Trump wants to invade Iran

signalmankenneth said:
I'm wondering what type of military leaders we currently have? Will they do anything Trump wants them to do without objection?
If Trump ask them to invade Greenland, they will have one hell of a reflection point and the consequences will be huge if they follow that order too?!!
Click to expand...
Fuck you asshole. You supported the assassination of your president so, fuck you!
 
Damocles said:
I doubt that means invasion.
Click to expand...

I'm on record as opposing bombing missions.

I support the reagan model. Provide the insurgents weapons and cripple Iran with blockaides and embargos. Don't let a drop of oil leave. Don't let Russia, North Korea, or the democrats smuggle arms in for the Mullahs.

Bombing them - which Trump did threaten, is a bad move that will harm the uprising. I think Trump means well, but it's a stupid move.
 
Hume said:
Literally, he did. Please don't play dumb troll with me...it is boring.
Click to expand...
He did not. An incursion is not an invasion. Scale and scope differences are glaring. He literally did not invade Venezuela, if he had we would still be there. Russia invaded Ukraine, they are still there... This is the difference.
 
Hume said:

Trump says help is 'on its way' as Iranian official says 2,000 killed in unrest​


www.reuters.com

Iran protests live: Trump says help is 'on its way' as Iranian official says 2,000 killed in unrest

Around 2,000 people have been killed in protests, an Iranian official told Reuters earlier on Tuesday.
www.reuters.com www.reuters.com
Click to expand...
And he meant it, because the war planes are going there.
IRGC and mullahs are going to get hit, and hit hard. Trump is not messing around with the BS.
Many are going to get blown right up.
 
Walt said:
The words are the destructive thing to the opposition. What trump will do is keep saying the opposition are American stooges, but do little else. he can't help it. he is a narcissist first and foremost.
Click to expand...
RR.jpg
 
Hume said:
Literally, he did. Please don't play dumb troll with me...it is boring.
Click to expand...
He put troops on the ground and captured their leader and his wife. They killed about 100 people. He damaged some buildings, too. I suppose that they did not stay means he did not invade Iran. Smells like an invasion.
Now he is telling Americans to leave the country, suggesting the war monger in chief is not done yet.
 
"Trump wants to invade Canada" ...
"Trump wants to invade Greenland" ...
"Trump wants to invade Gaza" ...
"Trump wants to invade Iran" ...
"Trump wants to invade Venezuela" ...
"Trump wants to invade Greenland" ...
"Trump wants to invade Minnesota" ...
"Trump wants to invade Iran" ...

🔁 🔁 🔁

:rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: TOO FUNNY!!!!!
 
Damocles said:
He did not. An incursion is not an invasion. Scale and scope differences are glaring. He literally did not invade Venezuela, if he had we would still be there. Russia invaded Ukraine, they are still there... This is the difference.
Click to expand...
You do not get to define words just because you want to.

You can say 'this is how i define incursion versus invasion' but since the US nor International courts do not define that distinction it is just your opinion and that means others can define it differently.

i am not taking a position on what you say versus the other person, and just pointing out this common error made on this forum where people 'cite their opinion as if fact just because what they say makes sense to them'.

Below is the only boundaries attached to the "invasion" which has been defined by the UN (take that as you will).





AI Summary:

The terms “invasion” vs “incursion” themselves are not defined specifically in US or International law. Those are mostly political or descriptive terms. In both U.S. law and international law, the legal line is drawn by scale, effects, and purpose of the use of force, not the label.


Here’s the clean legal framework as provided by the UN as the only group who puts some structure around the term.

UN General Assembly Definition of Aggression (1974)​


This is the closest thing to a legal “invasion” definition:


“The invasion or attack by the armed forces of a State of the territory of another State…”
Click to expand...

It lists:


  • Military occupation
  • Bombardment
  • Blockades
  • Sending armed groups across borders to destabilize governments or seize key territory or assets

But again — “invasion” here means a serious, overt use of force, not a rhetorical term.
 
QP! said:
You do not get to define words just because you want to.

You can say 'this is how i define incursion versus invasion' but since the US nor International courts do not define that distinction it is just your opinion and that means others can define it differently.

i am not taking a position on what you say versus the other person, and just pointing out this common error made on this forum where people 'cite their opinion as if fact just because what they say makes sense to them'.

Below is the only boundaries attached to the "invasion" which has been defined by the UN (take that as you will).





AI Summary:

The terms “invasion” vs “incursion” themselves are not defined specifically in US or International law. Those are mostly political or descriptive terms. In both U.S. law and international law, the legal line is drawn by scale, effects, and purpose of the use of force, not the label.


Here’s the clean legal framework as provided by the UN as the only group who puts some structure around the term.

UN General Assembly Definition of Aggression (1974)​


This is the closest thing to a legal “invasion” definition:




It lists:


  • Military occupation
  • Bombardment
  • Blockades
  • Sending armed groups across borders to destabilize governments or seize key territory or assets

But again — “invasion” here means a serious, overt use of force, not a rhetorical term.
Click to expand...
Fuck the UN, you Commie Douchebag. They've been undermining our Democracy for about a decade and a half, you fuckin' rotten cuntsuck.
Not just ours, worldwide they have been subverting elections.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top