Epstein emails released that strongly suggest trump knew about his activities....
- Thread starter Nomad
- Start date
Goldie, trump has said several times he's never been on the plane or to the pedophile house. 2015 Emails between Epstein and Maxwell prove they were planning to use that information that he actually WAS to blackmail him, should he be elected president.
Here's what's happening, Goldie, in my opinion:
Speaker Mike Johnson and most Republicans either know or suspect there is more to trump's involvement with Epstein than trump has admitted. Johnson refused to seat a newly elected Arizona Democrat because she would have been the deciding vote to release the DOJ Epstein files. Johnson's continued power as Speaker depends on trump remaining president - so Johnson has sacrificed his soul and his duty to The Constitution just to hang on to his seat.
trump lied about the "frat boy" birthday card he sent Epstein talking about "enigmas that never age" and "may another day be a beautiful secret". We know now that trump at least knew - if not also being involved in Epstein and Maxwell's crimes.
trump wished Gislaine Maxwell - a convicted sex-trafficer, "well" <-- what the fuck?
trump has "teased" a pardon for Maxwell.
trump's defense attorney, turned DOJ official, goes and talks to Maxwell, buys her silence in return for shipping her to a "club fed" with special privileges.
Goldie - I know you want to believe trump is "squeaky clean" vis-a-vis the Epstein disaster - but there is just too much evidence - including trump's really guilty behavior that is just too overwhelming to ignore.
Any other public offficial - if they had nothing to hide would say, "release the files and let the chips fall where they may".
trump's not doing that - he's trying to bury everything.
I'm 100% sure he's guilty to some degree - if not totally.
Attachments
Last edited:
QP!
Verified User
Even in the most generous of ways to view the below, which would be to say Trump could be the 'best friend', FOR 15 YEARS, with of one of America's top and most active pedophiles but somehow did not know what he was doing... that is a still a terrible look for Trump that he could be that blind.
The less generous take is he was 'willfully blind' and new but just convinced himself it was not important.
Listen To The Jeffrey Epstein Tapes: ‘I Was Donald Trump’s Closest Friend’
‘He’s a lot of fun to be with’: Trump and Epstein were close friends for 15 years
Who is "they"?
evince
Truthmatters
If they clear him he would want them released
volsrocks
Verified User
AI Overview
Michael Wolff's work has been a subject of significant controversy, with numerous accusations that he has been a "lying sack of s---," fabricates stories, and plays loose with the facts
. He is a polarizing figure in journalism, with both strong critics and some defenders.
Key Criticisms
Michael Wolff's work has been a subject of significant controversy, with numerous accusations that he has been a "lying sack of s---," fabricates stories, and plays loose with the facts
. He is a polarizing figure in journalism, with both strong critics and some defenders.
Key Criticisms
- Accuracy and Fact-Checking: Reviewers and journalists have frequently pointed out factual errors and inconsistencies in his books, such as misspellings, incorrect job titles, and wrong locations for events. One prominent example includes an incorrect claim that CNN broadcast salacious dossier contents (they did not).
- Fabrication and "Recreated" Scenes: A 2004 New Republic profile alleged that the scenes in his columns were "created" from his imagination rather than actual events. Other journalists have noted that many of the dialogues he quotes in his books are likely "recreations" rather than direct, factual accounts.
- Unreliable Sourcing Methods: Wolff has faced criticism for not always following standard journalistic practices, such as seeking comment from the subjects of his claims (like the Trump White House or Fox News) for a fact-check, suggesting he didn't believe they would be honest. He has also been accused of sometimes putting off-the-record comments on the record and being overly reliant on anonymous sources who may have had their own agendas.
- Bias and Sensationalism: Critics argue Wolff prioritizes sensational, "juicy" gossip over verified facts to maximize sales. Some also suggest his work on the Trump White House was extremely biased.
- Disputed Major Claims: Specific claims have been officially denied. For instance, in his book Siege, Wolff claimed he had a memo proving Robert Mueller's team had drafted an indictment against President Trump; Mueller's office officially denied that such a document existed.
trump's used to things exploding in his face. Like Russian hooker's bladders!
Hey, got some news for you, princess. trump IS the deep state!
The emails that just came out came from Epstein's estate - not from Democrats. You have no idea how life works, trumptard!
Is this finally it ?
QP!
Verified User
and direct Michael Wolff claim absolutely needs fact checking.
This IS NOT a Michael Wolff claim. This is an email exchange between him and Epstein where they are talking about 'what Trump did and did not disclose yet', and how that could be used against Trump for leverage if he lied about it during the debates, if asked.