New Report Shows Marijuana Arrests Unfairly Target Blacks

Topspin

Verified User
New Report Shows Marijuana Arrests Unfairly Target Blacks
by Mike Meno

On the same day that the California NAACP endorsed that state’s ballot initiative to end marijuana prohibition (now officially named Proposition 19), our allies at the Drug Policy Alliance released a new study that shines a light on the systemic racial bias behind marijuana arrests taking place all across California.

Among the report’s findings:

“In every one of the 25 largest counties in California, blacks are arrested for marijuana possession at higher rates than whites, typically at double, triple or even quadruple the rate of whites,” even though “U.S. government studies consistently find that young blacks use marijuana at lower rates than young whites.”
“In Los Angeles County, with nearly ten million residents and over a quarter of California’s population, blacks are arrested at over triple the rate of whites. Blacks are less than 10 percent of L.A. County’s population, but they are 30 percent of the people arrested for marijuana possession.”
“Police in other California counties, even those with relatively few blacks or relatively low rates of marijuana arrests, still arrest blacks at much higher rates than whites. African Americans are arrested for marijuana possession at nearly three times the rate of whites in Solano County, and at three to four times the rate of whites in Sonoma, Santa Cruz, and San Francisco counties.”
The report, written by Prof. Harry Levine of Queens College, finds this overwhelming racial bias to be a “system-wide phenomenon” and not just the result of a handful of racist cops. That’s because most narcotics officers are assigned to patrol so-called “high-crime” neighborhoods that are disproportionately low-income and minority. In those neighborhoods—as in nearly all neighborhoods—the most likely, or easiest arrest an officer can make is for marijuana possession. If we want to end this racial bias, we need to end the laws that allow it to occur. Come November, California voters will have an opportunity to do just that.
 
Prop 19 might be the economic and personal freedom game changer that locks up 12 for Obama.
LOL. No it won't. The Federal law won't be changed and it is solely in CA. It might "lock" another victory for Arnold, if he was running.
 
that study doesn't show shit...it doesn't show any unfairness, numbers alone do not make something unfair, further, i want the specific situation surrounding their arrest before i leap to conclusions like our resident racist poopspin
 
that study doesn't show shit...it doesn't show any unfairness, numbers alone do not make something unfair, further, i want the specific situation surrounding their arrest before i leap to conclusions like our resident racist poopspin


Now there's a shocker.
 
LOL. No it won't. The Federal law won't be changed and it is solely in CA. It might "lock" another victory for Arnold, if he was running.

If approved Prop 19 will spread like wildfire, other states are much more whimpy around freedom. But many states follow the fine leadership shown by Cali including colorado.
 
If approved Prop 19 will spread like wildfire, other states are much more whimpy around freedom. But many states follow the fine leadership shown by Cali including colorado.
We had our Prop earlier, it was defeated by a significant percentage in CO. I was actually shocked.
 
New Report Shows Marijuana Arrests Unfairly Target Blacks
by Mike Meno

On the same day that the California NAACP endorsed that state’s ballot initiative to end marijuana prohibition (now officially named Proposition 19), our allies at the Drug Policy Alliance released a new study that shines a light on the systemic racial bias behind marijuana arrests taking place all across California.

Among the report’s findings:

“In every one of the 25 largest counties in California, blacks are arrested for marijuana possession at higher rates than whites, typically at double, triple or even quadruple the rate of whites,” even though “U.S. government studies consistently find that young blacks use marijuana at lower rates than young whites.”
“In Los Angeles County, with nearly ten million residents and over a quarter of California’s population, blacks are arrested at over triple the rate of whites. Blacks are less than 10 percent of L.A. County’s population, but they are 30 percent of the people arrested for marijuana possession.”
“Police in other California counties, even those with relatively few blacks or relatively low rates of marijuana arrests, still arrest blacks at much higher rates than whites. African Americans are arrested for marijuana possession at nearly three times the rate of whites in Solano County, and at three to four times the rate of whites in Sonoma, Santa Cruz, and San Francisco counties.”
The report, written by Prof. Harry Levine of Queens College, finds this overwhelming racial bias to be a “system-wide phenomenon” and not just the result of a handful of racist cops. That’s because most narcotics officers are assigned to patrol so-called “high-crime” neighborhoods that are disproportionately low-income and minority. In those neighborhoods—as in nearly all neighborhoods—the most likely, or easiest arrest an officer can make is for marijuana possession. If we want to end this racial bias, we need to end the laws that allow it to occur. Come November, California voters will have an opportunity to do just that.

