Midterm election results question

evince said:
He will be in a mental hospital or dead of a heart attack before then
Click to expand...
Who knows if he will be impeached again?. maybe none. Trump can't run again. He will likely not have the House, and perhaps the Senate either. It is hard to wait it out until he is through because he cannot be trusted to leave.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
If the Democrats impeach but fail to convict him two more times, let's say, after the mid-terms what does that prove?

To me, it screams the Democrats are fucking insane. They're doing the same thing over and over when they clearly aren't going to get a conviction. If anything, they're making the practice of impeachment both a laughingstock of a joke and wasting the nation's time doing something that is idiotic.
Click to expand...
Look, you are entitled to your opinions no matter how dumb they are but being Impeached is its own function and it is serious and stain on a Presidency and Trump was impeached, TWICE.

But you are the guy who holds the opinion that you would not care if you got a felony finding against you making you a felon as long as you got zero fine. You think ONLY the fine matters and the felony is nothing, as you say with regards to Trumps felony in the Letisha James case. So there is no helping your level of stupid opinions.
 
QP! said:
Look, you are entitled to your opinions no matter how dumb they are but being Impeached is its own function and it is serious and stain on a Presidency and Trump was impeached, TWICE.

But you are the guy who holds the opinion that you would not care if you got a felony finding against you making you a felon as long as you got zero fine. You think ONLY the fine matters and the felony is nothing, as you say with regards to Trumps felony in the Letisha James case. So there is no helping your level of stupid opinions.
Click to expand...
When you try to do it again and again, only to fail, it makes the process irrelevant. It doesn't strengthen the institution, it makes a laughingstock out of it.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
When you try to do it again and again, only to fail, it makes the process irrelevant. It doesn't strengthen the institution, it makes a laughingstock out of it.
Click to expand...

Sure it makes a laughingstock of the process, but more specific...it continues to make a laughingstock of the dems who keep trying
to take Trump down, be it via the impeachment or the deep state partisan lawfare route.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
When you try to do it again and again, only to fail, it makes the process irrelevant. It doesn't strengthen the institution, it makes a laughingstock out of it.
Click to expand...
Again you are stuck on stupid.

The process DID NOT fail.

The House voted on Indicted Trump and that vote succeeded. Trump was indicted.

You can say setting out to do something and achieving it is a failure but no one would agree with you who is not stupid.

That the Senate on a separate and other part of the process did not succeed only impacts that part.

This is like you insisting that Trump Felony finding and being a felon does not matter and you would be fine being a felon because he did not get the fine and you claimed the 'fine is the important part'. You say these things as you are stupid and no other person would agree.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
When you try to do it again and again, only to fail, it makes the process irrelevant. It doesn't strengthen the institution, it makes a laughingstock out of it.
Click to expand...
This begins with T. A. being simply wrong. An impeachment is a terrible stain on any president.

Your comments make you a laughingstock.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
If, somehow, the Democrats regain control of Congress in the mid-terms, how many times will they unsuccessfully impeach Trump? Just curious...
Click to expand...
On a scale of 1 to 10 - how terrified is TA of another Democrat sweep of the midterms and 2028 presidential - just like last time?

I'm going to say 12!

When are you going to admit what a shit show trumpism has been?
 
Jake Starkey said:
This begins with T. A. being simply wrong. An impeachment is a terrible stain on any president.

Your comments make you a laughingstock.
Click to expand...
The trumptard position will always be - "lawfare" when it comes to trump. Of course "lawfare" is when the president orders his DOJ to "investigate" all his political enemies - they think that's "justice".

When it all becomes "Democrat bad no matter what" there is no reasoning with someone like that.
 
My bet is LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) gets impeached and convicted before Trump does. She's going to trial in federal court for attacking ICE officers at a facility in NJ. Remember her?

Her defense of being engaged in "...oversight responsibilities and congressional duties..." has been tossed opening the way to a trial for criminal charges related to her assault on federal law enforcement officers.

OIP.DII82y2B2uNXqOjI-oO2lQHaNW
 
T. A. Gardner said:
My bet is LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) gets impeached and convicted before Trump does. She's going to trial in federal court for attacking ICE officers at a facility in NJ. Remember her?

Her defense of being engaged in "...oversight responsibilities and congressional duties..." has been tossed opening the way to a trial for criminal charges related to her assault on federal law enforcement officers.

OIP.DII82y2B2uNXqOjI-oO2lQHaNW
Click to expand...

Yet Trump tried to overthrow the government. Amazing.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
A "successful impeachment" removes the impeached person from office. A failure is when the impeached person remains in office. The Democrats failed to impeach Trump twice.
Click to expand...
Why are you having such trouble understanding the definition of impeachment? It means charge or accusation, not removal.

Search Assist

Impeachment is the process by which a government official, such as the President, is charged with misconduct or a crime by a legislative body, typically leading to a trial and potential removal from office. In the United States, this process begins in the House of Representatives and, if successful, moves to the Senate for a trial. Merriam-Webster Wikipedia
 
christiefan915 said:
Why are you having such trouble understanding the definition of impeachment? It means charge or accusation, not removal.

Search Assist

Impeachment is the process by which a government official, such as the President, is charged with misconduct or a crime by a legislative body, typically leading to a trial and potential removal from office. In the United States, this process begins in the House of Representatives and, if successful, moves to the Senate for a trial. Merriam-Webster Wikipedia
Click to expand...
Obviously, they didn't get him.

:magagrin:
 
T. A. Gardner said:
If the Democrats impeach but fail to convict him two more times, let's say, after the mid-terms what does that prove?

To me, it screams the Democrats are fucking insane. They're doing the same thing over and over when they clearly aren't going to get a conviction. If anything, they're making the practice of impeachment both a laughingstock of a joke and wasting the nation's time doing something that is idiotic.
Click to expand...

When a President violates his oath repeatedly and he is not removed from office it says something about the partisanship of those that ignore the evidence and vote to keep him in office.
 
christiefan915 said:
Why are you having such trouble understanding the definition of impeachment? It means charge or accusation, not removal.

Search Assist

Impeachment is the process by which a government official, such as the President, is charged with misconduct or a crime by a legislative body, typically leading to a trial and potential removal from office. In the United States, this process begins in the House of Representatives and, if successful, moves to the Senate for a trial. Merriam-Webster Wikipedia
Click to expand...
I think with TA it's all about the trolling. He knows trump's filthy-dirty - but he's willing to tolerate that because his hatred for anything Democrat prevents him from thinking clearly.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
When a President violates his oath repeatedly and he is not removed from office it says something about the partisanship of those that ignore the evidence and vote to keep him in office.
Click to expand...
Precisely - Mike Johnson, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, Tom Holman - when trump's gone and they're powerless who will welcome those scumbags into their community.

It's why trump moved his residence from NYC - where he's rather be - he's just NOT welcome there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top