What’s the justification for taking this 2nd tanker?

[Jarod]

The first one was legal due to an embargo, but I understood this one was not under that embargo.

Are we free to just take ships on the high sea without any reason?

 

[FastLane]

The first one was legal due to an embargo, but I understood this one was not under that embargo.

Are we free to just take ships on the high sea without any reason?

If it was transporting embargoed oil it should be taken.

 

[Hawkeye10]

For one thing it is a warning to DragonBear that if they dont submit to the Imperial Empire then pirates on the seas will attack their shipping.

DragonBear is currently saying around the globe "This is why America has to go.....Humanity must have better leadership."

 

[Hawkeye10]

For one thing the Imperial Empire demands that it must have total control of ship insurance.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

 

[T. A. Gardner]

The first one was legal due to an embargo, but I understood this one was not under that embargo.

Are we free to just take ships on the high sea without any reason?

Tanker + oil + Venezuela embargoed = they lose their tanker.

 

[FastLane]

2 down and 17 to go.

 

[FastLane]

Tanker + oil + Venezuela embargoed = they lose their tanker.

I guess Jarod does not think our drones are watching.

 

[Jarod]

If it was transporting embargoed oil it should be taken.

If that’s true ok.

 

[Jarod]

I guess Jarod does not think our drones are watching.

Was it embargoed

 

[Into the Night]

The first one was legal due to an embargo, but I understood this one was not under that embargo.

Are we free to just take ships on the high sea without any reason?

Not about an embargo, Pretender. The 2nd ship was taken for the same reason as the 1st.