Can a Lib name one?

Lionfish said:
If you were a tiny bit smarter, you would have remembered things like the democrat manufactured Pee Pee tapes and Russian hookers, the Mueller hoax, and all the other attempts the democrat party tried to do to keep Trump from running or derail his campaign. Your side has filed hundreds of frivolous lawsuits, created shit out of thin air, and you have the gall to use the words 'cold case'?
Blow it out your ass.
Click to expand...
Be less stupid LyingFish as Biden's DoJ never investigate the pee tape either.

The Russian collusion between the Trump Campaign and Trump was absolutely PROVEN by the Rubio led Senate committee and the Mueller investigation both but because Trump lies and calls it a hoax, you are so stupid, you do so also.
 
I want an honest conservative to explain to me why we aren't agreeing to a full release of all sealed or previously withheld info

so tired of the sides playing each other nonsense.

shine the light, and let the chips fall
 
Maze said:
the-road-not-taken-v0-175wqc1h3v0g1.png
Click to expand...

The above is what I originally was responding to, stating it is a false dilemma.
QP! said:
i told you before that you are too stupid to try and use fallacies and you have a track record of getting them 100% wrong, when you try.

There is no 'false dilemma' in what he said.
Click to expand...
That picture offers a false dilemma.

False-dilema.jpg


First, there is no conclusive evidence at the moment that Trump is "a pedophile." It is all supposition and baseless claims. Then the other choice given is "Admit you were conned."

There are plenty of alternatives to both options other than what is presented in that picture. That means that the picture presents a false dilemma. It doesn't matter in this case, what I hold as an opinion on the issue the picture clearly is about. I really don't care one way or the other. Thus, even my own position on this matter shows that the picture is presenting a false dilemma.

Thus, it is you that is too stupid to bother to learn what a false dilemma is. So, in addition, it is your track record that is the one riddled with failures here.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
The above is what I originally was responding to, stating it is a false dilemma.

That picture offers a false dilemma.

False-dilema.jpg


First, there is no conclusive evidence at the moment that Trump is "a pedophile." It is all supposition and baseless claims. Then the other choice given is "Admit you were conned."

There are plenty of alternatives to both options other than what is presented in that picture. That means that the picture presents a false dilemma. It doesn't matter in this case, what I hold as an opinion on the issue the picture clearly is about. I really don't care one way or the other. Thus, even my own position on this matter shows that the picture is presenting a false dilemma.

Thus, it is you that is too stupid to bother to learn what a false dilemma is. So, in addition, it is your track record that is the one riddled with failures here.
Click to expand...
Terry, Trump himself has posed the type of question and answered it that you see in the visual.

Switch the pedophile box with him instead 'shooting someone on the street', and you will understand what Trump was saying and how he acknowledged his supporters would choose.

So just as Trump KNOWS his base and can pose that scenario and answer it, those boxes can can be interchanged and just as Trump does not have to had shot any YET, we all know this is a fair dilemma to pose to them.

If you wanted to say it was wrong the proper way would be to say 'we know how magats would chose and they would support the 'murderer Trump' or 'Pedophile Trump', should he do those acts. You could say there would be no dilemma as they would stick with Trump either way.
 
The below is absolutely an appropriate satirization of the dilemma Trump puts his supporters to.

It DOES NOT matter that Trump has never murdered any one yet as Trump himself has said and knows.


ac246t.jpg


160125114628-donald-trump-quote-shoot-somebody.jpg


If you see the above satirization of the road fork choice, as @T. A. Gardner did and your reply is 'but Trump has never shot anyone so its a false dilemma' the reason you think that is because you are stupid.

Trump himself notes this is a position he could put his supporters in and he believes they would all choose the fork to continue supporting him.
 
Last edited:
zymurgy said:
I want an honest conservative to explain to me why we aren't agreeing to a full release of all sealed or previously withheld info

so tired of the sides playing each other nonsense.

shine the light, and let the chips fall
Click to expand...
Agreed. Let the shit hit the fan. I suggest the dems may regret what they wished for.
 
QP! said:
Be less stupid LyingFish as Biden's DoJ never investigate the pee tape either.
Click to expand...
Who said Brandon did?
QP! said:
The Russian collusion between the Trump Campaign and Trump was absolutely PROVEN by the Rubio led Senate committee and the Mueller investigation both but because Trump lies and calls it a hoax, you are so stupid, you do so also.
Click to expand...
Russia hoax was all on Hillary Clinton.

Get smarter.
 
Lionfish said:
Who said Brandon did?

Russia hoax was all on Hillary Clinton.

Get smarter.
Click to expand...
i am smarter.

I would tell you to read but we know that is beyond your intelligence level.

