Maze
吃瓜群众
haven't seen him do that in months. ;-) Pearl is taking his place.At least @Into the Night isn't flooding JPP.
haven't seen him do that in months. ;-) Pearl is taking his place.At least @Into the Night isn't flooding JPP.
@Into the Night, @IBDaMann and @gfm7175 are all locked with each other.Yes. You are unhinged. You are locked in a paradox, and you are still trying to argue both conflicting arguments. It's irrational.
Still trying to redefine words. It won't work, Void.Again, there is no requirement to procreate to get married, therefore it is not a factor in allowing two people to enter into a legal agreement.
So, there is no reason for states to consider genitals to legally recognize a relationship.
Depending on the cause of infertility (if any), it can often be treated and corrected as well.You're right it's not a requirement but an expected outcome. To have to decide who is fertile and who isn't would place an undue burden on the state and no law should do that. The best way to ensure a people have and support children is by encouraging the only pairing at brings about children.
That's a tall order for LeftNut!Speak English.
Redefinition fallacy.Right.. procreation is not a requirement for the state to recognize the legal agreement between two adults.
So, since it is not a requirement, it sex should not be a factor in the legal agreement.
It cannot stand for that, since it is not possible.You don't know what SSM stands for ? It stands for same sex marriage.
Not possible.they just can't marry who they want because their genitals match those of the person they want to marry.
Who are you?It cannot stand for that, since it is not possible.
Synthesis. Illiteracy: Plurality used for singular.No it is not a marriage certificate.
Mocking deaf people only make you pathetic.
Who are you?Synthesis. Illiteracy: Plurality used for singular.
YAIF
No. It's separate. It is not equal in any sense of the word.People with different genitals get marriage
People with the same genitals get civil union
That's separate but equal.
It does.You want to pretend it has something to do with procreation,
He is quite honest. It is about your redefinition fallacies and your repetition fallacies.which isn't a requirement nor mentioned when giving the marriage license, because you are too dishonest to admit what this is really about.
There is no equal recognition of all people.
And I reject the lies that are the basis for disallowing equal recognition for all people.
Marriage IS recognized by States.They are refused the ability to have their relationship recognized by the state with the person they WANT it to be recognized.
And the reason it has been so difficult to get states to do the right thing is because of religion.
Only thing that you have said that is correct.There is no equal recognition of all people.
Thanks for admitting that same sex marriages are recognized.Marriage IS recognized by States.
Earth still exists, Sybil. You're standing on it.Yakuda is a weirdo living in a world that no longer exists.
There is no such thing as a 'same sex marriage'. Buzzword fallacy.What supremacy? Same sex marriages have no impact on straight marriages.
YARPYou can't speak for anyone but yourself.