Hegseth: must refuse illegal orders!

The Ninth Commandment Meaning – False Testimony

There are two parts involved in giving false testimony…

First, in the days of Moses, God wanted the Israelites to have an effective legal system so the country could survive as a nation.

And second, lying breaks down a society. And, it could lead to destruction of the nation.
 
Earl said:
The Ninth Commandment Meaning – False Testimony

There are two parts involved in giving false testimony…

First, in the days of Moses, God wanted the Israelites to have an effective legal system so the country could survive as a nation.

And second, lying breaks down a society. And, it could lead to destruction of the nation.
Click to expand...
And when you say I claimed to cook eggs at a Yacht Club you are violating that.
 
RB 60 said:
The point being, if it was an illegal order. any one who received the order could have refused. But didn't. So was it an illegal order if no one refused?
Click to expand...
Honest question to you RB.

Reread your question and ask yourself if that is anything a smart person would ask?

For instance if in the history of the military and police do you believe we cannot cite any illegal orders given and followed?

You are pushing a position that as long as no refuses that somehow must mean it is legal, and that is something even the least poorly educated should know is stupid.
 
Anyone would be required to refuse if Germany asked them to burn Jews, nobody refused so clearly nobody ordered them to do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QP!
Jarod said:
Anyone would be required to refuse if Germany asked them to burn Jews, nobody refused so clearly nobody ordered them to do it.
Click to expand...
@RB 60 reads the above and nods his head in agreement as he ACTUALLY thinks that you can prove there has never been an illegal order given in the US that was then followed and his proof is 'it must not be illegal or someone would refuse'.
 
QP! said:
@RB 60 reads the above and nods his head in agreement as he ACTUALLY thinks that you can prove there has never been an illegal order given in the US that was then followed and his proof is 'it must not be illegal or someone would refuse'.
Click to expand...
Only Dumb shits believe that stuff.
 
QP! said:
Honest question to you RB.

Reread your question and ask yourself if that is anything a smart person would ask?

For instance if in the history of the military and police do you believe we cannot cite any illegal orders given and followed?

You are pushing a position that as long as no refuses that somehow must mean it is legal, and that is something even the least poorly educated should know is stupid.
Click to expand...

It was a legitimate question, pee pee.

What other "illegal" orders were given during war times? Do some researching pee pee.

Are you going to reprimand every person involved in that order? I find it amusing you have
to constantly accuse others of being poorly educated and stupid when you should take a long
look in a mirror. You ain't as smart as you think you are. Well, are you going to search for every
"illegal" order ever given and make a mad rush to point them out to your biased judges?
 
FastLane said:
Do you think Obama gave the military illegal orders when they drop 16,000 bombs on Iraq or when the droned two American citizens with Hellfire missiles.
?
Click to expand...
You can also give the "kill list", literally a list of people we intended to kill... He did that "for us"... so nice.
 
QP! said:
@RB 60 reads the above and nods his head in agreement as he ACTUALLY thinks that you can prove there has never been an illegal order given in the US that was then followed and his proof is 'it must not be illegal or someone would refuse'.
Click to expand...

Why are you lying, pee pee? I never said that. Learn to read before you make a bigger ass of yourself than you already have :rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top