"One of ours, all of yours" - the Trump administration goes all-in on fascism

The Trump administration wants to incite a revolt in order to respond with martial law.

  • Agreed

    Votes: 7 100.0%

  • Disagreed

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • I don't know/too old to care

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    7
Dutch Uncle

Dutch Uncle

* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
The phrase "One of Ours, All of Yours" is a controversial slogan with origins in fascism and is associated with the concept of collective punishment.
Key information regarding the phrase:
  • Fascist Origin: The phrase originated as a fascist rallying cry in 1930s Spain, used by the Falange Española movement. The original Spanish implied a hierarchy where "one of ours" (a fascist/nationalist) was worth many of "yours" (the opposition or general populace).
  • Collective Punishment: It is a slogan for collective punishment, a practice where an entire group is punished for the actions of an individual.
  • Historical Use: The slogan and the practice it represents were notably used by the Nazis and other regimes. A common historical example cited is the Nazi retaliation in villages where a German officer was killed, resulting in the mass execution of local male residents (such as in the Czech village of Lidice).
  • International Law: Collective punishment is explicitly forbidden under Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, which states that "no civilian may be punished for an offense they have not personally committed".
  • Recent Controversy: In January 2026, the phrase gained recent attention when it appeared on a podium used by U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem during a press conference following a controversial ICE agent shooting incident. This use sparked significant public criticism and accusations of employing a "Nazi slogan" and promoting extremist ideologies.
Google AI

MAGAts should read more history instead of just reading Trump's tweets and comments about how he is not bound by international law.

They're also too fucking stupid and/or ignorant to realize the obvious reaction of American patriots to a massive ICE atrocity, wiping out a neighborhood for the killing of an ICE agent.

ah9s6i.jpg
 
Dutch Uncle said:
The phrase "One of Ours, All of Yours" is a controversial slogan with origins in fascism and is associated with the concept of collective punishment.
Key information regarding the phrase:
  • Fascist Origin: The phrase originated as a fascist rallying cry in 1930s Spain, used by the Falange Española movement. The original Spanish implied a hierarchy where "one of ours" (a fascist/nationalist) was worth many of "yours" (the opposition or general populace).
  • Collective Punishment: It is a slogan for collective punishment, a practice where an entire group is punished for the actions of an individual.
  • Historical Use: The slogan and the practice it represents were notably used by the Nazis and other regimes. A common historical example cited is the Nazi retaliation in villages where a German officer was killed, resulting in the mass execution of local male residents (such as in the Czech village of Lidice).
  • International Law: Collective punishment is explicitly forbidden under Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, which states that "no civilian may be punished for an offense they have not personally committed".
  • Recent Controversy: In January 2026, the phrase gained recent attention when it appeared on a podium used by U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem during a press conference following a controversial ICE agent shooting incident. This use sparked significant public criticism and accusations of employing a "Nazi slogan" and promoting extremist ideologies.
Google AI

MAGAts should read more history instead of just reading Trump's tweets and comments about how he is not bound by international law.

They're also too fucking stupid and/or ignorant to realize the obvious reaction of American patriots to a massive ICE atrocity, wiping out a neighborhood for the killing of an ICE agent.

ah9s6i.jpg
Click to expand...
Mara lago face, Puppy Killer is a fascist, America’s own Irma Grese.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
The phrase "One of Ours, All of Yours" is a controversial slogan with origins in fascism and is associated with the concept of collective punishment.
Key information regarding the phrase:
  • Fascist Origin: The phrase originated as a fascist rallying cry in 1930s Spain, used by the Falange Española movement. The original Spanish implied a hierarchy where "one of ours" (a fascist/nationalist) was worth many of "yours" (the opposition or general populace).
  • Collective Punishment: It is a slogan for collective punishment, a practice where an entire group is punished for the actions of an individual.
  • Historical Use: The slogan and the practice it represents were notably used by the Nazis and other regimes. A common historical example cited is the Nazi retaliation in villages where a German officer was killed, resulting in the mass execution of local male residents (such as in the Czech village of Lidice).
  • International Law: Collective punishment is explicitly forbidden under Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, which states that "no civilian may be punished for an offense they have not personally committed".
  • Recent Controversy: In January 2026, the phrase gained recent attention when it appeared on a podium used by U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem during a press conference following a controversial ICE agent shooting incident. This use sparked significant public criticism and accusations of employing a "Nazi slogan" and promoting extremist ideologies.
Google AI

MAGAts should read more history instead of just reading Trump's tweets and comments about how he is not bound by international law.

