized nation would reply - and what we did 100 years ago.
"We think the offer is fair. If you refuse, we will use tariffs, and won't even rule out military force. We need this land. Take the offer or else!"
that is bullshit - How does Occupying Greenland while pissing off every single nation in the world makes us safer shit stains? explain that one!