Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
Cypress says this:
"Rationally and scientifically the right choice is eugenics. Expending enormous resources on the physically and mentally disabled, and on people with terminal illnesses is irrational and counterproductive in a scientific Darwinian worldview."
Rationally and scientifically the right choice is eugenics. Expending enormous resources on the physically and mentally disabled, and on people with terminal illnesses is irrational and counterproductive in a scientific Darwinian worldview.
Most posters on this board hardly ever practice the golden rule here. You can't go 60 minutes on this...
what the fuck is up with this instane Nazi perversion of science and is he correct?
I posit he is not correct and is a sick nazi.
discuss.
"Rationally and scientifically the right choice is eugenics. Expending enormous resources on the physically and mentally disabled, and on people with terminal illnesses is irrational and counterproductive in a scientific Darwinian worldview."
No, try again. Mutual benefit is not morality.I'm not a moral relativist.
I believe morality is a fairly fixed thing.
its a set of attitudes and behaviors that facilitate voluntary, cooperative and mutually beneficial relationships.
Rationally and scientifically the right choice is eugenics. Expending enormous resources on the physically and mentally disabled, and on people with terminal illnesses is irrational and counterproductive in a scientific Darwinian worldview.
Most posters on this board hardly ever practice the golden rule here. You can't go 60 minutes on this...
what the fuck is up with this instane Nazi perversion of science and is he correct?
I posit he is not correct and is a sick nazi.
discuss.