They're also too fucking stupid and/or ignorant to realize the obvious reaction of American patriots to a massive ICE atrocity, wiping out a neighborhood for the killing of an ICE agent.

ah9s6i.jpg
Click to expand...
People are running out of tolerance for this insanity. I'm expecting someone to reach their limit and start lining up ICE clowns for a "Kirk-y shoot" daily.

I don;t want it to happen, but I don't see any way it won't.
 
Crepitus said:
People are running out of tolerance for this insanity. I'm expecting someone to reach their limit and start lining up ICE clowns for a "Kirk-y shoot" daily.

I don;t want it to happen, but I don't see any way it won't.
Click to expand...
Agreed....and not all of them are liberals wearing pink pussy hats. LOL

The white nationalist hate group Threepers often lied about how only "3%" Americans participated in the American Revolution. The lie was obviously for self-serving reasons, but if used against the MAGAts, then they might recognize they are toast. :)

As the Google AI quote below notes, about 7 to 8% of Americans actually participated in fighting tyranny (i.e. "violence"). Simply having "rough men stand ready" isn't enough, especially in a guerrilla war. Having almost 50% of the population supportive with less than 15% supportive of their English King, Orange Jesus, narcissistic tyrant, etc produces significant results. Supportive means everything from supplies, intelligence and infiltrating agencies of the tyrants. The tyrants can't do it alone, ya know! We outnumber them. LOL

From Google AI:
What percentage of Americans participated in the American Revolution?

The claim that only 3% of Americans participated in the American Revolution is a widely circulated
myth. Historians estimate that the actual percentage of the population that actively served in a military capacity (Continental Army or militia) was much higher, likely between 15% and 25% of the total population, and perhaps as high as 40-50% of the eligible male population.
Estimates vary depending on how "participation" is defined (full-time soldiers vs. part-time militia, or including support roles) and the region of the colonies.
  • Active Military Service: An estimated 175,000–200,000 men served in the Continental Army and Patriot militias over the course of the war. With a total colonial population of about 2.5 million, this represents about 7% to 8% of the total population. If only the white, free male population is counted (excluding women, children, and enslaved people who were generally prohibited from fighting), the percentage of military-age men who served was much higher, closer to half.
  • Patriot Support: Broader support for the Patriot cause (including civilian support) was also high. Historians estimate that roughly 40-45% of the white population supported the Patriots, about 15-20% were Loyalists, and the remainder remained neutral.
  • Loyalists: A significant portion of the population remained loyal to the British Crown, with estimates ranging from 15% to over 30%. Some Loyalists even formed their own military units to fight alongside the British.
  • Neutrals: Many colonists attempted to remain neutral, simply trying to continue their daily lives and avoid the conflict, although sentiment often shifted depending on which side controlled their area.
The "three percent" figure appears to have originated from a miscalculation or deliberate misrepresentation of the number of veterans who applied for pensions decades after the war ended, which only accounted for a fraction of those who actually served.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
The phrase "One of Ours, All of Yours" is a controversial slogan with origins in fascism and is associated with the concept of collective punishment.
Key information regarding the phrase:
  • Fascist Origin: The phrase originated as a fascist rallying cry in 1930s Spain, used by the Falange Española movement. The original Spanish implied a hierarchy where "one of ours" (a fascist/nationalist) was worth many of "yours" (the opposition or general populace).
  • Collective Punishment: It is a slogan for collective punishment, a practice where an entire group is punished for the actions of an individual.
  • Historical Use: The slogan and the practice it represents were notably used by the Nazis and other regimes. A common historical example cited is the Nazi retaliation in villages where a German officer was killed, resulting in the mass execution of local male residents (such as in the Czech village of Lidice).
  • International Law: Collective punishment is explicitly forbidden under Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, which states that "no civilian may be punished for an offense they have not personally committed".
  • Recent Controversy: In January 2026, the phrase gained recent attention when it appeared on a podium used by U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem during a press conference following a controversial ICE agent shooting incident. This use sparked significant public criticism and accusations of employing a "Nazi slogan" and promoting extremist ideologies.
Google AI

MAGAts should read more history instead of just reading Trump's tweets and comments about how he is not bound by international law.

They're also too fucking stupid and/or ignorant to realize the obvious reaction of American patriots to a massive ICE atrocity, wiping out a neighborhood for the killing of an ICE agent.

ah9s6i.jpg
Click to expand...
1768345599341.png
If we have a revolt, I don't believe Trump will have all the loyalty of all the military either?!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top