You Will Obey

I really don't see the big deal. It's the cities property, so they can determine what can be sold there. If the vendors do not agree, they can haul their machines off.
 
WinterBorn said:
What has already been addressed is that you want the gov't to dictate what privately owned businesses do. And yet dislike it when the gov't dictates what beverages are available on gov't property.

Not much in the way of fighting for freedom or fairness there.
Click to expand...
It's entirely consistent with his opinions on property rights, I.E. that they don't exist.
 
Caboose said:
So thus the city has a right to not allow soda and what not be sold on their property? Because every other post you've made in this thread has claimed otherwise.
Click to expand...
SF can do whatever it wants. I don't live there or pay taxes there.
 
Southern Man your Southern Woman hit on me. Just thought you should know. Perhaps you need to spice up your bedroom life. Let her give you a blowjob, if you don't, I will let Southern Woman give me one.
 
webbway said:
Coca-Cola is out, and soy milk is now part of San Francisco's official city policy.

Under an executive order from Mayor Gavin Newsom, Coke, Pepsi and Fanta Orange are no longer allowed in vending machines on city property, although their diet counterparts are - up to a point.

Newsom's directive, issued in April but whose practical impacts are starting to be felt now, bars calorically sweetened beverages from vending machines on city property.

That includes non-diet sodas, sports drinks and artificially sweetened water. Juice must be 100 percent fruit or vegetable juice with no added sweeteners. Diet sodas can be no more than 25 percent of the items offered, the directive says.

There should be "ample choices" of water, "soy milk, rice milk and other similar dairy or non dairy milk," says the directive, which also covers fat and sugar content in vending machine snacks. :barf:


http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/07/05/BAMU1E8QKR.DTL&tsp=1

Don't worry libtards, Kool-Aid will still be available.


View attachment 453
Click to expand...

So, the California libtards are now being ordered to Drink The Kool Aid.
 
usaloyal2theend said:
As an experiment, I decided to cut most easily identifiable sugars out of my diet (i.e., cookies, cakes, candy, icecream). I decided not to go too far overboard and as long as there wasn't more than 7 grams of sugar listed in the ingredients, I would forego them for a month. I also cut out breads, processed foods, and white pastas. I ate lots of lean meats (yes, red meat on occasion) chicken, eggs, and tons of green vegetables in unlimited quantities.

I am in good shape. I eat well and exercise. Coupled with my exercise workout and cutting these items out of my diet, I noticed a tangible difference in my energy, but more importantly in my toning.

I also noticed that once I subsituted white sugar with real sugars found in fruits and vegetables I hardly ever craved the occaisional cookie, piece of cake, brownie, or icecream scoop.

I still love all of these sweets, but I needed to train myself to appreciate other natural sweets and at first my body revolted. I also stopped drinking artificially sweetened sodas (Diet Coke, Diet Mt Dew).

Sugar is an insidious substance and addiction that slips in and grabs you by the throat. It can be found in so many things, including salt! Just cutting back on the known sugars and backing away dramatically from high levels of sugar in certain items made a marked difference in the way I felt and how I toned up with exercise.

I still keep it up and the payoff is feeling good and staying in shape. Once in a while I have the piece of cake, cookie, or scoop of icecream, but for the most part I have retrained myself to like the foods that are better for me and don't pack on the pounds.
Click to expand...

Salt is the same way.
The only things I put salt on, is home popped popcorn and home made frenchfries.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top