Trump claiming these boat drivers in Venezuela are drug runners requires some proof. They offer none, because Trump does not require proof. Justice, truth and the American way do. Would Trump feel badly if he killed innocent people? hell no. He talks about killing from a distance almost like sport.
The New York Times Just Blew WaPo’s Hegseth War Crimes Story Out of the Water
- Thread starter Earl
- Start date
So you’re asking for background to justify my opinion? Is that correct? That is different than asking for a citation.
You were asking me to justify an opinion about there being no evidence. You should understand about rhetoric and justification of claims. You cannot provide evidence of a negative, I cannot provide evidence that there is nothing available. You, in order to prove me wrong would have to provide some evidence to the contrary.
I believe it because I’ve seen no credible evidence to the contrary.
You said TACO lied about this. Put up or shut up.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Should be easy to prove that Biden set people up.
QP!
Verified User
Has any Magat even attempted to answer my question below?
-----------
Can a magat here show me anywhere in the code conduct that allows anyone in the military to put this rule aside if, in their discretion they believe "...a survivor... out of combat... due to ship destruction...", is not "... considered hors de combat (out of the fight)..." and thus can be targeted and killed?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From the U.S. Military Code of Conduct
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If an American war ship was blown up and some of the personell was floating in the water clinging to wreckage, an opposing army could assume they were trying (hoping) for a US war ship to save them and they would rejoin the fight. So do magats believe every single US service person in that spot is fair game to kill, if the opposing commander simply says 'I think they were trying to rejoin the fight"?
-----------
Can a magat here show me anywhere in the code conduct that allows anyone in the military to put this rule aside if, in their discretion they believe "...a survivor... out of combat... due to ship destruction...", is not "... considered hors de combat (out of the fight)..." and thus can be targeted and killed?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From the U.S. Military Code of Conduct
- and survivors of maritime warfare who are “out of combat” due to ship destruction
- Enemy personnel in the water from a destroyed vessel are considered hors de combat (out of the fight)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If an American war ship was blown up and some of the personell was floating in the water clinging to wreckage, an opposing army could assume they were trying (hoping) for a US war ship to save them and they would rejoin the fight. So do magats believe every single US service person in that spot is fair game to kill, if the opposing commander simply says 'I think they were trying to rejoin the fight"?
Go for it then.
So you admit you lied.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
That's Trump's duty, isn't it?
You brought it up so it is your duty.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
What is the conversation between you and Jarod about?
About what? My opinion?
No I said it was my opinion he lied, dumb shit!
I have no proof, it’s my opinion, if it were fact I would say it as fact, not opinion. Maybe pick a class in rhetoric, I did that my freshman year in college.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
War on Drugs was started and continued by Republicans.
Do your own research
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
I said that I do not believe there is any evidence Biden set anyone up "for prosecution".
He wants a citation for my belief in the non-existence of evidence.