Life's little contradiction

Liberals, in the traditional sense of the word, are fine. It's the Progressive Left that are evil rotten assholes.
As opposed to the Moral Majority, or the Tea Party or the New Conservatives or MAGA or Libertarians? Last time I checked, Progressives aren't trying to erase the FDR New Deal, which essentially made life so much better for even brain dead Maga trolls like you.
 
don-draper-wait-what-meme-1068x601.jpg
He asked for NAMES of CURRENT people that fit the bill you subscribe to. If you can't, then STFU.
 
Rights are natural. That is they exist outside of government. They can and do exist whether government exists or not. If Rights are bestowed by government, then government can take them away.
The late, great comedian and social commentator George Carlin laid to rest decades ago the BS you just parroted.


www.google.com/search?sca_esv=c9e3226669c932ab&cs=0&q=George+Carlin+Rights+and+Privileges+YouTube&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjQsZHhzKCRAxUjFlkFHclRA-IQpboHKAB6BAgDEAI&biw=1592&bih=774&dpr=1#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:7b55e82b,vid:C_FQZUSy1Vg,st:0
 
Last edited:
Relying on AI is like relying on a sophomore in high school to do your college homework...
Yet YOU CANNOT LOGICALLY OR FACTUALLY REFUTE ONE ITEM.

That's the problem with you dumb ass yet proud MAGATS. You make all types of statements, yet when properly challenged, you can't defend your stance so you blow smoke.
 
A classical liberal is someone who advocates for private property, economic freedom, the rule of law, free trade, and a republican style of government that protects free speech and freedom of association.


It is a belief that Rights come a natural source and are not something given to people by government. Classical liberalism believes everyone is entitled equal opportunity but not equal outcomes, particularly not ones where government force is used to produce them.

The Left on the other hand, believes that Rights come from government and that government force should be used to produce equal outcomes.
Libertarians have and always will be a fucking joke! They have NO problem with segregation so long as it's on "private property" ... meaning that you can own a diner in town that serves "the public", yet you can discriminate against patrons for whatever reason you choose (race, creed, color, etc.) because you own the property the diner sits upon.

:cautious: GMAFB!
 
Last edited:
Libertarians have and always will be a fucking joke! They have NO problem with segregation so long as it's on "private property" ... meaning that you can a diner in town that serves "the public", yet you can discriminate against patrons for whatever reason you choose (race, creed, color, etc.) because you own the property the diner sits upon.

:cautious: GMAFB!
Classical liberals made slavery legal in the Constitution.
 
Classical liberals made slavery legal in the Constitution.

Give us all a comprehensive definitions in your own words what a "leftists" is and how does that pertain to the OP? Over the years, ALL your posts are couched in the "I despise leftist" attitude.

And, Progressive Leftists gave us Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Hitler, Mussolini, Mugabe, Castro, Che Guevara, Pol Pot, the Kim Jong family, Maduro...

So, which is worse? Classical liberals accepting slavery that already existed in a time when slavery was common as a compromise to create one of the freest and more equal nations on Earth, or being a willing part of a political body that has caused more war, pestilence, death, suffering, hatred, racism, and every other woe placed on man than any other in all of history, including lots of slavery-in-kind?

To call yourself a Progressive Leftist is to admit you want and accept one of the greatest evils to ever exist. Is that 'definition' enough?
 
Back
Top