He was embarrassed because he knew the vote was going to be a landslide against him.
So why is he mad at MTG now?
She outlived her usefulness.
He was embarrassed because he knew the vote was going to be a landslide against him.
So why is he mad at MTG now?
I know it is ok to use AI. I wouldn't be ashamed if I had. However I do well writing. It is a large portion of my job. I wrote this like I write emails going to a larger group of people. Using bullet points and paragraphs, which reaches a larger group of people as some will not read the "wall of text" and want the bullet points, others want it to be more writing less bullet point...It’s OK to use AI, but check the bias. In fact might be a good idea to tell it not to give you answers slanted towards what it thinks about you.
Ok.. but check the AI bias when you do use it.I know it is ok to use AI. I wouldn't be ashamed if I had. However I do well writing. It is a large portion of my job. I wrote this like I write emails going to a larger group of people. Using bullet points and paragraphs, which reaches a larger group of people as some will not read the "wall of text" and want the bullet points, others want it to be more writing less bullet point...
Anyway. When managing information within a larger group of people you write differently, usually this way.
I get that you do not like what I wrote, and you want it to be AI. Maybe because you do not do as well, I do not know.
Sure. I'll "check" the bias when I use it, papa Jarod...Ok.. but check the AI bias when you do use it.
Just advice for the public, your post clearly exaggerated the limits of presidential power. There might be a very few pieces of the files TACO could not legally release right away.Sure. I'll "check" the bias when I use it, papa Jarod...![]()
My God, you have a full half dozen OP's on this topic on the front page of this forum alone.Just advice for the public, your post clearly exaggerated the limits of presidential power. There might be a very few pieces of the files TACO could not legally release right away.
We also know he has had his name redacted from the files.
Is it not true?My God, you have a full half dozen OP's on this topic on the front page of this forum alone.
Sounds to me like you are couching all your sturm and drang over the Epstein case by claiming, if this turns out to be a nothingburger, it's because Trump personally had his name removed from everything?
Try to make it through one day by focusing on your phone bank calls instead of letting Trump dominate your life.
Exactly, also they respond with something completely off topic.That is, in fact, how the dumber alt right think when they don't understand.
We know nothing of the sort. Maybe you should follow your own advice and check AI for your own bias before posting stuff... you know telling someone who doesn’t hide some bias of his own to "check" AI for bias... then saying this BS. Geebus.Just advice for the public, your post clearly exaggerated the limits of presidential power. There might be a very few pieces of the files TACO could not legally release right away.
We also know he has had his name redacted from the files.
we literally come here to post our own opinions, then when you find out something "leans" toward my opinion you blame AI. weaksauce.It’s OK to use AI, but check the bias. In fact might be a good idea to tell it not to give you answers slanted towards what it thinks about you.
It’s designed to use confirmation bias, to make you feel good using it.
Fucking dumbassThe Justice Department can release those files anytime TACO tells them to…. Remember, he is their boss!
So why does Congress have to vote to force them?
He’s still trying to avoid it, they will never get out.
Fucking dumbassThe Justice Department can release those files anytime TACO tells them to…. Remember, he is their boss!
So why does Congress have to vote to force them?
He’s still trying to avoid it, they will never get out.
We know nothing of the sort. Maybe you should follow your own advice and check AI for your own bias before posting stuff... you know telling someone who doesn’t hide some bias of his own to "check" AI for bias... then saying this BS. Geebus.
Its not about your own bias, it's about not telling the truth about facts.we literally come here to post our own opinions, then when you find out something "leans" toward my opinion you blame AI. weaksauce.
Why is the measure necessary? He has that power himself without being ordered by Congress to do it.Fucking dumbass
![]()
Trump Calls on House GOP to Approve Discharge Petition Compelling DOJ to Release Epstein Files
President Trump has called on House Republicans to approve a measure compelling the Justice Department to release the Epstein files. Trump’s reversal late Sunday came after he unsuccessfully lobbied Republican Congresswomen Lauren Boebert and Nancy Mace to remove their names from a discharge...www.democracynow.org
What we know, is that some emails were released just days ago that had his name, you were all getting hyperexcited about how Epstein called Trump a bad guy, as if he is some awesome judge of character... someone that traffics in human flesh saying that someone else is a "bad guy"... <SMH>"The FBI Redacted Trump’s Name in the Epstein Files
The bureau’s FOIA team tasked with conducting a final review of the records blacked out the names before higher-ups said last month that releasing the documents ‘would not be appropriate or warranted.’" - https://www.bloomberg.com/news/news...in-files-trump-s-name-was-redacted-by-the-fbi
You posted that there were no files.Exactly, also they respond with something completely off topic.
The name was not redacted because that information did not come from the redacted FBI files. You are confusing two different sources of information. I am not hyperexcited, but I am happy bad people are outed. Even when they are Democrats.What we know, is that some emails were released just days ago that had his name, you were all getting hyperexcited about how Epstein called Trump a bad guy...
So, this story is really already been proven false. Because actual information that was leaked recently... well, it contained that name you say was "redacted"...
Again, you should check that AI bias before you get them to find crap for you. It's way too easy to prove the story false.