How Does Trump Compel His Detractors to Make Their Avatars in His Image?

[AProudLefty]

So you agree that you flat out lied. You never publicly called for your King Obama to be investigated for war crimes.

We all knew this, you are notorious for lying about supposed posts from back when.

It's expected, you lie about everything.

It's right there.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Not officially. A lot of people call it the MAGA Party.

Only on MSNBC (CCPNOW!) - but you are glued to that 24/7 - they tell you what you think and feel.

 

[AProudLefty]

Only on MSNBC (CCPNOW!) - but you are glued to that 24/7 - they tell you what you think and feel.

I don't watch it.

 

[Tobytone]

Then you should know what I mean. The term TDS isn't original. BDS, Bush Derangement Syndrome was coined.

Who the hell cares? You obviously didn't take my advice about the pipe.

 

[Uncensored2008]

It's right there.

No, it sure isn't. You are again lying. Saying "go ahead and investigate as you frame Hegseth" is not a public call to prosecute Obama for War Crimess.

You lied, then used you usual "I posted this before" bullshit to try and weasel out of your lie.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I don't watch it.

You didn't finish your sentence.

More than 23 hours a day.

 

[IBDaMann]

Reading comprehension is not your thing.

English composition is not your thing, nor is math.

I said the party is not official even when some wanted it to be.

What does officialness have to do with anything? Perhaps you don't understand the concept of "not a party." Who are the "some" who wanted the not-a-party to be official? Why does any of this matter?

You and your ilk.

Isn't everybody not in a not-a-party?

Wow thanks for the admission.

Who did I admit? ... and to what not-a-party did I admit him/her/them/they/zhe/twif?

 

[AProudLefty]

English composition is not your thing, nor is math.


What does officialness have to do with anything? Perhaps you don't understand the concept of "not a party." Who are the "some" who wanted the not-a-party to be official? Why does any of this matter?


Isn't everybody not in a not-a-party?


Who did I admit? ... and to what not-a-party did I admit him/her/them/they/zhe/twif?

You admitted you're not intelligent. Baby steps.

 

[AProudLefty]

No, it sure isn't. You are again lying. Saying "go ahead and investigate as you frame Hegseth" is not a public call to prosecute Obama for War Crimess.

You lied, then used you usual "I posted this before" bullshit to try and weasel out of your lie.

Nitpicking is your thing. Not mine. Obama should be investigated. So does Bush.

 

[AProudLefty]

Who the hell cares? You obviously didn't take my advice about the pipe.

What pipe? Yours?

 

[archives]

... it means that the DNC is telling "pollsters" what to publish, as though there were actually an underlying poll. The intended audience is the eternally gullible.

If elections were held today, Trump would win in an avalanche. You are gullible.


I take it you don't see the independent nature of what one accomplishes and what the DNC has the rabidly Marxist Trump-HATING press write about Trump. You are gullible.

The DNC is telling Fox’s, RCP’s, even the Razzy’s pollsters what to publish?

Right, the GOP stands to lose the House dramatically because of Trump but Trump would win in an avalanche if he ran today, pretty funny, all the Putin’s, Murdoch’s, and Joe Rogan’s couldn’t get Donnie across the finish line today

Your “independent nature” equates to swallowing all the bullshit Maralago peddles, Trump ain’t tweeting long hours of the night because he feels confident in what he is “accomplishing”

 

[IBDaMann]

You admitted you're not intelligent. Baby steps.

Once again, you cannot read.

 

[AProudLefty]

Once again, you cannot read.

Then you are claiming to be intelligent now?

You are in a world of hurt.

Playing chess with you can be boring.

 

[IBDaMann]

The DNC is telling Fox’s, RCP’s, even the Razzy’s pollsters what to publish?

It's more like the DNC is crafting (magically crafting) the desired "poll results" and distributing them to cohorts in the MSM for immediate public release. If you believe there is actually a poll behind those "poll results" then you are gullible.

Right, the GOP stands to lose the House dramatically because of Trump

You're a moron. The Republicans stand to lose the House because they have the House. The Democrats do not stand to lose the House because they do not have the House.

Can you follow the logic. There is no Trump in that picture, despite your TDS telling you that Trump is responsible for all the galactic warming in this quadrant.

but Trump would win in an avalanche if he ran today,

Correct. That much is obvious.

Your “independent nature” equates to swallowing all the bullshit Maralago peddles,

What booooolsch't am I swallowing from Mar-A-Lago?

Trump ain’t tweeting long hours of the night because he feels confident in what he is “accomplishing”

Could I get you to speak in English?

 

[IBDaMann]

Then you are claiming to be intelligent now?

You have no sense of logic, remember?

 

[AProudLefty]

You have no sense of logic, remember?

Says the guy who cannot comprehend the logic of being asked if he was being terrorized.

 

[IBDaMann]

What pipe? Yours?

Maybe it was a half-pipe.

 

[AProudLefty]

Maybe it was a half-pipe.

Maybe.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Nitpicking is your thing. Not mine. Obama should be investigated. So does Bush.

Calling you out for your blatant lies isn't "nitpicking."

If you had a legitimate point, you wouldn't need to lie.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Then you are claiming to be intelligent now?

You are in a world of hurt.

Playing chess with you can be boring.

Because he won't let you do any double jumps?

LOL