Report of the Select Committee on Intelligence United States Senate on Russian Active Measures Campaigns and Interference in the 2016 U.S. Election​


AI Summary:
The bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee's final 2020 report on Russian interference concluded that the Trump campaign's interactions with Russian intelligence officials were a "grave counterintelligence threat" and detailed extensive contacts, finding that some campaign members were willing to accept Russia's help.
Key findings regarding contact between Russian agents and the Trump campaign include:
  • Paul Manafort and Konstantin Kilimnik: The report concluded that Paul Manafort, the Trump campaign chairman, was working with Konstantin Kilimnik, identified by the committee as a Russian intelligence officer. Manafort repeatedly shared internal campaign information, including sensitive polling data and strategy for battleground states, with Kilimnik. The report found "some evidence suggests" Kilimnik may have been connected to the Russian military intelligence's hacking and leaking of Democratic Party emails.
  • Roger Stone and WikiLeaks: The Committee determined that the Trump campaign sought to obtain advance information on WikiLeaks' release of stolen Democratic emails through Trump associate Roger Stone. The report concluded that Trump and senior campaign officials spoke with Stone about WikiLeaks on multiple occasions, a finding that contradicted Trump's written answers to the Mueller investigation in which he stated he had "no recollection" of such conversations. The report implies Russian intelligence used Stone to its advantage in its operations.
  • Trump Tower Meeting: The report confirmed that the June 9, 2016 meeting at Trump Tower involving Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, Paul Manafort, and a Russian lawyer (Natalia Veselnitskaya) who offered "dirt" on Hillary Clinton was part of a "broader influence operation" from the Russian government. The committee noted that two of the Russian individuals present had "significant connections" to the Russian government, including intelligence services. However, the committee found no reliable evidence that beneficial information was exchanged at the meeting itself.
  • Willingness to Engage: The report details several episodes in which Trump and his campaign members were receptive to Russia's help, effectively embracing the disclosures of hacked Democratic emails to aid Trump's electoral prospects. The campaign created messaging strategies to promote the material and encouraged further leaks.
 
QP! said:
i am smarter.

I would tell you to read but we know that is beyond your intelligence level.

Report of the Select Committee on Intelligence United States Senate on Russian Active Measures Campaigns and Interference in the 2016 U.S. Election​


AI Summary:
The bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee's final 2020 report on Russian interference concluded that the Trump campaign's interactions with Russian intelligence officials were a "grave counterintelligence threat" and detailed extensive contacts, finding that some campaign members were willing to accept Russia's help.
Key findings regarding contact between Russian agents and the Trump campaign include:
  • Paul Manafort and Konstantin Kilimnik: The report concluded that Paul Manafort, the Trump campaign chairman, was working with Konstantin Kilimnik, identified by the committee as a Russian intelligence officer. Manafort repeatedly shared internal campaign information, including sensitive polling data and strategy for battleground states, with Kilimnik. The report found "some evidence suggests" Kilimnik may have been connected to the Russian military intelligence's hacking and leaking of Democratic Party emails.
  • Roger Stone and WikiLeaks: The Committee determined that the Trump campaign sought to obtain advance information on WikiLeaks' release of stolen Democratic emails through Trump associate Roger Stone. The report concluded that Trump and senior campaign officials spoke with Stone about WikiLeaks on multiple occasions, a finding that contradicted Trump's written answers to the Mueller investigation in which he stated he had "no recollection" of such conversations. The report implies Russian intelligence used Stone to its advantage in its operations.
  • Trump Tower Meeting: The report confirmed that the June 9, 2016 meeting at Trump Tower involving Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, Paul Manafort, and a Russian lawyer (Natalia Veselnitskaya) who offered "dirt" on Hillary Clinton was part of a "broader influence operation" from the Russian government. The committee noted that two of the Russian individuals present had "significant connections" to the Russian government, including intelligence services. However, the committee found no reliable evidence that beneficial information was exchanged at the meeting itself.
  • Willingness to Engage: The report details several episodes in which Trump and his campaign members were receptive to Russia's help, effectively embracing the disclosures of hacked Democratic emails to aid Trump's electoral prospects. The campaign created messaging strategies to promote the material and encouraged further leaks.
Click to expand...
9try and be smarter.
 
QP! said:
Be less stupid LyingFish as Biden's DoJ never investigate the pee tape either.

The Russian collusion between the Trump Campaign and Trump was absolutely PROVEN by the Rubio led Senate committee and the Mueller investigation both but because Trump lies and calls it a hoax, you are so stupid, you do so also.
Click to expand...
Your conspiracy theories have already been exposed, Kewpie.
 
QP! said:
The below is absolutely an appropriate satirization of the dilemma Trump puts his supporters to.

It DOES NOT matter that Trump has never murdered any one yet as Trump himself has said and knows.


ac246t.jpg


160125114628-donald-trump-quote-shoot-somebody.jpg


If you see the above satirization of the road fork choice, as @T. A. Gardner did and your reply is 'but Trump has never shot anyone so its a false dilemma' the reason you think that is because you are stupid.

Trump himself notes this is a position he could put his supporters in and he believes they would all choose the fork to continue supporting him.
Click to expand...
LTCM
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top