Zohran Mamdani Says He Will Defend Illegal Aliens’ RIGHT to Live in NYC!!!!

The moral rot infecting the Democrat Party was just proven by the vote to elect a Socialist/Communist as NYC mayor.

It was proven by electing a Democrat as A/G of Virginia who said that he wanted to shoot his opponent and his children in the head and piss on their graves.

The Democratic Party is now the party that embraces moral rot.
 
Illegals have no legal right to live in NYC or any other city in America

Mamdani is supporting criminality.

He also supports global intifada (kill all the Jews all over the world).

Moral rot.
 
Illegal immigrants have no right to live anywhere in the U.S.

Zohran Mamdani, NYC's newly elected mayor, has openly vowed to shield illegal aliens from deportation and strengthen sanctuary policies that put criminal invaders above American citizens. He brags about making NYC the "strongest sanctuary city" while planning to dump $165 million in taxpayer funds into legal defenses for those who broke our laws to get here.

This isn't compassion; it's a slap in the face to every law-abiding New Yorker struggling with crime and costs spiked by Biden-Harris border chaos.

POTUS Trump promised mass deportations starting Day 1, and if Mamdani wants to obstruct federal law, let him try.

Harboring illegals is a felony, and ICE won't ask nicely.

NYC voters just elected open borders over public safety. They will lose.

Statutorily, here are the primary federal criminal exposures he and the city government now face under a Trump DOJ that has explicitly created a "Sanctuary Cities Enforcement Working Group" to prosecute obstructing officials:
  1. 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) – Harboring, concealing, or shielding from detection
    Penalty: Up to 5 years imprisonment per alien (10 years if for commercial advantage or if death results); fines up to $250,000 per count; forfeiture of any property used.
    Since 1996, each alien shielded counts as a separate violation, so a single policy can yield hundreds or thousands of felony counts.
    NYC's existing laws (e.g., Local Law 58 barring NYPD/ICE cooperation) + Mamdani's new directives (no ICE in courts, no database access, city-funded lawyers coaching aliens on how to evade removal) easily meet the elements:
    • Knowing or reckless disregard that the aliens are unlawfully present
    • Substantial facilitation of their continued unlawful residence (housing in city shelters, legal defense to block removal, warnings of raids)
      Courts have convicted landlords for far less (renting apartments while knowing tenants were illegal). Providing city resources to keep deportable aliens hidden from ICE is textbook harboring.
      Precedent: No mayor has ever been indicted under §1324—yet. But the Trump DOJ's January 2025 memo and April 2025 executive orders explicitly direct U.S. Attorneys to charge local officials who "willfully obstruct" immigration enforcement. Mamdani's public boasts make intent undeniable.
  2. 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(3) – Pattern/practice of harboring
    Penalty: Up to 10 years per violation for any "person" (includes government entities/officials) who engages in a pattern of harboring during any 12-month period.
    NYC's systematic policy—now supercharged with $165M in legal aid, qualifies as institutional harboring.
  3. 18 U.S.C. § 111 – Forcibly resisting or impeding federal officers
    Penalty: Up to 8 years if physical contact; up to 20 years if a deadly weapon is used or bodily injury results.
    Ordering NYPD to physically block ICE from city jails or courts (as prior NYC mayors have threatened) crosses into felony obstruction.
  4. 18 U.S.C. § 372 – Conspiracy to impede federal officers
    Penalty: Up to 6 years.
    Any agreement among city officials to defy ICE warrants or hide aliens triggers this.
  5. Civil exposure for the City itself
    • Loss of all non-mandatory federal funds (Byrne JAG, COPS, Homeland Security grants—hundreds of millions annually). Multiple courts blocked Trump's first-term attempts, but new EOs and a 6-3 conservative Supreme Court make success more likely.
    • RICO lawsuits from victims of crimes committed by released criminal aliens (NYC has released thousands despite ICE detainers).
Bottom line: While past sanctuary mayors skated because DOJ never pulled the trigger, the 2025 Trump administration has already sued New York over its sanctuary laws and is openly hunting for test cases.

