If God were real, you wouldn’t need a book

You are bouncing around all over the map. You just claimed in the previous post you base belief on faith, not evidence.
Religion, by nature, is faith based. That doesn't mean that evidence for Christianity is discarded. In fact, it is often embraced.
If I were to consider Christianity on a rational basis, I would need an intellectual foundation based on logic, inference, and historical data.
First, you would need to understand the truth that a circular argument (in and of itself) isn't a logical fallacy. You would also need to realize some of the other instances in your life in which you likewise have faith (even for something as simple as sitting down in a chair and having faith that the chair is going to hold you upright).
 
It is foolish to have faith without evidence.

I would never even consider Christianity to be possibility unless I could convince myself it is rational.
Nothing rational about Christianity!
It comes down to a few points that are either true or they aren't!
Starting with Jesus!
For Jesus to be the real deal, Jesus has to be YHWH,that became a man known as Jesus! That Jesus AKA YHWH freely gave his life,so that Sinners would have a chance to have eternal life in the Spirit!
If Jesus isn't exactly who he claimed to be,then Christianity doesn't really exist! And the Jews were right,the Messiah still has come yet!
 
The Halo over their heads is how the ancients,explained in pictures,what they felt as far as the Holy Spirit!
That's the proof doubters can't comprehend!
Without the Holy Spirit ,Christianity would have died out,probably within a decade of Jesus heading home!
FB_IMG_1762200110814.jpg
 
Nothing rational about Christianity!
It comes down to a few points that are either true or they aren't!
Starting with Jesus!
For Jesus to be the real deal, Jesus has to be YHWH,that became a man known as Jesus! That Jesus AKA YHWH freely gave his life,so that Sinners would have a chance to have eternal life in the Spirit!
If Jesus isn't exactly who he claimed to be,then Christianity doesn't really exist! And the Jews were right,the Messiah still has come yet!
The mathematical rationality, lawful organization, and fine tuning of the cosmos is actually pretty decent circumstantial evidence pointing to a higher rational organizing force or law-giving entity. It's illogical to believe the rational can come from the irrational, or that order and organization are caused by inanimate chance.

The historical record for the ministry, crucifixion, and post-crucifixion appearances of Jesus to his followers is actually pretty decent, even if a lot of the other purported secondary miracles seem to be hyperbole, symbolic, or exaggerated.
 
You are bouncing around all over the map.
Cliche fallacy. I have not changed my position at all.
You just claimed in the previous post you base belief on faith, not evidence.
ALL religion is based on faith. Evidence can support faith.
If I were to consider Christianity on a rational basis, I would need an intellectual foundation based on logic, inference, and historical data.
You deny logic. You deny history. Spewing buzzwords like you do is not being intellectual.
 
The mathematical rationality, lawful organization,, and fine tuning of the cosmos is actually pretty decent circumstantial evidence pointing to a rational organizing force or law-giving entity. It's illogical to believe the rational can come from the irrational, or that order and organization are caused by inanimate chance.

The historical record for the life, crucifixion, and post-crucifixion appearances of Jesus to his followers is actually pretty decent, even if a lot of the other miracles seem to be hyperbole, symbolic, or exaggerated.
You either believe Jesus is YHWH incarnate in the flesh or you don't!
No organized religion necessary!
 
How do you know? It very well COULD be 6,000 years old.

What doesn't make sense about the biblical genealogy from Adam to Jesus as presented in the book of Luke? The life expectancy of humans HAS varied widely over time.
The 6000 year figure was Assumed under the Assumption the 6 days of creation were 24 hour days! FYI the Sun and Moon were created till day 4!
 
The mathematical rationality, lawful organization, and fine tuning of the cosmos
The Universe is unorganized.
is actually pretty decent circumstantial evidence pointing to a higher rational organizing force or law-giving entity.
How? The Universe is unorganized.
It's illogical to believe the rational can come from the irrational, or that order and organization are caused by inanimate chance.
Buzzword fallacies. Go learn English and logic.
The historical record for the ministry,
...such as...?
crucifixion,
Crucifixion was used as a punishment of criminals against the state, including those who stood against Rome.
and post-crucifixion appearances of Jesus to his followers is actually pretty decent,
So the evidence is the Bible. Fine. The Bible is evidence. All you can claim objectively, however, is that the Bible exists and that it describes this material.
even if a lot of the other purported secondary miracles seem to be hyperbole, symbolic, or exaggerated.
Why would you think any miracle is hyperbole, symbolic,or exaggerated??
Now you argue against the Bible. You can't have it both ways!
 
But nobody actually consistently follows the Golden rule and the Sermon on the mount.
You don't get to speak for everybody. Omniscience fallacy.
You can't be on this board for 30 minutes without being insulted, demeaned, cursed at... often by posters who claim to be practicing Christians.
Nothing about the Sermon on the Mount nor the Golden Rule prevents this.
My colleagues are ECLA Lutherans, and that progressive kind of Christianity is fine with me.
Yet they deny the teaching of Jesus Christ almost completely.
How can they call themselves 'Christianity'?
 
The Universe is unorganized!
einstein-field-equation-science-photo-library.jpg


0*07PokRJESj7gNGQk.png
 
So the evidence is the Bible. Fine. The Bible is evidence. All you can claim objectively, however, is that the Bible exists and that it describes this material!
That's wrong.

The life of Jesus is attested to outside the canon, by Romans, Jews, Syrians, Greeks.

The resurrection account is attested to outside the Bible by people who knew and interviewed the eyewitnesses: Polycarp, Ireneus, Clement.
 
How do you know? It very well COULD be 6,000 years old.
Tell me you're a science denier without telling me you're a science denier.
What doesn't make sense about the biblical genealogy from Adam to Jesus as presented in the book of Luke?
Separate topic.
The life expectancy of humans HAS varied widely over time.
It hasn't varied enough to make the geneology, and expected life expectancy of each generation, to get anywhere close to the actual age of the earth.

If you know a house has been in a family for "3 generations" you can make a reasonable estimate regarding how long the house has been in the family.

If you know that same family was the original owner, and the house has been in the family for 3 generations, you can make a reasonable estimate on how old the house is.
 
Flood left a real mess! Drain the Atlantic, dig around in the mud, you might find what you're looking for on Main St in Downtown Atlantis!

IF the Noachian flood had happened there would be a consistent layer denoting that that was global in extent. We have an analogue in the form of the KT boundary which marks when the Xixilub impact happened. It seeded iridium in rocks all over the world. It shows up as an anomaly.

ALSO: if a global flood had happened it would leave rather specific types of deposits that would mark the event.

AND we'd see a huge portion of the global fossil record that was "empty" as the world repopulated from one place.

There's no way what we see in the rock record today to assume a global flood happened. It just doesn't bear witness to that.

The Noachian Flood would have to have been actively HIDDEN by God for it to be real and the globe to be as it is today. That would make God dishonest which is illogical.
 
IF the Noachian flood had happened there would be a consistent layer denoting that that was global in extent. We have an analogue in the form of the KT boundary which marks when the Xixilub impact happened. It seeded iridium in rocks all over the world. It shows up as an anomaly.

ALSO: if a global flood had happened it would leave rather specific types of deposits that would mark the event.

AND we'd see a huge portion of the global fossil record that was "empty" as the world repopulated from one place.

There's no way what we see in the rock record today to assume a global flood happened. It just doesn't bear witness to that.

The Noachian Flood would have to have been actively HIDDEN by God for it to be real and the globe to be as it is today. That would make God dishonest which is illogical.
The Flood destroyed the World Secular System! Not the planet or none secular people.
 
Back
Top