Who gets into heaven

It fits with the dichotomic nature of the universe. On one side is light and goodness, on the other is darkness and evilness.

IMO, it's a choice people make.
I agree with your concept of free will.
Even if religion is a total delusion, there seems to be a strong statistical correlation between people who are actively religious and happiness.

Christopher Hitchens, Donald Trump, and Richard Dawkins never seemed particularly happy to me.

Religion’s Relationship to Happiness, Civic Engagement and Health Around the World​

In the U.S. and other countries, participation in a congregation is a key factor​

People who are active in religious congregations tend to be happier and more civically engaged than either religiously unaffiliated adults or inactive members of religious groups, according to a new Pew Research Center analysis of survey data from the United States and more than two dozen other countries.​
Religiously active people also tend to smoke and drink less, but they are not healthier in terms of exercise frequency and rates of obesity. Nor, in most countries, are highly religious people more likely to rate themselves as being in very good overall health – though the U.S. is among the possible exceptions.​
Many previous studies have found positive associations between religion and health in the United States. Researchers have shown, for example, that Americans who regularly attend religious services tend to live longer.1 Other studies have focused on narrower health benefits, such as how religion may help breast cancer patients cope with stress. On the other hand, there are also studies that have not found a robust relationship between religion and better health in the U.S., and even some studies that have shown negative relationships, such as higher rates of obesity among highly religious Americans.​
 
I agree with your concept of free will.
Even if religion is a total delusion, there seems to be a strong statistical correlation between people who are actively religious and happiness.

Christopher Hitchens, Donald Trump, and Richard Dawkins never seemed particularly happy to me.

Religion’s Relationship to Happiness, Civic Engagement and Health Around the World​

In the U.S. and other countries, participation in a congregation is a key factor​

People who are active in religious congregations tend to be happier and more civically engaged than either religiously unaffiliated adults or inactive members of religious groups, according to a new Pew Research Center analysis of survey data from the United States and more than two dozen other countries.​
Religiously active people also tend to smoke and drink less, but they are not healthier in terms of exercise frequency and rates of obesity. Nor, in most countries, are highly religious people more likely to rate themselves as being in very good overall health – though the U.S. is among the possible exceptions.​
Many previous studies have found positive associations between religion and health in the United States. Researchers have shown, for example, that Americans who regularly attend religious services tend to live longer.1 Other studies have focused on narrower health benefits, such as how religion may help breast cancer patients cope with stress. On the other hand, there are also studies that have not found a robust relationship between religion and better health in the U.S., and even some studies that have shown negative relationships, such as higher rates of obesity among highly religious Americans.​
I've never seen a happy atheist.....but that's probably due to the fact happy atheists aren't online bitching and whining at others.

Although the numbers are close, they are consistent. The stats about being active in other, secular groups was interesting too:

In the U.S., 58% of actively religious adults say they are also active in at least one other (nonreligious) kind of voluntary organization, including charity groups, sports clubs or labor unions. Only about half of all inactively religious adults (51%) and fewer than half of the unaffiliated (39%) say the same.
 
I've never seen a happy atheist.....but that's probably due to the fact happy atheists aren't online bitching and whining at others.

Although the numbers are close, they are consistent. The stats about being active in other, secular groups was interesting too:

In the U.S., 58% of actively religious adults say they are also active in at least one other (nonreligious) kind of voluntary organization, including charity groups, sports clubs or labor unions. Only about half of all inactively religious adults (51%) and fewer than half of the unaffiliated (39%) say the same.

Out of the eight or nine Protestant denominational services I've attended, you are consistently going to get an earful about service to the community and service to other people. So while there are shitty fake Christians, like the ones on JPP, people who genuinely want to be a witness for Christ already tend to at least have belief in a service-oriented ethos. That doesn't mean irreligious people aren't community and service oriented, but your stats seem to suggest the religious ethos of service extends beyond the church
 
Out of the eight or nine Protestant denominational services I've attended, you are consistently going to get an earful about service to the community and service to other people. So while there are shitty fake Christians, like the ones on JPP, people who genuinely want to be a witness for Christ already tend to at least have belief in a service-oriented ethos. That doesn't mean irreligious people aren't community and service oriented, but your stats seem to suggest the religious ethos of service extends beyond the church
It's interesting to me to see the traits are both cross-cultural and cross-religion. Taiwan, for example, is mainly Buddhist and Daoist.

