To keep them from getting in trouble?
AI Overview
+4
Yes, military members have a duty to refuse unlawful orders and can get in trouble for failing to do so. Refusing an illegal order is not a punishable offense; in fact, following one can lead to criminal liability for the service member.
Perfect example of how slapping AI on a moron still leaves you with a moron.
The military literally drills every single troop, year after year, with crystal-clear examples of unlawful orders they are REQUIRED to refuse: 'Round up the civilians and shoot them,' 'Execute the prisoners,' 'Torture this guy for intel,' etc. They hammer it home because split-second obedience is life-or-death on a battlefield, but war crimes are never excused with 'I was just following orders.” Every private knows that on day one.
These sleazy politicians and former military know that too. Yet they deliberately put out statements telling troops to start deciding which orders are “unlawful” based on their personal orange-man-bad feelings. That’s textbook sedition, straight out of the playbook, and they damn well know it.
Why do it? Because they’re broken, deranged, end-stage TDS patients. Baldy up there especially can’t cope with the fact Trump keeps living rent-free in his empty skull and curb-stomps him every time. It was hilarious, right up until these unhinged psychos decided to play games with military chain-of-command.
FAFO time. Charge every last one of them, let the courts sort it out. You mentally ill radicals are officially too dangerous to just laugh off anymore.