Of course you can. I bet you call it the Gulf of Receptionist when you blow up your little raft and go swimming.
Hegseth issues an illegal order.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
You were suckered, sucker.
He was present at the classified briefing, were you, sucker?
Seperate branches of government…the Senate is in the Legislative Branch, the presidency is in the Executive Branch…co-equal powers, sucker.
Untrue, see above, there is a difference between the Department of the Interior doing something, and the President "wanna be king" simply signing an executive order.
yes the Europeans also gave the name Mexico
who gives a shit about any of this.
you can call the Sears Tower the Willis Tower for all I care.
Considered this is a gulf of a many countrys - Gulf of the Americas seems the most cromulent to me anyway
You can does what ever you chooses. But be careful if you us a new made labeled the Gulf of America you will probably get lost on your dual engine boat when one engine dies.
:
You were lied to and believe it. Lets see what some Republicans, not Retrumplicans say about this, those who are not threatened by TACO.
Like shooting ducks in a barrel.
I only care in that it illustrates how TACO tries to be a king.
Tbird19482
Verified User
FUCK YOU ASSHOLE.
You guys enjoying your circle jerk?
Who came first? Or did you do it at the same time?
yawn. You didn't care when Dementia Joe shut down speech as a way to be king though. so fuck off
It is fun fapping on you. No circle involved
Last edited:
Is it not called the Willis Tower?
Senator Tom Cotton defended the U.S. strikes on an alleged drug boat as "entirely lawful and needful," stating that the survivors were attempting to salvage their cargo and "stay in the fight"
.
Following a classified briefing with Navy Admiral Frank "Mitch" Bradley and other officials on December 4, 2025, Cotton, who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee, offered a starkly different interpretation of the video footage compared to his Democratic colleagues.
.
Following a classified briefing with Navy Admiral Frank "Mitch" Bradley and other officials on December 4, 2025, Cotton, who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee, offered a starkly different interpretation of the video footage compared to his Democratic colleagues.
- View of the survivors Cotton stated, "I saw two survivors trying to flip a boat loaded with drugs bound for the United States back over so they could stay in the fight". He suggested they were "narcoterrorists" and the strikes prevented them from recovering their cargo or getting aid from other nearby boats.
- Legality of the strikes He described the multiple strikes as "righteous" and exactly what he would expect military commanders to do. He also relayed that Admiral Bradley denied receiving any "kill them all" order from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, confirming the order was detailed and lawful.
- ** view on the incident** Cotton stated he "didn't see anything disturbing about it," emphasizing that the true concern is the number of Americans who have died from drugs smuggled into the country.
you shit stains with your king talk are so fucking stupid
we have miles of proof of Dementia Joe or who ever was in charge of that retards reign using the power of government to silence people.
Obama put more whistleblowers in jail than all other presidents combined
you had no problems with kings.
these are facts - so @Tbird19482 - you are a government whore. a useless tool for shit stains because you are too fucking dumb to actually be a shit stain
we have miles of proof of Dementia Joe or who ever was in charge of that retards reign using the power of government to silence people.
Obama put more whistleblowers in jail than all other presidents combined
you had no problems with kings.
these are facts - so @Tbird19482 - you are a government whore. a useless tool for shit stains because you are too fucking dumb to actually be a shit stain
not by those living near it
Senator Tom Cotton defended the U.S. strikes on an alleged drug boat as "entirely lawful and needful," stating that the survivors were attempting to salvage their cargo and "stay in the fight"
.
Following a classified briefing with Navy Admiral Frank "Mitch" Bradley and other officials on December 4, 2025, Cotton, who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee, offered a starkly different interpretation of the video footage compared to his Democratic colleagues.
- View of the survivors Cotton stated, "I saw two survivors trying to flip a boat loaded with drugs bound for the United States back over so they could stay in the fight". He suggested they were "narcoterrorists" and the strikes prevented them from recovering their cargo or getting aid from other nearby boats.
- Legality of the strikes He described the multiple strikes as "righteous" and exactly what he would expect military commanders to do. He also relayed that Admiral Bradley denied receiving any "kill them all" order from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, confirming the order was detailed and lawful.
- ** view on the incident** Cotton stated he "didn't see anything disturbing about it," emphasizing that the true concern is the number of Americans who have died from drugs smuggled into the country.
You have been suckered, sucker.
Prove that Sen. Cotton lied, sucker.
You were not there for the classified briefing…you were lost in the Gulf of America…with two engines.
Last edited:
So Gillian isn't safe?
Tbird19482
Verified User
YOU can go FUCK YOURSELF TOO ASSHOLE.