SR_24.07.29_taiwan-religious-diversity_1.png
 
Taiwan must be the Bible belt of East Asia, lol
LOL

As your Pew Research link touched upon, it's not clear if it's religious/spiritual beliefs that make people happier or if happy people tend to be more religious/spiritual. Probably a little of both. :)


The exact nature of the connections between religious participation, happiness, civic engagement and health remains unclear and needs further study. While the data presented in this report indicate that there are links between religious activity and certain measures of well-being in many countries, the numbers do not prove that going to religious services is directly responsible for improving people’s lives. Rather, it could be that certain kinds of people tend to be active in multiple types of activities (secular as well as religious), many of which may provide physical or psychological benefits. Moreover, such people may be more active partly because they are happier and healthier, rather than the other way around. (For more information about what may be causing these links, see this sidebar.)
 
The question that I always had about the conventional concepts of Heaven is this:

Suppose someone who accesses Heaven on merit
cannot be happy
unless someone who doesn't merit access is there as well?
 
Denomination% Who believe non-Christian religions can lead to heaven/salvation
Catholics61%
Mainline Protestants56%
Historically black churches40%
Evangelicals23%



Which Heaven?
 
LOL

As your Pew Research link touched upon, it's not clear if it's religious/spiritual beliefs that make people happier or if happy people tend to be more religious/spiritual. Probably a little of both. :)


The exact nature of the connections between religious participation, happiness, civic engagement and health remains unclear and needs further study. While the data presented in this report indicate that there are links between religious activity and certain measures of well-being in many countries, the numbers do not prove that going to religious services is directly responsible for improving people’s lives. Rather, it could be that certain kinds of people tend to be active in multiple types of activities (secular as well as religious), many of which may provide physical or psychological benefits. Moreover, such people may be more active partly because they are happier and healthier, rather than the other way around. (For more information about what may be causing these links, see this sidebar.)
Statistics can rarely prove anything. Good point.

Being involved in community undoubtedly makes one feel their life is more fulfilled. Whether that means being involved in church, school boards, service organizations.

There has been some recognition among atheists of the importance of these kind of social models, and they started using the model of the Christian church to create their own atheist churches - where they listen to sermons by Richard Dawkins, sing Billy Joel songs, or whatever.
 
The question that I always had about the conventional concepts of Heaven is this:

Suppose someone who accesses Heaven on merit
cannot be happy
unless someone who doesn't merit access is there as well?
Conventional concepts of heaven are archaic. They were conceived by relatively unsophisticated people seeking to understand something larger and more complex than the Universe itself.

As such it's like two dimensional beings such as in "Flatland" trying imagine the third dimension. Or, in our case, three dimensional beings trying to imagine the fourth dimension. At best we can conjecture a fuzzy picture of transcendence, but our mortal minds can't handle more than that.

In short, once free of our bodies, how can we have emotions like happiness or sadness?


flatland-ft.jpg


flatlandia_anim.gif
 
Statistics can rarely prove anything. Good point.

Being involved in community undoubtedly makes one feel their life is more fulfilled. Whether that means being involved in church, school boards, service organizations.

There has been some recognition among atheists of the importance of these kind of social models, and they started using the model of the Christian church to create their own atheist churches - where they listen to sermons by Richard Dawkins, sing Billy Joel songs, or whatever.
As this and other threads have proved, atheists run in as large a gamut of beliefs as Protestants in America.
 
Well, to be fair, most people get mildly ill and have a horrible reaction when you walk in a room anyway. It starts with the smell and then you open your mouth.
^^^
Poor, poor widdle twoll. Sad.

Sadder that you lied about having me on ignore, but you're well known to be a liar, son.
 
Conventional concepts of heaven are archaic. They were conceived by relatively unsophisticated people seeking to understand something larger and more complex than the Universe itself.

As such it's like two dimensional beings such as in "Flatland" trying imagine the third dimension. Or, in our case, three dimensional beings trying to imagine the fourth dimension. At best we can conjecture a fuzzy picture of transcendence, but our mortal minds can't handle more than that.

In short, once free of our bodies, how can we have emotions like happiness or sadness?
By the same token, if it doesn't involve happiness, why would we want it?
As you allude, it's been often opined in these discussions that human feelings and emotions transcend our physical constitutions.

Absent the availability of perfect happiness as we can try to imagine it,
what can possibly be better that the perfect peace
that comes with cessation of existence as a living organism with consciousness?

To me, with the apparent and unexplained thought process to which I have access now,
an immortal soul would seem to be a frightening liability and affliction
bringing the possibility of eternal absence of happiness.

In fact, the Catholic church defines hell not as fire and brimstone but simply the absence of God.
I can loosely equate that with the absence of happiness.

Perhaps that's why I may be prejudiced against believing in the immortal soul.
 
Back
Top