Hegseth issues an illegal order.

During an active war against Nazis you cannot do that. You are not firing on their boats to bring them to justice or arrest them. You bomb their ship to blow it out of the fucking water and destroy that ships capabilities and kill all on it.

And yet legally you can not just bomb the capsized disabled ship again and you MUST render aid to the nazi's stranded in the water.
As "terrorists" they don't have the same legal standing uniformed soldiers do.
 
Where did you get this nonsense that a fisherman was piloting the narco boat? Do you
have his name and do you know if he caught any fish on that trip?
His name was Carranza.

 
As "terrorists" they don't have the same legal standing uniformed soldiers do.
Please cite the law of statute that would allow the Military to ignore the below based on what you say.

Because we know just saying the word 'terrorist', even if we grant that, does not give the military power to do anything they want (torture) and they still have to follow rules, when it comes to disabled enemies (of any kind) who are no longer posing a threat.


From the U.S. Military Code of Conduct

  • and survivors of maritime warfare who are “out of combat” due to ship destruction


  • Enemy personnel in the water from a destroyed vessel are considered hors de combat (out of the fight)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If an American war ship was blown up and some of the personell was floating in the water clinging to wreckage, an opposing army could assume they were trying (hoping) for a US war ship to save them and they would rejoin the fight. So do magats believe every single US service person in that spot is fair game to kill, if the opposing commander simply says 'I think they were trying to rejoin the fight"?
 
I was only saying IF he did, and there ARE some people on here that think he did. then he should be brought up and charged with it the same way Trump should be.
You are desperately clinging to talking points that were debunked days ago.

Accept that you lost again. What Dishonorable Kelly did was sedition, incitement to mutiny. He, along with the rest of the Seditious Six are traitors and oath breakers.
 
Are you senile? The so called nacro-terrorists.
Due to the epic failure of your deaf studies, you couldn't possibly have known that you are responsible for including all antecedents in your posts. Your life is a case study of tragedy, explaining why your existence ultimately manifested as a dishonest leftist.

That's the British version.
Specifically Welsh.

Neither is that one.

Due to the epic failure of your deaf studies, you couldn't possibly have known how to discern that my sentence is a complete one.
 
And yet legally you can not just bomb the capsized disabled ship again and you MUST render aid to the nazi's stranded in the water.
The narco-boat had not capsized and the narco-terrorists had not abandonded the valid, mimlitary target.

No magat here going to explain why this crystal clear rule of engagement does not apply? @T. A. Gardner ?
Your "crystal clear rule of engagement" is merely your mistaken, TDS-generated, operating delusion.
 
I understand the United States Code of Military Comduct.

You are about to scream, “YOU CANT HANDLE THE TRUTH, I ordered the code red.”
and as a supposed lawyer, you think that 'the law is the law', yet on the ground combat, like law enforcement having broad discretion due to rapidly evolving circumstances, gets a lot of latitude. Trying to prosecute something like this is almost a guaranteed loss for you.
 
Back
Top