Pam strikes out, again, is there any competent Trump appointee

archives

Verified User

“Justice Department again fails to re-indict New York Attorney General Letitia James”​

“A grand jury declined for a second time in a week to re-indict New York Attorney General Letitia James on Thursday in another major blow to the Justice Department’s efforts to prosecute the president’s political opponents.”

“The repeated failures amounted to a stunning rebuke of prosecutors’ bid to resurrect a criminal case President Donald Trump pressured them to bring, and hinted at a growing public leeriness of the administration’s retribution campaign.”

“A grand jury rejection is an unusual circumstance in any case, but is especially stinging for a Justice Department that has been steadfast in its determination to seek revenge against Trump foes like James and former FBI Director James Comey. On separate occasions, citizens have heard the government’s evidence against James and have come away underwhelmed”


Wasn’t it Trump’s man Justice Scalia who said anyone could get a Grand Jury to indict a baloney sandwich

This is the third attempt rejected, you’d think there is some applicable legal ethics that implies enough is enough, but Pam will surely try it again, even if she has to create her own “evidence,” the Messiah demands it
 

“Justice Department again fails to re-indict New York Attorney General Letitia James”​

“A grand jury declined for a second time in a week to re-indict New York Attorney General Letitia James on Thursday in another major blow to the Justice Department’s efforts to prosecute the president’s political opponents.”

“The repeated failures amounted to a stunning rebuke of prosecutors’ bid to resurrect a criminal case President Donald Trump pressured them to bring, and hinted at a growing public leeriness of the administration’s retribution campaign.”

“A grand jury rejection is an unusual circumstance in any case, but is especially stinging for a Justice Department that has been steadfast in its determination to seek revenge against Trump foes like James and former FBI Director James Comey. On separate occasions, citizens have heard the government’s evidence against James and have come away underwhelmed”


Wasn’t it Trump’s man Justice Scalia who said anyone could get a Grand Jury to indict a baloney sandwich

This is the third attempt rejected, you’d think there is some applicable legal ethics that implies enough is enough, but Pam will surely try it again, even if she has to create her own “evidence,” the Messiah demands it
Yeah, all the others, Anchovies. I reckon Bondi will have to go and a competent put in to replace her. I am disappoint.
I thought she could do things. It appears I was mistaken.
 
Trump is winning. He does not need to win the cases. They are vindictive prosecutions designed to make his chosen victim miserable and spend money on lawyers. Trump is a grade A prick and he shows it every day.
 
Back
Top