Question: What happened to the Epstein files?

[IBDaMann]

I am saying the DoJ needs to follow the law ...

Nope. You are insisting that kiddie-porn be released to the public. Why?

 

[IBDaMann]

That wasn't my claim at all. But thanks for the laugh. Your strawman was quite hilarious.

Great, you don't plan to support your claim, and it stands refuted. Now we can both move onto something else.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Nope. You are insisting that kiddie-porn be released to the public. Why?

You keep claiming it is kiddie porn. What evidence do you have that there is kiddie porn?

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Great, you don't plan to support your claim, and it stands refuted. Now we can both move onto something else.

I don't plan to defend your straw man. My claim stands since your only rebuttal is to lie about what I said. Thanks for playing "IBDaMann is disingenuous."

 

[IBDaMann]

You keep claiming it is kiddie porn. What evidence do you have that there is kiddie porn?

Please keep up. Pam Bondi held a press conference and announced what they had on Epstein. Spoiler Alert: thousands of kiddie porn videos.

 

[IBDaMann]

I don't plan to defend your straw man.

Your claim is not my strawman.

My claim stands [dismissed].

FTFY. Exactly.

since your only rebuttal is to lie about what I said.

Nope. You won't support your claim, it is dismissed, and your argument is refuted.

 

[AProudLefty]

I'm figuring the biggest loser when all the files are public will be Bill Clinton.

He likes the big boned women.

 

[AProudLefty]

Please keep up. Pam Bondi held a press conference and announced what they had on Epstein. Spoiler Alert: thousands of kiddie porn videos.

Say so is not evidence.

Put down that half pipe full of crack.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Please keep up. Pam Bondi held a press conference and announced what they had on Epstein. Spoiler Alert: thousands of kiddie porn videos.

Why do you think that would be released under the law?

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Your claim is not my strawman.

It was not my claim. It was your misrepresentation of my position, ie a straw man.

FTFY. Exactly.

Changing what I said yet again, only weakens your position even more.

Nope. You won't support your claim, it is dismissed, and your argument is refuted.

George III proves that kings did not own all the land in Europe in 1773 which shows my claim is supported. Your straw man is not my position.
This is my position -

Since you are convinced you are so smart please provide a source or two that shows that all land in Europe was owned by the various royal families through the 1800s.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

He likes the big boned women.

Here I thought he liked to bone women.

 

[IBDaMann]

Why do you think that would be released under the law?

Why are you insisting that Bondi release kiddie porn to the public? Bondi publicly announced that she had thousands of kiddie porn files that she absolutely would not release to the public and you immediately jumped on JPP to insist that she release those files.

Why are you so vehemently demanding that Bondi release child porn to the public? Are you a sick bastard?

 

[IBDaMann]

*

The role of peasant and landlord was critical to the feudal society. Land grants flowed from the Monarchy to various Nobles - as previously explained who had a host of underlings who then had landlords that directly oversaw the peasants below them.

The nobility could seize the lands at will should a particularly landlord displease them. The Crown likewise could and did seize lands from Nobles as the Crown saw fit - for any or no reason.

In most monarchies the kings rarely had the power you think they did. They were beholden to the landowners (nobility) for their power.

... except those kings who made landowners through his power of granting land.

How many kings do you think were able to grant land in 1773? Was it all European kings? Or was it very few European kings?

Most of them, i.e. >50%

Name them.

Here's how we will play this:
1. You will list all the European kings in existence in 1773 (without omitting any).
2. You will explain how each one did not have the power to grant land.
3. I will rebut.

I don't plan to defend your straw man.

This is the point that you tipped your king, fled to the hills, abandoned your argument and left @Uncensored2008 the reigning, defending, feudalistic middleweight champion by way of second round submission.

 

[Lionfish]

I already mentioned George III who is the only monarch the Monarchists in the colonies were concerned about.

But the reality is you are supporting the original claim so feel free to support that claim any time or have your support of that claim dismissed with that claim.

Far too many 'claims' in your post.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Why are you insisting that Bondi release kiddie porn to the public? Bondi publicly announced that she had thousands of kiddie porn files that she absolutely would not release to the public and you immediately jumped on JPP to insist that she release those files.

Why are you so vehemently demanding that Bondi release child porn to the public? Are you a sick bastard?

It's for the same reason PRS sides with narco-terrorists, wants ICE to stop deporting heinous criminals, wants Trump to stop firing deadwood in the federal bureaucracy, and pretty much anything else Trump wants to do he's utterly and completely opposed to simply because Trump is the one doing it.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Why are you insisting that Bondi release kiddie porn to the public? Bondi publicly announced that she had thousands of kiddie porn files that she absolutely would not release to the public and you immediately jumped on JPP to insist that she release those files.

Why are you so vehemently demanding that Bondi release child porn to the public? Are you a sick bastard?

And there you go again. Accusing me of watching kiddie porn.

The law specifically allows for the redaction of all victim information. Your continued lies about what will be released shows you are nothing but a liar when it comes to the Epstein files.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Which kings could do that in 1773?

Most of them, i.e. >50%


Most of them, i.e. >50%

Thanks for pointing to your post where it is YOU that makes the claim about kings. Not only have you tipped your king, you can't even name one to support your claim.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

It's for the same reason PRS sides with narco-terrorists, wants ICE to stop deporting heinous criminals, wants Trump to stop firing deadwood in the federal bureaucracy, and pretty much anything else Trump wants to do he's utterly and completely opposed to simply because Trump is the one doing it.

Aren't you cute with all your cult bullshit. Why don't you grow a pair and actually say you are accusing me of watching kiddie porn.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Aren't you cute with all your cult bullshit. Why don't you grow a pair and actually say you are accusing me of watching kiddie porn.

That would be a potential 12b violation whereas pointing out that you side with criminals is true and accurate proven with your own posts.

 

[Maze]

That would be a potential 12b violation whereas pointing out that you side with criminals is true and accurate proven with your own posts.

Trump is a literal convicted criminal and you support him. Stop projecting your BS on others.