Mamdani's aggressive rhetoric ("ICE will have to go through me") is a prosecutor's dream. It's evidence of specific intent.

If ICE shows up with judicial warrants and Mamdani orders NYPD to stand in the way, handcuffs come out and go on that day.

If he simply continues the current non-cooperation + taxpayer-funded deportation defense, the Southern District of New York will likely indict him and top aides on multi-count §1324 felonies before summer.

NYC just elected the perfect defendant for the first-ever sanctuary mayor prosecution. Hope the voters enjoy the show.

The Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution) is the kill-shot to every single defense that Mamdani, his Corporation Counsel, or any NYCLU lawyer will try to run in the coming §1324 / §372 prosecutions.

Here’s exactly how it will be weaponized against them in the Southern District of New York the moment the indictment drops:
  1. Federal immigration enforcement is exclusively federal
    Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012) – SCOTUS held that the federal government has exclusive authority over immigration, and states/localities may not enact policies that “stand as an obstacle” to the full purposes of federal law.
    Providing city-funded lawyers whose entire job is to defeat federal removal orders is a textbook “obstacle” to 8 U.S.C. §1227 deportability findings.
  2. You cannot hide behind “state law” to break federal criminal statutes
    Every single time a sanctuary official claims “we’re just following Local Law 58” or “NY State Trust Act,” the prosecutor will read aloud from In re Neagle, 135 U.S. 1 (1890) and the Supremacy Clause:
    “If the State court can nullify federal authority by claiming its own laws conflict, then the Constitution is a dead letter.”
    Translation: Mamdani can pass 500 city laws saying “NYPD shall never honor an ICE detainer”—they are all preempted the second they conflict with 8 U.S.C. §1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) harboring prohibitions.
  3. No “Tenth Amendment” shield
    Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997) says the feds cannot commandeer state officials to enforce federal law.
    Sanctuary advocates love to mis-cite Printz.
    Here’s the part they leave out: when state officials affirmatively interfere with federal agents executing judicial warrants, that’s not “refusing to help; that’s obstructing, and the Supremacy Clause crushes any Tenth Amendment defense.
    See United States v. California, 921 F.3d 865 (9th Cir. 2019). Even the left-leaning 9th Circuit held that California’s SB 54 was partially preempted because it “impermissibly discriminates against federal operations.”
  4. Mamdani’s $165 million deportation-defense slush fund = direct conflict
    Spending city tax dollars to hire lawyers whose sole mission is to keep removable aliens in the U.S. in defiance of final removal orders is state-sponsored nullification of federal law.
    Under the Supremacy Clause, that appropriation itself is void ab initio.
    DOJ will move to freeze the entire fund via 18 U.S.C. §982 forfeiture the day charges are filed.
  5. The jury instructions will be brutal
    Judge: “Members of the jury, if you find that Mayor Mamdani knowingly used city resources to shield aliens from detection by federal authorities, then no city law, no state law, and no mayoral executive order can legally justify that conduct. The Constitution’s Supremacy Clause makes federal immigration law the supreme law of the land, and any local law to the contrary is void.”
Bottom line for Mamdani’s defense team: They can scream “states’ rights” all they want.

The moment they cross from “we won’t help ICE” into “we will actively pay lawyers to defeat ICE,” the Supremacy Clause turns every single one of their defenses into prosecutorial exhibits.

The Clause doesn’t just let Trump win bigly, it lets him win MEGA-MAGA-bigly on a motion to dismiss before discovery even starts.
 
Earl said:
The moral rot infecting the Democrat Party was just proven by the vote to elect a Socialist/Communist as NYC mayor.

It was proven by electing a Democrat as A/G of Virginia who said that he wanted to shoot his opponent and his children in the head and piss on their graves.

The Democratic Party is now the party that embraces moral rot.
Click to expand...


I've always embraced, it, Earl. Morals are a social construct. I yearn for a day when it become legal to hunt Democrats with dogs.
 
A Democratic Congressman just called President Trump “Stalin” who was a Communist.

The. Irony is thick, the Democrats just elected a Mamdani, a Communist.

You can’t make this stuff up.m
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top