This isn't new news. This has been known for decades.

They could even things out by piss testing white politicians and their families, & police officers and their families. Then throw the book at them. That sounds like the fair thing to do.
 
New Report Shows Marijuana Arrests Unfairly Target Blacks
by Mike Meno

On the same day that the California NAACP endorsed that state’s ballot initiative to end marijuana prohibition (now officially named Proposition 19), our allies at the Drug Policy Alliance released a new study that shines a light on the systemic racial bias behind marijuana arrests taking place all across California.

Among the report’s findings:

“In every one of the 25 largest counties in California, blacks are arrested for marijuana possession at higher rates than whites, typically at double, triple or even quadruple the rate of whites,” even though “U.S. government studies consistently find that young blacks use marijuana at lower rates than young whites.”
“In Los Angeles County, with nearly ten million residents and over a quarter of California’s population, blacks are arrested at over triple the rate of whites. Blacks are less than 10 percent of L.A. County’s population, but they are 30 percent of the people arrested for marijuana possession.”
“Police in other California counties, even those with relatively few blacks or relatively low rates of marijuana arrests, still arrest blacks at much higher rates than whites. African Americans are arrested for marijuana possession at nearly three times the rate of whites in Solano County, and at three to four times the rate of whites in Sonoma, Santa Cruz, and San Francisco counties.”
The report, written by Prof. Harry Levine of Queens College, finds this overwhelming racial bias to be a “system-wide phenomenon” and not just the result of a handful of racist cops. That’s because most narcotics officers are assigned to patrol so-called “high-crime” neighborhoods that are disproportionately low-income and minority. In those neighborhoods—as in nearly all neighborhoods—the most likely, or easiest arrest an officer can make is for marijuana possession. If we want to end this racial bias, we need to end the laws that allow it to occur. Come November, California voters will have an opportunity to do just that.

In other news.... a new study has found that we pay for way too many studies whose results always leave you with that 'no shit... why did we waste money on this study' feeling.
 
no surprise you have nothing of value to add

this particular study doesn't show anything and you know it


Actually, the study shows plenty and you know it. Whether you agree with the conclusion the authors reach based on the data presented is up to you.

I'd love to hear your alternative theories for the huge racial disparities in marijuana arrests.
 
Actually, the study shows plenty and you know it. Whether you agree with the conclusion the authors reach based on the data presented is up to you.

I'd love to hear your alternative theories for the huge racial disparities in marijuana arrests.

i don't have to even give you an alternate theory, i'll give you the theory from the report itself....and if you and the authors had actually understood this sentence, you wouldn't come to the bogus conclusion

That’s because most narcotics officers are assigned to patrol so-called “high-crime” neighborhoods that are disproportionately low-income and minority.
 
i don't have to even give you an alternate theory, i'll give you the theory from the report itself....and if you and the authors had actually understood this sentence, you wouldn't come to the bogus conclusion

fyi.... just because they patrol more 'high crime' areas, does not mean they have to ARREST the lower income/minorities for MJ possession at higher rates.
 
i don't have to even give you an alternate theory, i'll give you the theory from the report itself....and if you and the authors had actually understood this sentence, you wouldn't come to the bogus conclusion


I forgot about your lack of reading comprehension skills. Nevermind.

Can someone draw a picture for Yurt so he can have a chance at understanding how targeting minority neighborhoods for narcotics enforcement constitutes systemic racial bias?
 
fyi.... just because they patrol more 'high crime' areas, does not mean they have to ARREST the lower income/minorities for MJ possession at higher rates.

it doesn't prove racial bias just because they do...are we now going to have pity parties for movie stars who have been getting arrested for DUI's?
 
I forgot about your lack of reading comprehension skills. Nevermind.

Can someone draw a picture for Yurt so he can have a chance at understanding how targeting minority neighborhoods for narcotics enforcement constitutes systemic racial bias?

they target HIGH CRIME areas you dishonest hack....apparently YOU can't read...it is not the officers' fault that the neighborhoods happen to be disproportionatly low income and minority
 
Back
Top